 |
|
Current group: soc.retirement
Re: Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You
|
|
| | From: | RD (The Sandman) | | Subject: | Re: Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:03:33 -0700 |
|
|
 | Gactimus wrote:
> "Scout" <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
> news:69Kdncmug9yXwW_cRVn-3Q@adelphia.com:
>
>
>>"Gactimus" wrote in message
>>news:5RjId.203$PB.135@okepread01...
>>
>>
>>>Daniel Kolle wrote in
>>>news:vs73v095be64r4v95gjibgt8oi9gfbetr4@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 20 Jan 2005 15:27:17 GMT, Gactimus thought hard
>>>>and said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It looks like Spike Lee was right. Mr. Michael "Bowling for
>>>>>Columbine" Moore's bodyguards do carry guns,
>>>>>
>>>>>"Filmmaker Michael Moore's bodyguard was arrested for carrying an
>>>>>unlicensed weapon in New York's JFK airport Wednesday night."
>>>>
>>>>Is it criminal to walk around with an unregistered or unlicensed
>>>>firearm, Snubie?
>>>
>>>Apaarently it is in New York.
>>>
>>>
>>>>"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
>>>>state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE
>>>>INFRINGED."
>>>
>>>The Second Amendment doesn't apply to the states.
>>
>>14th Amendment. I think what you mean to say is that the Courts haven't
>>forced the states to recognize the 2nd as they have the other
>>Amendments.
>
>
> The 14th Amendment does no such thing. The Courts have only recently been
> enforcing the Bill of Rights on the states.
Huh? Some of those enforcements date back a few years. This list of
incorporations.
Incorporation by the Supreme Court.
First Amendment:
Freedom of Speech - Gitlow v New York - 268 US 652 (1925), Fiske v
Kansas - 274 US 380 (1927)
Freedom of Press - Near v Minnesota - 283 US 697 (1931)
Freedom of Assembly - Dejong v Oregon - 299 US 353 (1937)
Free Exercise of Religion - Cantrell v Connecticut - 310 US 296 (1940)
Ban on Religious Establishment - Everson v Board of Education - 330 US 1
(1947)
Freedom of Association - NAACP v Alabama - 357 US 449 (1958)
Fourth Amendment:
Unreasonable Search/Seizure - Wolf v Colorado - 418 US 25 (1949)
Exclusionary Rule - Mapp v Ohio - 367 US 643 (1961)
Fifth Amendment:
Just Compensation - Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad, Co v Chicago -
166 US 226 (1897)
Self Incrimination - Malloy v Hogan - 378 US 1 (1964)
Double Jeopardy - Benton v Maryland 395 US 784 (1969)
Sixth Amendment:
Assistance of Counsel in Capital Case - Peterson v City of Greenville -
373 US 244 (1963)
Right to Public Trial - Oliver, in Re - 333 US 257 (1948)
Assistance of Counsel in all Felony Cases - Gideon v Wainwright - 372 US
335 (1963)
Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses - Pointer v Texas - 380 US 400
(1965)
Right to Impartial Jury - Parker v Gladden - 385 US 363 (1966)
Right to Compulsory Process to Obtain Witnesses - Washington v Texas -
388 US 14 (1967)
Right to a Speedy Trial - Klopfer v N Carolina - 386 US 213 (1967)
Right to Jury in Nonpetty Criminal Cases - Duncan v Louisiana - 391 US
145 (1968)
Right to Counsel in Imprisonable Misdemeanor - Argersinger v Hamlin -
407 US 25 (1972)
Right to Notice of Accusation - Rabe v Washington - 405 US 313 (1972)
Right to Unamimous Verdict if Only Six Jurors - Burch v Louisiana - 441
US 130 (1979)
Eighth Amendment:
Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment - Robinson v California 370 US 660
(1962)
Just what do you consider recent?
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman
School - Four walls with tomorrow inside.
"The fatal attraction of government is that it allows busybodies to
impose decisions on others without paying any price themselves."
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making
decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who
pay no price for being wrong" Author Thomas Sowell
|
|
|
| | |
|
 |