|
|
 | | From: | Bill Drake | | Subject: | Steven Harper's "All Out Fight" against Gay Marriage | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 04:26:42 GMT |
|
|
 | So, as per the article at 365.com:
http://www.365.com/newscon05/01/012005harper.htm
Once again we have the Reform Party attempting to demonize the
community -- this time with a hate-filled agenda equating
"Gay Families" with polygamy.
Regardless of the total logical-disconnect between the two concepts,
the braindead members of the religious-right in North America are
still attempting to sell their policy of victim-creation and bigotry under
the banner of "social concern".
What utter and complete fabricated nonsense.
Now let me put this in words-of-one-syllable:
Dear Mr. Harper,
You LOST the Canadian federal election because the voting public
is too smart to fall for your idiocy.
Now, to add insult to injury, you are trying to *resubmit* the same
idiocy for our consideration *yet again* in slightly-disguised form.
Obviously, you have total contempt for the electorate and their
ability to see a hate-filled agenda for what it is.
Mr. Harper, you do not deserve to run this Country -- nor any other.
Now go away, give your head a shake, and tell your backroom boys
to go to hell.
If you ever expect to see the Reform Party taken seriously in the
corridors of power, you're going to have to start having sufficient
spine to call victim-creation unworthy of Conservative principles.
And don't for one minute think that I'll call you a Conservative until
you start to *demonstrate* that you understand those principles.
Bill
|
|
| | From: | occupant | | Subject: | Re: Steven Harper's "All Out Fight" against Gay Marriage | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:07:01 GMT |
|
|
| Bill Drake wrote:
>
> So, as per the article at 365.com:
>
> http://www.365.com/newscon05/01/012005harper.htm
>
> Once again we have the Reform Party attempting to demonize the
> community -- this time with a hate-filled agenda equating
> "Gay Families" with polygamy.
>
> Regardless of the total logical-disconnect between the two concepts,
> the braindead members of the religious-right in North America are
> still attempting to sell their policy of victim-creation and bigotry under
> the banner of "social concern".
>
> What utter and complete fabricated nonsense.
>
> Now let me put this in words-of-one-syllable:
>
> Dear Mr. Harper,
>
> You LOST the Canadian federal election because the voting public
> is too smart to fall for your idiocy.
>
> Now, to add insult to injury, you are trying to *resubmit* the same
> idiocy for our consideration *yet again* in slightly-disguised form.
>
> Obviously, you have total contempt for the electorate and their
> ability to see a hate-filled agenda for what it is.
>
> Mr. Harper, you do not deserve to run this Country -- nor any other.
>
> Now go away, give your head a shake, and tell your backroom boys
> to go to hell.
>
> If you ever expect to see the Reform Party taken seriously in the
> corridors of power, you're going to have to start having sufficient
> spine to call victim-creation unworthy of Conservative principles.
>
> And don't for one minute think that I'll call you a Conservative until
> you start to *demonstrate* that you understand those principles.
>
> Bill
Correct, but I wouldn't tell Mr. Harper that.
Let the enemy think they are winning, and they only fight half as hard.
So the correct message to Mr. Harper would be. Don't change a thing.
Keep a steady course and the worlds is yours!
|
|
| | From: | Manuel M Campagna | | Subject: | Re: Steven Harper's "All Out Fight" against Gay Marriage | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 20:47:20 GMT |
|
|
|
occupant (electronicmailfixtosend@telus.net) writes:
> Bill Drake wrote:
>> So, as per the article at 365.com:
>> http://www.365.com/newscon05/01/012005harper.htm
>> Once again we have the Reform Party attempting to demonize the
>> community -- this time with a hate-filled agenda equating
>> "Gay Families" with polygamy.
What's wrong with polygamy anyway? As long as it is between consenting
adults, of course. That's what most heteroual men do when they think
their wife won't find out, unless their cock and balls are soft.
>> Regardless of the total logical-disconnect between the two concepts,
>> the braindead members of the religious-right in North America are
>> still attempting to sell their policy of victim-creation and bigotry under
>> the banner of "social concern".
Actually they are an extremely well organized lobby complete with
conventions, tupperware-style pep-up parties, videos, DVDs and all kind of
kinky anti- paraphernalia (perhaps we could call anti- paraphernalia
"infernalia" -- just a thought). Think of them as highly intelligent and
crafty devils.
>> What utter and complete fabricated nonsense.
>> Now let me put this in words-of-one-syllable:
>> Dear Mr. Harper,
>> You LOST the Canadian federal election because the voting public
>> is too smart to fall for your idiocy.
Monosyllable glossary:
federal -> fed
election -> vote
because -> for
public -> mass
idiot -> dumb
>> Now, to add insult to injury, you are trying to *resubmit* the same
>> idiocy for our consideration *yet again* in slightly-disguised form.
insult -> mud
injury -> wound
submit -> show
consideration -> look
disguised -> masked
>> Obviously, you have total contempt for the electorate and their
>> ability to see a hate-filled agenda for what it is.
>> Mr. Harper, you do not deserve to run this Country -- nor any other.
>> Now go away, give your head a shake, and tell your backroom boys
>> to go to hell.
>> If you ever expect to see the Reform Party taken seriously in the
>> corridors of power, you're going to have to start having sufficient
>> spine to call victim-creation unworthy of Conservative principles.
>> And don't for one minute think that I'll call you a Conservative until
>> you start to *demonstrate* that you understand those principles.
>> Bill
> Correct, but I wouldn't tell Mr. Harper that.
> Let the enemy think they are winning, and they only fight half as hard.
> So the correct message to Mr. Harper would be. Don't change a thing.
> Keep a steady course and the worlds is yours!
Right on.
Manuel
|
|
| | From: | L. Michael Roberts | | Subject: | Re: Steven Harper's "All Out Fight" against Gay Marriage | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:08:57 -0500 |
|
|
|
Bill Drake wrote:
> So, as per the article at 365.com:
>
> http://www.365.com/newscon05/01/012005harper.htm
>
> Once again we have the Reform Party attempting to demonize the
> community -- this time with a hate-filled agenda equating
> "Gay Families" with polygamy.
>
> Regardless of the total logical-disconnect between the two concepts,
> the braindead members of the religious-right in North America are
> still attempting to sell their policy of victim-creation and bigotry under
> the banner of "social concern".
>
> What utter and complete fabricated nonsense.
>
> Now let me put this in words-of-one-syllable:
>
>
> Dear Mr. Harper,
>
> You LOST the Canadian federal election because the voting public
> is too smart to fall for your idiocy.
I stumbled upon some talking head show on CBC around supper time last
night.... some person from the Harper camp was talking about the ads
they intend to run in the ethnic and religious press. The
representative from Quebec on the show told him to save his money and
not to bother running ads in Quebec as 70+% of Quebec does not believe
in discrimination.
>
> Now, to add insult to injury, you are trying to *resubmit* the same
> idiocy for our consideration *yet again* in slightly-disguised form.
>
> Obviously, you have total contempt for the electorate and their
> ability to see a hate-filled agenda for what it is.
>
>
> Mr. Harper, you do not deserve to run this Country -- nor any other.
>
> Now go away, give your head a shake, and tell your backroom boys
> to go to hell.
>
> If you ever expect to see the Reform Party taken seriously in the
> corridors of power, you're going to have to start having sufficient
> spine to call victim-creation unworthy of Conservative principles.
>
> And don't for one minute think that I'll call you a Conservative until
> you start to *demonstrate* that you understand those principles.
>
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a ually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
|
|
| | From: | Manuel M Campagna | | Subject: | Re: Steven Harper's "All Out Fight" against Gay Marriage | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 20:32:03 GMT |
|
|
|
"Bill Drake" (bdrake@telus.net) writes:
> So, as per the article at 365.com:
> http://www.365.com/newscon05/01/012005harper.htm
> Once again we have the Reform Party attempting to demonize the
> community -- this time with a hate-filled agenda equating
> "Gay Families" with polygamy.
> Regardless of the total logical-disconnect between the two concepts,
> the braindead members of the religious-right in North America are
> still attempting to sell their policy of victim-creation and bigotry under
> the banner of "social concern".
> What utter and complete fabricated nonsense.
> Now let me put this in words-of-one-syllable:
> Dear Mr. Harper,
> You LOST the Canadian federal election because the voting public
> is too smart to fall for your idiocy.
IMHO he's not an idiot at all: he's a incubus.
> Now, to add insult to injury, you are trying to *resubmit* the same
> idiocy for our consideration *yet again* in slightly-disguised form.
> Obviously, you have total contempt for the electorate and their
> ability to see a hate-filled agenda for what it is.
> Mr. Harper, you do not deserve to run this Country -- nor any other.
Error. Wunderkind Stevie Harper has already shown full ability to run
the country of Hell.
> Now go away, give your head a shake, and tell your backroom boys
> to go to hell.
You mean "back to hell".
> If you ever expect to see the Reform Party taken seriously in the
> corridors of power, you're going to have to start having sufficient
> spine to call victim-creation unworthy of Conservative principles.
It used to be called the CRAP (Conservative Reform Alliance Party).
Please use this appropriate monicker in future.
> And don't for one minute think that I'll call you a Conservative until
> you start to *demonstrate* that you understand those principles.
Those crappy people are always talking about "Western Alienation". This
is appropriate for Western Aliens.
> Bill
Manuel
|
|
|
