newsgroups-index (beta)

Current group: soc.men

Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS

Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Citrus Juice
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
From:Citrus Juice
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:25:42 +1030

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f4301c$0$20754$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and
>> their marriages.
>
> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
> domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not
> represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves
> have to take the first step down that path.
>
> Sylvia.

Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report.
Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the
jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying
stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:24:19 +1100


Citrus Juice wrote:

>>People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
>>domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not
>>represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves
>>have to take the first step down that path.
>>
>>Sylvia.
>
>
> Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report.

Though doing so other than in good faith is good for up to 6 months in gaol.

> Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the
> jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying
> stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.

OK, let's look at the law. We're obviously talking about this act:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/caypa1999242/

And in particular, part 7.3, which relates to care and protection
orders. How should this law be altered to make it less stupid and damaging?

Sylvia
   

Copyright © 2006 newsgroups-index   -   All rights reserved   -   Impressum