|
|
 | | From: | Cindy Tittle Moore | | Subject: | soc.feminism Information FAQ | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:27:42 GMT |
|
|
 | Archive-name: feminism/info Posting-frequency: 25 days URL: http://www.io.com/~tittle/feminism/info.html Last-modified: 22 Nov 1999
soc.feminism Information This is an informational post about the newsgroup soc.feminism. It is posted every 25 days to soc.feminism and is available at http://www.io.com/~tittle/feminism/info.html. Copies of this FAQ may be obtained by anonymous ftp to rtfm.mit.edu under /pub/usenet/news.answers/feminism/info. Or, send email to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with send usenet/news.answers/feminism/info in the body of the message, leaving the subject line empty. _________________________________________________________________ History of soc.feminism
This newsgroup was formed in late 1989. There was considerable debate over the subject matter of the group, who would be allowed to post, who would moderate, and what the name of the group would be. There was a large contingent of people who were afraid that the purpose of soc.feminism would be to provide a women-only feminist-supportive environment, and they ensured at the time that the charter of soc.feminism would allow pro-feminist and anti-feminist views, and be open to both women and men. In the end, four moderators were selected to moderate the group. As for the name of the group, it was nearly named talk.feminism, but soc.feminism won out. The decision was somewhat political, as it was felt that more sites carried soc. groups than talk. groups. The original proposer of soc.feminism was Patricia Roberts, who collected the votes, worked with Greg Woods to set up a program allowing multiple moderators and chose the initial moderators. We were the first multiply moderated group: soc.religion.islam, rec.arts.sf.reviews, sci.physics.research and others have since followed suit. The four original moderators of soc.feminism were Cindy Tittle Moore, Miriam Nadel, Jean Marie Diaz and Valerie Maslak. Maslak dropped out about a year later when faced with increasing net-connection trouble. Diaz has not moderated since the summer of 1991, and Nadel has taken an extended leave of absence after completing her doctorate and taking up consulting work in mid 1992. Muffy Barkocy became a new moderator in December of 1991 and retired in January of 1994. Paul Wallich joined us in the beginning of 1993. Fazia Rizvi joined us for about a year in 1996, and Sally Nordquist moderated for part of 1995 and 1996. The most recent moderator to join the fold is Julia Kotsatka, who began moderating in March of 1997. As of mid 1998, there are two moderators: Paul and Cindy. People who objected to soc.feminism's moderated format created the group alt.feminism in protest in the summer of 1992. Some dissatisfaction with how the group was progressing was discussed in the summer of 1993. A full scale discussion on a charter proposed by the moderators resulted and the charter was adopted at the end of the summer. Note that prior to this soc.feminism had had no charter, and used an informal set of guidelines instead. Women and men both of diverse views (but not hostile to feminism) have always been welcome to post. Therefore the group currently tries to provide a pro-feminist (but not women-only) space on Usenet. _________________________________________________________________ Charter
Soc.feminism is a feminist discussion forum. Discussion on feminist theory, experiences, and opinion are all welcomed. The basic validity of feminism as a viewpoint, however, is not to be considered at issue. That is, no anti-feminist postings will be allowed. Note that "anti-feminist" does not necessarily include those who question feminist tenets so long as the intent is to find a better direction to take rather than to dismantle feminism. The overall goal of the newsgroup is to provide information to those wishing to learn more about feminism and to serve as a resource to those who consider themselves feminists. To this end, thoughtful, informational, well-organized and non-inflammatory articles will be preferred. Speculations and opinions should be clearly labelled as such, and sweeping generalizations about feminism (and women, and men) should be strictly avoided, in the spirit of recognizing that feminism takes many forms, opinions and positions. For the purposes of this newsgroup, a working definition of feminism is as follows: 1. The belief that women and men are, and have been, treated differently by our society, and that women have frequently and systematically been unable to participate fully in all social arenas and institutions. 2. A desire to change that situation. 3. That this gives a "new" point-of-view on society, when eliminating old assumptions about why things are the way they are, and looking at it from the perspective that women are not inferior and men are not "the norm." Obviously people will differ on the implications, opinions and course of action necessary that they derive from this basic position. Topical content is expected to be of interest to feminism. A wide variety of topics may be discussed; if the topic is no longer obviously feminist related, discussion may continue, as long as participants make it clear how their feminist views affect their opinions on the topic. The topics of rape and abortion are prohibited from this group, and discussion on these is directed to talk.rape and talk.abortion, respectively. Informational postings describing abortion rallies or Take Back the Night activities are the only exceptions. Inflammatory articles, ad-hominem or personal attacks are also prohibited. The parallel topic of equal rights for men is not to be the primary focus of this group. In particular, posts pointing an accusing finger at feminism for not being right there to create shelters for abused husbands or diverting/dismissing discussion on discrimination against women by pointing out where men are discriminated against instead are prohibited. Feminism is primarily concerned with eliminating bias against women; efforts to eliminate bias against men are equally laudable; but discussion of same will be steered toward soc.men, alt.dads-rights and other suitable forums. This is not to say that all discussion will ignore the situation of men, or how to make that better; most feminists do want to make things better for all people and in particular many radical feminists point out that you can't do one without the other. Discussion of men's rights is not prohibited, but such discussion may not be used as a means for invalidating or squelching other topics. Since there are many conflicting aspects of feminist thought, we know that posters to soc.feminism will disagree on some issues. Nevertheless, an attitude of *mutual respect* is expected. Soc.feminism is not to be a place for "conversion" -- people are not expected to convert non-feminists to feminism or vice versa. Neither are people expected to convert others from one flavor of feminism to another. Therefore, responses to a post that one disagrees with are not expected to pick apart that post but to describe alternate points of view and their supporting reasons. For example, if an article posts "a, b, and c" and you disagree, an article that says "I disagree, I think d, e, and f" will be preferred over "I disagree: not a, not b, and not c". Note that polite critiques, especially as part of minority views in feminism, will usually be accepted, but individuals who consistently post only critiques may be asked to contribute positive and informational articles about topics they're interested in instead. If we can't distinguish your article as an honest critique from an anti-feminist stance, we will ask you to clarify your position in your post. In borderline cases, depth of thought, originality and good writing will count. That is, an interesting posting will be preferred to a dull one. Decisions of the moderators based on these subjective factors are final. Those whose articles do not meet the above criteria are encouraged to explore alternative groups such as: alt.feminism, alt.dads-rights, soc.feminism.d (if created), soc.men, soc.women, talk.abortion, talk.politics.misc, and talk.rape. _________________________________________________________________ Submissions and Requests addresses
To submit an article to soc.feminism, post as you normally do for other, non-moderated groups. This should work for most people. If you have trouble with this, email the article to feminism@ncar.ucar.edu. This will treat it exactly as any other article posted to soc.feminism (in fact, this is the address that your newsreader should email the intercepted article to). If you have questions about the group, you can send your questions to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu. This address will forward your mail to all active moderators (moderators take vacations, too). Please do not send email specifically to any one moderator unless you have been requested to do so, as email addresses and moderators may change. It is strongly recommended that you save a copy of each post you make to soc.feminism. If it fails to appear and you do not receive a rejection notice, then you should mail it along with a (politely worded) query about the status of the article to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu. Do not send the article in again, it might go to a different moderator. Use the request address so that you reach all current moderators and so you can determine who, if anyone, got the submission. No crossposting is allowed and approved articles will drop any other groups listed in the headers. Because articles sent to moderated groups are intercepted and emailed to the moderators of the group, you will not see the article appear anywhere else. Thus you are advised to repost your article without soc.feminism (or any other moderated group) in the headers if it is important that it appear elsewhere. "Spam proofed" addresses are not prohibited, but you will not get any responses from us as we see no need to take the extra effort to decipher the address in responding. If it bounces, it bounces. _________________________________________________________________ General Guidelines for submission
You should first note that these guidelines are just that. They cannot precisely spell out exactly what will be accepted and what will be rejected. Much can depend on context, for example. In addition, there are always new takes on topics, and a set of guidelines could not hope to enumerate them all. 1. Articles must be relevant to feminism. They may not contain ad-hominem attacks or flames. 2. Discussion of the moderation of the group (what happened to an article, whether or not an article is really appropriate, etc.) must be sent to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu to reach all moderators. Where appropriate, include a copy of the article in question. Such discussion will not be posted to the newsgroup. This is not hard and fast, and discussion on the nature of the group's moderation has in the past occured on soc.feminism. 3. Two topics that are of general feminist interest that are severely restricted here are abortion and rape. This is partly because the topics are inherently inflammatory and because there exist talk.abortion and talk.rape newsgroups to carry on full-fledged debates. Some discussion *is* allowed, mostly as long as the articles are not inflammatory and as long as the primary focus is on the topic's relationship with feminism. Informative articles (e.g., about specific groups, or calls for marches, or official positions of feminist organizations, etc) are allowed. You should note that while soc.feminism takes no official position on the question of abortion, the majority of abortion-related articles that are approved tend to be pro-choice simply because most of the articles submitted are. This should not be construed to reflect the personal opinions of the moderators, or of any individual posting to soc.feminism. 4. Every now and then someone posts a question of the form "This is a feminist newsgroup, but I never see any women posting to it!" This may or may not be accompanied by a plea for men to reduce their posting. In the first place, simple demographics of USENET mean that there are overwhelmingly more men than women with access to USENET/email. The existence, however, of some groups that are almost totally female or balanced more 50-50, points to other problems than simple demographics. Many women have complained that soc.feminism is still "too hostile" for other women; there are undoubtedly many others that refrain from posting because of the negative aspects of being labelled or considered a feminist. If you are a woman and would like to see more women post, the only practical action you can take is ... to post. Asking men to refrain from posting is simply unfair, especially given USENET's public nature. There are a number of women-only forums, pointers to which appear in the Resources FAQ. 5. There are many other topics that flare up into prolonged and protracted disagreements. Chief among these are 1) the question of gender neutral language, 2) the actual statistics on spouse-beating or other crimes in comparing which gender is "worse off," 3) the propriety of "women only" events when "men only" are always attacked as ist (including the question of women-only colleges). These topics have come up many times and most regular readers would be appreciative if you check and even read some of the references given on these topics in the References post before jumping in or starting such a topic. This gives everybody a common basis to discuss from. While these topics are not forbidden, they may be stopped at the moderators' discretion when circularity starts to occur. 6. Other articles that are otherwise perfectly acceptable may be rejected if a number of prior articles have made the same point, e.g., someone asks for a book title, or someone makes a point and a number of people make the same counterpoint. "Me too" and "What s/he said" articles are generally rejected as well. The aim is to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio as much as possible. 7. The subject of homouality is relatively sensitive. We will not post anything we deem homophobic (we consider this to fall under unwarranted attacks that are already forbidden). Many articles on or about lesbianism are considered relevant to feminism because of the close association between feminism and lesbianism. Articles about males are accepted if there is a clear relevance to feminism present. The point is, there are ties between feminism and homouality, whether or not one disapproves of it. Those ties can be discussed so long as the question of whether or not homouality is "right" or "wrong" is avoided (since such discussion is irrelevant to feminism). Here's a check list: + Gay rights in general are structurally similar to women's rights, black rights, minority rights, etc. They may be acceptable (as would black or minority rights articles) if there are parallels drawn with feminism or some other clearly drawn link. + Because much of the theory of patriarchy revolves around how female uality is directed and used for the benefit of the patriarchy, Lesbianism is often considered a direct challenge to the patriarchy, especially in Western cultures. Therefore most articles on Lesbianism are relevant. + Anti- rhetoric is not acceptable. Calm and reasoned arguments against homouality are not acceptable. Soc.feminism is not a forum for whether or not homouality is "right" or "wrong." + Discussion of whether or not feminism itself is homophobic (with the a priori assumption that homophobia is wrong) is very interesting and a welcomed topic. 8. The subject of transuality is potentially explosive. Again, we will not post anything we deem anti-TS (we consider this to fall under unwarranted attacks that are already forbidden). Many articles on or about tranuality are considered relevant to feminism because of the fundamental questions about gender identity this involves. However, articles accusing M2F folks of trying to "sneak into" women only events, that they are inferior to "born women", that they deserve contempt only, etc, shall be rejected. 9. If the post includes private email, be sure to obtain that individual's permission before posting it. There are no legal rules about this (yet), but it is requested as part of general net.etiquette for this group. 10. If you are posting material that may be copyrighted, please give all information about where it comes from. Partial quotes, newspaper articles, book blurbs and the like are generally OK, but with full source information, we can decide whether such postings potentially infringe copyright law. We will not post articles that violate copyright law: examples include entire newspaper or magazine articles, or substantial portions of books. A review that extensively quotes such a source is OK, a commentary on such a source without as much quoting is better. 11. Posting pointers alone to discussions in other groups is not generally allowed. However, a discussion of such a thread in another group is perfectly fine, eg, summarizing the discussion and adding your thoughts to it. Remember that we do not crosspost any soc.feminism articles in any case; articles that simply add soc.feminism to the list of newsgroups to an ongoing thread will be rejected as lacking context (especially when such articles try to import a flamewar). 12. Finally, please edit out all unnecessary quoted text and pay attention to your attributions. We have done some ourselves when it seemed necessary, but we do not feel that this should be part of our job. Therefore, your article may be returned with a request to streamline it if you do not take care to remove old signatures, excess text, unrelated points and the like. _________________________________________________________________ Multiple Moderation
This group is moderated by several moderators, each working independently. Submissions are sent to feminism@ncar.ucar.edu, where one current moderator is selected, and the article forwarded to that moderator only. This means that there is some variation in what is approved or not, since there is inherent individual variation between different people. We do try to minimize this variation by consulting with each other on the occassional, problematic, article. However, the whole purpose of multiple moderation is to reduce the load on any one individual, therefore we do not consult each other over every posting we get. Please keep this in mind if you have a complaint which may be related to this. _________________________________________________________________ Anonymous Posting
We have posted articles anonymously for contributors before. In general, you must satisfy us that you have a good reason for remaining anonymous. You will not be anonymous to the moderators, but your article will be posted without identifying material if we consent to posting it anonymously. For articles that you wish to be posted anonymously, you must preface it with your request and your reasons for the request. We will not post it if we think that your reasons are insufficient or deceitful; you will be informed via email of the decision. In any case, your identity will be kept confidential. Mail "handles" are not considered anonymous; anonymity is when there is no email address available to reach the person who posted the article. Soc.feminism has no policy regarding the common practice of using a fanciful name or nickname instead of the real name in the "handle" field. (We do, however, reserve the right to question or refuse articles from people appearing to be using aliases for disruptive purposes, particularly if they have done so on usenet before.) There are several anonymous mail servers that set up a double anonymous connection: when you send mail to it, it gives you an anonymous email address, and anyone responding to that email address gets an anonymous address of their own. We do not have any objections to people using this software (since you provide a valid email address to send to), but be aware that some of these services are a bit buggy and may cause us problems especially if we reject your article. In addition, such services may add several days delay in forwarding email back and forth. We reserve the right to reject such articles from these services at our discretion. _________________________________________________________________ Editorial Policy
If the moderator who receives your article thinks that it is generally OK if it is somewhat edited, you will get your article back with comments. At this point, you can change it and send it back directly to that moderator. If you feel that changes are unreasonable, you can appeal to the feminism-request address. Articles that are rejected receive a "rejection notice"; again if you think it was unfounded, drop a note to feminism-request. If you sent an article and it has not appeared nor have you received email about it, you may wish to enquire via feminism-request. Do keep in mind, though, that articles may sit for a while; moderators do not necessarily check their mail over the weekends, and that site connectivity may mean that your site will not receive your article from the moderator's site within the time you expect. However, email is not perfect and has been known to send mail into giant black holes, so bear with us. The moderators may make cosmetic modifications to articles that have lines that are too long, have their attributions mixed up, or quote excessive material. Moderators will occasionally inject their comments, usually to the effect of advising people where followups are going to, warning of topic drift, or some other explanatory note. Any further modifications are always after consultation with the original author as described in the previous paragraph. _________________________________________________________________ Please mail in comments, additions, corrections, suggestions, and so on to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu.
|
|
 | | From: | Cindy Tittle Moore | | Subject: | soc.feminism Resources FAQ | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:29:44 GMT |
|
|
 | Archive-name: feminism/resources Posting-frequency: 25 days URL: http://www.io.com/~tittle/feminism/resources.html Last-modified: 22 Nov 1999
soc.feminism Resources This faq has been deleted.
|
|
 | | From: | Cindy Tittle Moore | | Subject: | soc.feminism References (part 3 of 3) | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:29:43 GMT |
|
|
 | Archive-name: feminism/refs3 Version: 2.2 Last-modified: 15 February 1993
This posting contains useful feminist references for the newsgroup soc.feminism.
Copies of this FAQ may be obtained by anonymous ftp to rtfm.mit.edu under /pub/usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs3. Or, send email to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs1 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs2 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs3 in the body of the message, leaving the subject line empty.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[1-8 in part I, 9-17 in part II] 18. Public Policies Regarding Women. 19. Reactions to Feminism. 20. Religion. 21. Sex and/or Violence, Sexual Abuse. 22. Sexual Harassment and Discrimination. 23. Test Biases. 24. Women of Color. 25. Women's Health.
(Auto)Biographies. Miscellaneous. Acknowledgements.
[continuing from part II]
18. Public Policies Regarding Women. -------------------------------------
Abramovitz, Mimi. _Regulating the Lives of Women. Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present_. An analysis of the impact of US social welfare policy, documents how the family ethic has been translated into punitive welfare approaches toward women
Baldock, Cora V., and Bettina Cass, eds. _Women, Social Welfare, and the State in Australia_. Allen & Unwin, Sydney and Boston. 1983.
Dahl, Tove Stang. _Women's Law: An Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence_. Oxford University Press. 1987. Proposal for a "women's law" by Norwegian sociologist of law.
Diamond, Irene, ed. _Families, Politics, and Public Policy_. New York. Longman. 1983.
Enloe, Cynthia. _Bananas, Beaches and Bases_. A radical analysis of international politics revealing the crucial role of women in implementing government foreign policies. It deals with several problems, one of which is prostitution especially in asia, and also with regard to US military bases.
Freeman, Michael D.A. . _The State, the Law, and the Family: Critical Perspectives_. Tavistock Publications, New York. 1984. A collection of articles, many British, on the interrelationship between the family, the state and patriarchy.
Glendon, Mary Ann. _Abortion and Divorce in Western Law_. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. 1987. Overview and analysis of abortion and divorce laws in several western countries.
Gordon, Linda, ed. _Women, the State, and Welfare_. University of Wisconsin Press. 1990. Collection on women and the welfare state. Includes articles by Elizabeth Schneider on rights, and Frances Fox Piven.
Hernes, Helga Maria. _Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism_. Scandinavian Library series. Norwegian University Press, Oxford. Distributed by Oxford University Press. 1987. Critique of the patriarchal nature of the Scandinavian welfare state. Mason, Mary Ann. _The Equality Trap_. Simon & Schuster, New York. 1988. Discusses how the push for equality laws has actually been to the detriment of women, particularly in the area of family law. The author is a lawyer.
Mueller, Carol M., ed. _The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence_. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA. 1988.
Ruggie, Mary. _The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden_. Princeton University Press. 1984.
Pateman, Carole. _The Sexual Contract_. Stanford University Press. 1988. The meaning of the social "contract" for women.
Pateman, Carole. _The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory_. Stanford University Press. 1989. A discussion of women's role in the rise of democratic theory. The meaning of consent.
Paul, Ellen Frankel. _Equity and Gender: the Comparable Worth Debate_. 1990. Begins by explaining how comparable worth -- or pay equity imposed by law -- is a full frontal assault on the free market by those who scoff at the market's ability to provide justice, and argues that the free market, not the state, is the better ally of feminism.
Petchesky, Rosalind. _Abortion: A Woman's Choice_. 1990. Excellent study of abortion politics in America. Examines the patriarchal and capitalist roots underlying the abortion controversy, as well as (in 1990 edition) the meaning of the rights discourse for women. Re-imagining "rights."
Tribe, Laurence H. _Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes_. W.W. Norton, New York, London. 1990. ISBN: 0-393-30699-2. Tribe is a professor of constitutional law and brings this expertise to his evaluation of the constitutional question of abortion. Besides drawing a sympathetically balanced view of the two extremes, he shows what that consequences for the constitution would be upon defining a fetus as a "person." Excellent and very readable, unlike many constitutional analyses of any sort.
Sassoon, Anne Showstack, ed. _Women and the State_. Unwin Hyman, Winchester, MA. 1988. An international collection of articles on women and the welfare state.
Stetson, Dorothy McBride. _Women's Rights in the USA. Policy Debates and Gender Roles_. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA. 1991. ISBN: 0-534-14898-0. The author examines the hottest current topics in the US that relate to women, and how the mjor controversies and policies affect gender roles and being female in this country.
Wilson, Elizabeth. _Women and the Welfare State_. Tavistock Publications, London. 1977.
19. Reactions to Feminism. ---------------------------
Faludi, Susan. _Backlash. The Undeclared War Against American Women_, (1991). Gives an overview of the reaction to feminism in America today. It is an incredible compendium of incorrect facts, bogus statistics, false logic and unfounded theories, all of which which are presented by society and the media in particular as "true" and "factual" in order to keep women subordinate. One caveat about this book is that the author seems unsympathetic to the difficult choices a woman must make if she wants to combine career and family.
Kamen, Paula, "Feminism, a Dirty Word", The New York Times, November 23, 1990, page A37.
Leidholdt, Dorchen and Janice G. Raymond, eds. _The Sexual Liberals and the Attack on Feminism_. Pergamon Press, New York. 1990. Essays which originated as speeches and panel presentations at a conferences on April 6, 1987, at the New York University Law School. Includes bibliographical references and index.
Smith, Joan. _Misogynies: Reflections on Myths and Malice_. Fawcett Columbine Book, Ballantine Books, Publishers. 1989. ISBN:0-449-90591-8. From blurb: "Joan Smith has written a witty and bold collection of essays on the alarming subject of women-hating. She observes the phenomenon wryly and never succumbs to the fatuous generalizations which characterize misogyny itself...Misogyny, unlike ism, grows in this way behind women's backs, which may be why we sometimes optimistcially believe it is no longer prevalent. It is aptly, intelligently and compassionately put before us again in this well-written book." (Literary Review). 20. Religion. --------------
Adler, Margot. _Drawing Down the Moon_. Revised edition. Beacon Press, Boston. 1986. ISBN: 0-8070-3253-0. This has a chapter on "Women, Feminism, and the Craft". It places feminist wicca in one of its contexts. Otherwise the book is mainly about neopaganism.
Armstrong, Karen. _The Gospel According to Woman_. Anchor Books, Doubleday. 1987. ISBN: 0-385-24079-1 (trade paperback). A provocative interpretation of the history of women in Christianity. In particular, there are interesting parallels between the Virgins (who could stay separate from men) of Christian history and latter-day feminists. Beck, Evelyn Torton, ed. _Nice Jewish Girls. A Lesbian Anthology_. Revised and updated. Beacon Press, Boston. 1989.
Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schussler. _Bread Not Stone_. Beacon Press, Boston. 1984. ISBN: 0-8070-1103-7 (trade paperback). Feminist biblical interpretation.
Greenberg, Blu. _On Women and Judaism: A View from Tradition_. Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia. 1981. This discusses conflicts between Orthodox Judaism and feminism, and suggests resolutions of the conflicts within the boundaries of Jewish law.
Hampson, Daphne. _Theology and Feminism_. Basil Blackwell Ltd/Inc. 1990. ISBN: 0-631-14944-9. Discusses the limitations of Christianity from a feminist perspective, and suggests ways for moving beyond Christianity.
Heine, Susanne. _Women and Early Christianity: A Reappriasal_. Augsburg Publishing House, Minneapolis. 1988. ISBN: 0-8066-2359-4. Documents the strength of influence women had in early Christianity, uses this as basis for concluding that Christianity need not be anti-woman. Originally published in German under _Frauen der Fru:hen Christenheit_. Heschel, Susannah. _On Being a Jewish Feminist: A Reader_. Schocken, 1984. Kaye/Kantrowitz, Melanie and Irena Klepfisz. _The Tribe of Dina: A Jewish Women's Anthology_. Beacon Press. 1989.
Koltun, Elizabeth. _The Jewish Woman: New Perspectives_. Schocken Books, 1976.
Miles, Margaret R. . _Carnal Knowing: Female Nakedness and Religious Meaning in the Christian West_. Beacon Press, Boston. 1989. Looks at how images of the female body have shaped and been shaped by religious and social forces. Although most of the emphasis is mediaeval, It has a final chapter that looks at a modern perspective. Has an excellent section on Hildegard von Bingen, one of the few female writers of the middle ages.
Pagel, Elaine. _Adam, Eve, and The Serpent_. Random House, New York. 1988. Also, _The Gnostic Gospels_. Vintage Books edition, Random House, New York. 1989. The former is a thorough exploration of how the Genesis myth is inextricably interwined with western culture views of women. The latter shows how the early Christian church although initially receptive to women became patriarchal.
Plaskow, Judith. _Standing Again at Sinai: Judaism From A Feminist Perspective_. Harper Collins, 1990. ISBN 0-06-066684-6. Plaskow discusses conflicts between Judaism and feminism, and suggests ways to make Judaism into a feminist religion. Ruther, Rosmary Radford. _Women-Church. Theology and Practice of Feminist Liturgical Communities_. ISBN 0-06-066834-2. This is a collection of liturgies for unconventional purposes (i.e. A Coming-Out rite for a Lesbian). They are not so much pagan as they are feminist. They ignore the distinctions between Christian and non-Christian. The thesis of the book is in part that women should create their own ritual without waiting for the "church" to catch up with their reality. Ruther has written other books with similar themes.
Schneider, Susan Weidman. _Jewish and Female_. Simon & Schuster. ISBN: 0-671-60439-2.
Sprentak, Charlene, ed. _The Politics of Women's Spirituality: Essays on the Rise of Spiritual Power within the Feminist Movement_. 1982. ISBN. 0-385-17241-9. This is a thick (590pp) sampler with short pieces by a number of important authors. A few are written as responses to others which gives a bit more sense of the dialog.
Starhawk. _The Spiral Dance_. 10th anniversary edition, revised. Harper & Row, San Francisco. 1989. ISBN 0-06-250814-8. This has clearly been a very influential book. Z. Budapest is another mother of feminist wicca from the same era; Starhawk seems a bit more readable and less cookbook-like. Stone, Merlin. _When God Was a Woman_. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers. 1976. ISBN: 0-15-696158-X (trade paperback). Historical revisionist view of early matriarchal & female-based worship.
21. Sex and/or Violence and Sexual Abuse. ------------------------------------------
*"Sexual Abuse as a Precursor to Prostitution and Victimization Among Adolescent and Adult Homeless Women." Journal of Family Issues. v12 n3 p361.
*"Four Theories of Rape: A Macrosociological Analysis". _Social Problems_ 34, No. 5 (1986) General-social-disinhibition theory is used to model the correlation between ual magazines and rape.
*_Pornography and Sexual Aggression_ Barry, Kathleen. _Female Sexual Slavery_. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979; New York University Press, London and New York, 1984. Bart, Pauline and Patricia O'Brien. _Stopping Rape: Successful Survival Strategies_. Pergamon Press, New York. 1985.
Browne, Angela. _When Battered Women Kill_. Collier Macmillian, London; Free PRess, New York. 1987. Brownmiller, Susan. _Against Our Will_. Bantam. 1975. This is a disturbing, contradictory work. It is misrepresented both by feminist and anti-feminist camps; feminists lauding it as a quintessentially accurate portrayal of rape, the anti-feminists denouncing it as a virulently anti-male piece of propoganda. A landmark work that first documented the social and historical consequences of rape in our society.
Caputi, Jane. _The Age of Sex Crime_. Bowling Green State University Popular Press, Bowling Green, OH. 1987. Case studies on murder and crimes.
Ellis, Lee and Charles Beattie. "The Feminist Explanation for Rape. An Empirical Test," _Journal of Sex Research_, 19(1).74-93, Feb 1983. Abstract. The feminist explanation for rape includes the proposition that it derives from traditions of male domination in social, political, and economic matters. As a test of this thesis, official FBI and victimization statistics on rape were compared across 26 large United States central cities relative to various indicators of these cities' degree of social, political, and economic inequality between the es. Of 14 correlations, 4 were significant, 3 with a sign opposite to that predicted by the feminist explanation. When presumed effects of the two strongest control variables were removed by partial correlation techniques, only one coefficient was significant, and it was in the direction contrary to the feminist explanation. Rape rates appear unrelated to inequalities of earnings, education, occupational prestige, or employment. The belief that reducing disparities in social, political, and economic terms will reduce rape is not supported. 3 Tables, 55 References. Finkelhor, David and Kersti Yllo. _License to Rape: Sexual Abuse of Wives_. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1985; Free Press, New York, 1987.
Gauthier and Saucier. "Preliminary Study of Early Sexual Abuse." Canadian _Journal of Psychiatry_. 1991. v36 n6 p422. (In French) This paper is in french, but they have an English abstract in Medline. They compared ually abused adolescents with non-abused. From the abstract: "...[of abused children] their perception of self and of the ideal self was not affected by the ual abuse, a finding that will spark discussion."
Griffin, Susan. _The Politics of Rape_. Third revision and updated edition. Harper and Row, San Francisco, 1986. Original copyright 1970. "Another canon in the apologetics of rape is that, if it were not for learned social controls, all men would rape."..."But in truth rape is not universal to the human species."
Griffin, Susan. "Rape: The All-American Crime" in _Rape: The Power of Consciousness_, Harper & Row, 1979.
Haber, Joel D. "Abused Women and Chronic Pain," in _American Journal of Nursing_, v85, Sept. 1985, pp1010-1012. Study shows that abused women have more health problems than non-abused ones.
Jones, Anne. _Women Who Kill_. Fawcett Crest, Ballantine Books, New York. 1981. From blurb: "When battered and abused women began to fight back -- and kill --- men began to fear that this would becom an epidemic. Some felt that women were getting away with murder: But were they? They were not. In fact, in many cases their punishment was harsher than that of men. But this book is much more than a desription of battered women who kill in self-defense. It is a social history and a fascinating story of women on the edge of society -- women driven to kill for a multitude of reasons. Here are tales of crime and punishment that reveal hard truths about American society and women's place in it." Kelly, Liz. _Surviving Sexual Violence_. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis; Polity Press, Cambridge UK. 1988.
Kilpatrick, D.G. et al., "Mental health correlates of criminal victimization. A random community survey," _Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology_, Vol. 53, 866-873. 1985.
Koss, M.P. "Hidden rape. ual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education." Chapter 1. In A.W. Burgess, ed, _Rape and ual assault II_ (pp. 3-25). NY. Garland. 1988. Controversial. This was a study that showed a good percentage of the men surveyed believed certain things could be expected if they paid for dinner, etc. There were questions designed in such a way that would find out if the men had raped without using the word rape. They would answer yes to these questions but no to the questions containing the word rape.
McFarlane, Judith. "Violence During Teen Pregnancy: Health Consequences for Mother and Child," in Levy, Barrie, ed, _Dating Violence_, Seal Press, 1991, pp136-141. A study that found 26% of prengant teens were currently in an abusive relationship; many noted the abuse began when the pregnancy did.
Mercy JA., Saltzman LE., Intentional Injury Section, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333. May 1989. "Fatal violence among spouses in the United States," 1976-85. _American Journal of Public Health_. 79(5).595-9. Abstract. In this paper we examine patterns and trends in homicides between marriage partners in the United States for 1976 through 1985 using data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Supplemental Homicide Reports (FBI-SHR). We identified 16,595 spouse homicides accounting for 8.8 per cent of all homicides reported to the FBI-SHR during this 10-year period. The rate of spouse homicide for this 10-year period was 1.6 per 100,000 married persons. The risk of being killed by one's spouse was 1.3 times greater for wives than for husbands. Black husbands were at greater risk of spouse homicide victimization than Black wives or White spouses of either . The risk of victimization was greater for spouses in interracial than in intraracial marriages and increased as age differences between spouses increased. From 1976 through 1985, the risk of spouse homicide declined by more than 45.0 per cent for both Black husbands and wives but remained relatively stable for White husbands and wives. Demographic patterns in the risk of spouse homicide were similar to those reported for nonfatal spouse abuse suggesting that the causes of spouse homicide and nonfatal spouse abuse may be similar.
Morgan, Robin. _The Demon Lover: On the Sexuality of Terrorism_. W.W. Norton and Company. 1989. ISBN: 0-393-02642-6 (hardback). Controversial. Blurb: "Something in each of us, no matter how we deny it and no matter how much we may deplore terrorist tactics, is fascinated by the terrorist. We might even ambivalently admire such a figure: a fanatic of dedication, a mixture of volatile impetuosity and severe discipline, an archetype of self-sacrifice. ...In this brilliant marriage of theory and personal experience, Robin Morgan...sets forth the first feminist analysis of the phenomenon of terrorism."
Quigley, Paxton. _Armed and Female_. E.P. Dutton, New York. 1989. Paperback may be ordered from Second Amendment Foundation, 12500 NE Tenth Place, Bellavue WA 98005 for US$5.00, includes postage. Former anti-gun activist tells why she joined millions of other women in choosing a firearm for self-defense.
Randall, Teri. "Domestic Violence Intervention Calls for More than Treating Injuries," in _Journal of the American Medical Association_, 264(8), August 22-29, 1990, pp939-940. "Battery appears to be the single most common cause of injury to women -- more common that automobile accidents, muggings and rapes combined."
Russell, Diana H. _Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, and Workplace Harassment_. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. 1984.
Russell, Diana E. H. and Nancy Howell. "The Prevalence of Rape in the United States Revisited," _Signs_, 8(4). 688-695, 1983. Lead author is in the Department of Social Sciences, Mills College, Oakland CA, and has written several books on ual violence. According to survey findings, assuming that the rape rate remains the same, there is a 26% probability that woman will be the victim of a completed rape, increasing to 46% for attempted rape.
Seng. "Child Sexual Abuse and Adolescent Prostitution: A Comparative Study." _Adolescence_. 1989. v24 n95(really 95??) p665. Abstract: "...findings suggest that the relationship [abuse>prostitution] is not directed, but invokes runaway behavior as an intervening variable. It is not so much that ual abuse leads to prostitution as it is that running away leads to prostitution." Scully, Diana. _Understanding Sexual Violence: A Study of Convicted Rapists_. Series: Perspectives on Gender, vol 3. Unwin Hyman, Boston. 1990.
Stark, Evan, Anne Flitcraft and William Frazier. "Medicine and Patriarchal Violence: The Social Construction of a 'Private' Event," in _International Journal of Health Services_, 9(3), 1979, pp461-493. A study that found that medical records included the labels "neurotic," "hysteric," "hypochondriac," or "a well-known patient with multiple vague complaints" for one in four battered women compared to one in fifty non-battered women; one in four battered women are given pain medications/tranquilizers as compared to one in ten non-battered women.
Strauss, M.A., Gelles, R.J., and Steinmetz, S.K. _Behind closed doors: Violence in American families_. Doubleday, New York, 1980. Followup work "Intimate Violence" (no detailed reference). These studies show that spousal violence levels are relatively independent of gender. They do not, however, include any consideration of motivation or the issues of 'self defense'.
Warshaw, Robin. _I Never Called It Rape: The Ms. report on Recognizing, Fighting, and Surviving Date and Acquaintance Rape_. Afterword by Mary P. Koss. Harper and Row, New York. 1988.
Wolfgang Marvin E., _Patterns in Criminal Homicide_. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 1958. Also (*Curtis 1974), (*Mercy & Saltzman 1989). The situation appears to bethat the rate that men kill women and that women kill men, and also the rate at which husbands kill wives and wives kill husbands, are nearly *equal* when looked at from a mortality point of view, and ignoring the issue of 'who started it'.
Yllo, Kerst, and Michele Bograd, eds. _Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse_. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. 1988. Includes important discussion of what statistics can or cannot show. Bibliographies.
_National Crime Survey_ (NCS) This is an attempt to measure the actual victimization rates of how often people are affected by crimes. The survey is given to a population representative of all people over 12 years of age who live in a residence. There are two parts to the survey. a screening to determine who has been the victim of a crime; and a detailed questionnaire given to victims. The detailed questionnaire includes the details and date of the crime, and helps insure that crimes are classified properly (e.g., crimes falling outside the survey 'time window' are properly excluded). It is a large scale survey, covering approximately 60,000 households with 101,000 people. Approximately 96% of the selected population agreed to participate in the survey.
_Statistical Abstracts of the U.S. - 1990_. Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), put out yearly. Cites the incidence of reported forcible rape as 37.6 per 100,000 total (i.e., men and women) population.
_Uniform Crime Report_ (UCR) Based solely on police reports and is not intended to be a statistical measure of victimization The Uniform Crime Report is based on police reports. The data given by the UCR includes _only_ murder, not killings in self defense or deaths due to negligence - and the interpretation of which is which is left to the officer filing the report.
_Uniform Crime Statistics_ (UCS, from the FBI) This derives the "one in four" figure given for the rate of rape among women. It used to be "one in five" until the FBI decided that marital rape counted as rape (in the mid 1980s). The FBI's definition of rape involves penetration of any orifice without consent. 1 in 4 is the rate at which girls are ually abused (rape and molestation); 1 in 6 is the rate at which the same occurs for boys.
22. Sexual Harassment and Discrimination. ------------------------------------------
Baker, Douglas D., David E. Terpstra, and Kinley Larantz. "The Influence of Individual Characteristics and Severity of Harassing Behavior on Reactions to Sexual Harassment", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 5/6 (1990) 305-325.
Bem, Sandra L. and Daryl J. Bem. "Does Sex-biased Job Advertising 'Aid and Abet' Sex Discrimination?", _Journal of Applied Social Psychology_, 3 (1973): 6-18.
Chestler, Phyllis. [book review in psychology today, statistics on child custody awards]
Dale, R.R. _Mixed or Single- Schools_. Vols. I & II. 1969. Wide range of research on secondary schools.
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, and William J. Goode, eds. _The other half; roads to women's equality_. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1971. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, and Rose Laub Coser, eds. _Access to power : cross-national studies of women and elites_. Allen & Unwin, London and Boston. 1981. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. _Deceptive distinctions : , gender, and the social order_. Yale University Press, New Haven; Russell Sage Foundation, New York. c1988. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. _Woman's place; options and limits in professional careers_. University of California Press, Berkeley. 1970.
*Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. "Bringing Women In: Rewards, Punishments, and the Structure of Achievement", pages 13-22.
Game, Ann and Rosemary Pringle. _Gender at Work_. Allen and Unwin, Sydney and Boston. 1983. Sex discrimination in employment against women in Australia.
*Goldberg, Philip, "Are Women Prejudiced Against Women?", _Trans- Action_, 5 (1986), 28-80. [am not sure what "Trans-Action" is]
Gornick, Vivian and Barbara K. Moran, eds. _Women in Sexist Society_. New York: Basic Books, 1972.
Kaschak, Ellyn. "Sex Bias in Student Evaluations of College Professors", _Psychology of Women Quarterly_, 2 (1978), 235-242.
LaPlante, Alice. "Sexist Images Persist at Comdex", _Infoworld_, November 27, 1989, page 58.
Lattin, Patricia Hopkins. "Academic Women, Affirmative Action, and Middle-America in the Eighties", in Resa L. Dudovitz, ed., _Women in Academe_. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1984. 223-230.
MacKinnon, Catharine. _Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination_. Yale University Press, New Haven. 1979.
MacKinnon, Catharine. "Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law," in _Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review_. Vol. 20, no. 2. 1985.
Paludi, Michele A. and William D. Bauer. "Goldberg Revisited: What's in an Author's Name", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 9 (1983) 387- 390.
Paludi, Michele A. and Lisa A. Strayer. "What's in an Author's Name? Different Evaluations of Performance as a Function of Author's Name", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 12 (1985) 353-361.
Pringle, Rosemary. _Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work_, Verso, New York and London. 1989. Sex discrimination and ual harrassment of women.
Rowe, Mary P. "Barriers to Equality: The Power of Subtle Discrimination to Maintain Unequal Opportunity", _Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal_, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1990. 153-163.
Rowe, Mary P. "Dealing with Sexual Harassment", _Harvard Business Review_, May-June 1981, 42-47.
Russ, Joanna. _How to Suppress Women's Writing_. University of Texas Press, 1983, ISBN 0-292-72445-4 (pbk). This book analyzes the multitude of subtle and not-so-subtle ways in which women writers have been given less than full credit for their work throughout history. It is the perfect companion volume to Ellen Moers's _Literary Women_.
Sadker, Myra and David Sadker. "Sexism in the Schoolroom of the 80's", _Psychology Today_, March 1985.
Selvin, Paul. "Does the Harrison Case Reveal Sexism in Math?", _Science_ 252 (June 28, 1991), 1781-1783.
Simeone, Angela. _Academic Women: Working Towards Equality_. Bergin and Garvey Publishers, Inc., Massachusetts. 1987.
Sproull, Lee, Sara Kiesler, and David Zubrow, eds. "Encountering an Alien Culture", in _Computing and Change on Campus_. Cambridge University Press, UK. 1987, pages 173-194.
Stewart, Elizabeth, Nancy Hutchinson, Peter Hemmingway, and Fred Bessai. "The Effects of Student Gender, Race, and Achievement on Career Exploration Advice Given by Canadian Preservice Teachers", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 21 (1989) 247-262.
Sumrall, Amber Coverdale and Dena Taylor, eds. _Sexual Harassment: Women Speak Out_. The Crossing Press, Freedom, CA 95019, 1992. ISBN 0-89594-544-4. ($10.95) Highly recommended. This book consists of short (2-4 pages) essays by women about their experiences with Sexual Harassment, everything from taunts and whistles to rape and other physical abuse. Stories are interspersed with comics drawn by women and some poetry. Many of the stories describe the early conditioning that women receive that makes us put up with so much. The book is dedicated to Anita Hill.
Top, Titia J., "Sex Bias in the Evaluation of Performance in the Scientific, Artistic, and Literary Professions: A Review.", Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 24 (1991) 73-106.
Weinraub, Marsha and Lynda M. Brown, "The Development of Sex- Role Stereotypes in Children: Crushing Realities", Franks and Rothblum, editors, _The Stereotyping of Women: Its Effects on Mental Health_, Springer Publishing Company, New York. 1983, pages 30-58.
Weitzman, Lenore. _The Marriage Contract_.
"...child care decisions. Twentieth century case law has established the presumption that prefers mothers as the custodians of their children after divorce, particularly if the children are of "tender years." [Mnookin, "Custody Adjudication," p. 235.] This maternal presumption WAS ESTABLISHED ALMOST ENTIRELY THROUGH JUDICIAL DECISIONS RATHER THAN BY STATUTES. For while most statues have put the wife on an equal footing with the husband, and have instructed the courts to award custody in the best interest of the child, judges typically have held that *it is in the child's best interest not to be separated from the mother* --unless she has been shown to be unfit. [Ibid.]
"The child's best interest" has thus evolved into a judicially constructed presumption that the love and nurturance of a fit mother is always in the child's (and society's) best interest. The result has been a consistent pattern of decisions that both justify and further reinforce the maternal presumption....
"Over the past fifty years the assumption that the mother is the natural and proper custodian of the children has been so widely accepted that it has rarely been questioned, and even more rarely challenged. As Alan Roth asserts, many of the rationales offered by the courts for the maternal preference have the ring of divine-right doctrine [Alan Roth, "The Tender Years Presumption in Child Custody Disputes," _Journal_of_Family_Law_ 15, no. 3 (1972)]"
"More recently the social science adduced to support the maternal presumption has been challenged, but the presumption itself has been considered wise because it avoids "the social costs" of contested cases. [See, for example, R. Levy and P. Ellsworth "Legislative Reform of Child Custody Adjudication," _Law_and_Society_Review_, Nov. 1969, p. 4]
23. Test Biases. -----------------
Brush, Stephen. _ibid_. When the SAT is used by college admissions to predict academic performance, it underpredicts the grades of women compared with those on men. If a man and a woman have the same SAT scores, the woman will tend to get higher grades in college. Thus an admissions process that gives the SAT significant weight will reject some women who would have done better than men who were accepted.
In a reply to letters to the editor in the Jan-Feb 1992 _American Scientist_, Brush wrote:
[A]ccording to Phyllis Rosser's study, "The SAT Gender Gap," the following question was answered correctly by males 27 percent more often than by females (a difference of 6 percent is significant to the 0.05 level of confidence). A high school basketball team has won 40 percent of its first 15 games. Beginning with the 16th game, how many games in a row does the team now have to win in order to have a 55 percent winning record? A) 3 B) 5 C) 6 D) 11 E) 15 With a strict time limit, the advantage goes to students who can quickly guess and verify the right answer without having to set up the equation first.
Rosser, Phillis. "The SAT Gender Gap. Identifying the Causes," (Washington, D.C.: Center for Women Policy Studies, 1989). According to Phyllis Rosser, much of the SAT gender gap is an artifact of -biased test questions. Rosser points out that men have always received higher scores, on average, but their advantage in the mathematics part of the test was once offset by women's higher scores on the verbal part. Women lost this compensating factor in the early 1970s because of the gradual introduction of test questions about science, business and "practical affairs," and the elimination of some questions about human relations, the arts, and the humanities. There was no compensating change in the mathematics section.
Block, Ned, ed. _The IQ Controversy_. Information on biases of all sorts found in IQ tests.
24. Women of Color. -------------------- Anzaldua, Gloria. _Borderlands: The New Mestiza = La Frontera_. Spinsters/Aunt Lute, San Francisco. 1987.
Anzaldua, Gloria, ed. _Making face, making soul = Haciendo caras : creative and critical perspectives by women of color_. Aunt Lute Foundation Books, San Francisco. c1990.
Collins, Patricia Hill. _Black Feminist Thought_. Unwin Hyman, Boston. 1990. Series title: Perspectives on Gender; v. 2. Maps out standpoint epistemology from African American feminist perspective. May also include under feminist epistemology. Davis, Angela. _Women, Race, and Class_. Random House, New York, 1981.
DuBois, Ellen Carol and Vicki L. Ruiz, eds. _Unequal Sisters. A Multi-Cultural Reader in U.S. Women's History_. Routledge, New York. 1990. Excellent collection of articles, many historical studies and some narratives.
Hooks, Bell. _Ain't I A Woman_. South End Press, 116 St. Botolph St., Boston, Mass. 02115. 1981. ISBN 0-89608-128-1. Examines the impact of ism on black women during slavery, the historic devaluation of black womanhood, black male ism, racism within the recent women's movement, and black women's involvement with feminism. The title comes from an address on the subject given by Sojourner Truth.
Hooks, Bell. _Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black_. South End Press, Boston. 1989.
Moraga, Cherrie, and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. _This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color_. Persephone Press, Watertown, MA, 1981. Kitchen Table Press, New York, 1983. Anthology of writings by women of color. Smith, Barbara, ed. _Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology_. First edition. Kitchen Table -- Women of Color Press, New York. 1983.
25. Women's Health. --------------------
Boston Women's Health Book Collective. _Our Bodies, Ourselves_. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1973. A very practical guide to women & our bodies.
Boston Women's Health Collective. _The New Our Bodies, Ourselves_. Simon and Schuster, New York. 1984. Updated.
Boston Women's Health Collective. _Our Bodies, Ourselves. Growing Older_. Oriented toward the 40+ crowd.
ACT UP/New York Women and AIDS Book Group. _Women, AIDS, and Activisim_. South End Press, Boston, MA. 1990. New book on women and aids and politics.
Corea, Gena. _The Hidden Malpractice_. A (sometimes alarmist) look at how medical practices overlooks and mistreats women.
Raymond, Janice G., Renate Klein, and Lynette J. Dumble. _RU 486: Misconceptions, Myths and Morals_. Institute on Women and Technology, Cambridge, MA. 1991. Abortion, moral and ethical aspects; medical ethics. Includes bibliographical references.
(Auto)Biographies. ------------------
Bateson, Mary Catherine. _Composing a Life_. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-452-26505-3 (paperback, $9.95). Bateson profiles five women in a wide variety of fields in an examination of how their careers happened to develop the way they did.
Bennett, Betty T, )Mary Diana Dods, A Gentleman and a Scholar_. William Morrow and Company, New York. 1991. ISBN 0-688-08717-5 (hardcover).
Komisar, Lucy. _Corazon Aquino: The Story of a Revolution_. G. Braziller, New York. 1987.
Marlow, Joan. _The Great Women_. A&W Publishers, New York. 1979. ISBN: 0-89479-056-0. A compilation of 60 women of diverse ages and nations.
Moers, Ellen, ed. _Literary Women_. Reprint. The Great Writers series. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985. Copywrite 1977. Describes women authors.
Morgan, Robin. _Going Too Far: The Personal Chronicle of a Feminist_. Random House, New York. 1977.
Perl, Teri. _Math Equals: Biographies of Women Mathematicians and Related Activities_. Addison-Wesley. 1978.
Miscellaneous. --------------
"Women on the Verge of an Athletic Showdown" in _Science News_, Jan 11, 1992, Vol 141, No. 2, p 141. Female track athletes are improving their performances at faster rates than men and, if the trend continues, should be running marathons as fast as men by 1998, says Brian J. Whipp, a physiologist at the University of California, Lost Angeles. He and UCLA co-worker Susan A. Ward predict that women will catch up with men in most track events by early next century.
Adrian, M.J.: _Sports Women_. Medicine and Sport Science Vol. 24 Interesting essays ranging from physiology to Ancient Greece.
Chopin, Kate, _The Awakening_. Capricorn Books. 1964. Garrett Press, Inc., New York, 1970. Norton, New York, 1976. Women's Press, London 1979.
Cixous, Helene and Catharine Clement. _The Newly Born Woman_. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 1986. (Published in French in 1975).
Dyer, K.F.: _Catching up the Men -- Women in Sport_. Junction Books (UK), 1982. ISBN 086245-075-X. This book debunks a lot of myths about female inferiority and fragility by careful investigation and documentation, another must read.
Ehrenreich, Barbara and Deirdre English, "For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women", New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1978.
|Kramarae and Treichler: _A Feminist Dictionary_. 1985. | Defines many things from a feminist's point of view. Includes | a good deal of history, figures in the movement, etc.
Lenskij, Helen: _Out of Bounds: Women, Sport and Sexuality_. Women's Press, Toronto, 1986. ISBN 0-88961-105-X. Very powerful book about the 20th century changes in how female uality, gender roles, and the waves of female athleticism have been perceived, and about how these factors influence each other. A must read.
Mangan/Park (Eds.): _From Fair Sex to Feminism_. Frank Cass & Company Lim. 1987. ISBN 0-7146-4049-2.
|Marine, Gene: _A Male Guide to Women's Liberation_. 1972.
Sabo/Runfola (Eds.): _Jock -- Sports & Male Identity_. Spectrum/Prentice-Hall 1980. ISBN 0-13-510131-X. This book also contains several essays on female identity and sports.
Steinem, Gloria. _Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions_. _Revolution from Within: A Book of Self-Esteem_ This is a collection of articles and essays written by her that was published sometime in the early 1980's. Some of them are a result of her earlier career as a journalist. The articles cover such things as: * Her becoming a Playboy Bunny (seriously!) in the early 1960's. * The presidential campaigns of 1968 and 1972. * "If Men Could Menstruate", a satirical piece in the vein of "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament". * What present-day anti-abortionists have in common with Nazi Germany.
Tuana, Nancy, ed. _Rereading the Canon_. Series. Penn State Press. This new series will consist of edited collections of essays, some original and some previously published, offering feminist reinterpretations of the writings of major figures in the Western philosophical tradition. Each volume will contain essays covering the full range of a single philosopher's thought and representing the diversity of approaches now being used by feminist critics. The series will begin with a volume on Plato; other early volumes will focus on Aristotle, Locke, Marx, Wittgenstein, de Beauvoir, Foucault, and Derrida. Inquiries should be directed to Nancy Tuana, School of Arts and Humanities, University of Texas at Dallas, Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688.
|Tuttle, Lisa: _Encyclopedia of Feminism_. 1986.
Velden, Lee van der & James H. Humphrey: Psychology and sociology of sport, vol. 1. AMS Press Inc., NY 1986. ISBN 0-404-63401-X.
Woolf, Virginia. _Three Guineas_. 1938. Extensively reprinted. Written 50 years ago and sadly still very relevant. Woolf, Virginia. _A Room of One's Own_. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1981, c1957.
Winterson, Jeanette. _Oranges are not the only fruit_. Pandora Press (Unwin Hyman Limited, 15-17 Broadwick SAtreet, London). 1987.
Acknowledgments. ----------------
My thanks to: Joseph Albert, Leslie Anderson, Rich Berlin, Mik Bickis, Anita Borg, Ed Blachman, Bob Blackshaw, Cindy Blank-Edelman, L.A. Breene, Janet L. Carson, Robert Coleman, Mats Dahlgren, David desJardins, Jublie DiBiase, Jym Dyer, Ellen Eades, Marc R. Ewing, Ronnie Falcao, Lisa Farmer, Sharon Fenick, Bob Freeland, Debbie Forest, Susan Gerhart, Jonathan Gilligan, Thomas Gramstad, Ron Graham, David Gross, Mary W. Hall, Stacy Horn, Kathryn Huxtable, Joel Jones, Bonita Kale, Joanne M. Karohl, Corinna Lee, Nancy Leveson, lip@s1.gov (Loren), Jim Lippard, Albert Lunde, Jill Lundquist, Brian McGuinness, Fanya S. Montalvo, Tori Nasman, Mirjana Obradovic, Vicki O'Day, Diane L. Olsen, Joann Ordille, Jan Parcel, J. Rollins, Stewart Schultz, Mary Shaw, Anne Sjostrom, Ellen Spertus, Jon J. Thaler, Dave Thomson, Carolyn Turbyfill, Sarah Ullman, Max Meredith Vasilatos, Bronis Vidiguris, Paul Wallich, Sharon Walter, Karen Ward, Marian Williams, Celia Winkler, Michael Winston Woodring, Sue J. Worden, and Daniel Zabetakis.
Especial thanks to the MLVL library catalogue system.
--------------
Please mail in comments, additions, corrections, suggestions, and so on to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu.
--Cindy Tittle Moore
"If an aborigine drafted an IQ test, for example, all of Western Civilization would probably flunk."
|
|
 | | From: | Cindy Tittle Moore | | Subject: | soc.feminism References (part 2 of 3) | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:29:43 GMT |
|
|
 | Archive-name: feminism/refs2 Version: 2.2 Last-modified: 15 February 1993
Copies of this FAQ may be obtained by anonymous ftp to rtfm.mit.edu under /pub/usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs2. Or, send email to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs1 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs2 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs3 in the body of the message, leaving the subject line empty.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[1-8 in part I] 9. History. 10. Implications of Beauty. 11. Lesbian Feminism. 12. Literary Writings. 13. Media Depiction of Women. 14. Military, Law Enforcement. 15. Patriarchy. 16. Pornography. 17. Positive Children's Books. [18-25 in part III]
[continuing from part I]
9. History. ------------
Adamson, Nancy, Linda Briskin, and Margaret McPhail. _Feminist Organizing For Change: The Contemporary Women's Movement in Canada_. Oxford University Press (Don Mills, Ontario). 1988. Blurb: "Beginning with a detailed history of the `second wave' (post-1960), it makes a primary distinction between grass-roots and institutionalized feminism, and by emphasizing the former reveals a part of feminist organizing that has most often been invisible."
Anderson, Bonnie S. and Judith P. Zinsser. _A History of Their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to Present_. Vols I and II. Harper and Row, Publishers, New York. 1988. Blurb: "...A groundbreaking and controversial history of European women -- the first to approach the past from the perspective of women and to be organized by role."
Bridenthal, Renate, and Claudia Koonz, eds. _Becoming Visible, Women in European History_. An anthology going from prehistory to present day.
Carden, Maren. _The New Feminist Movement_. 1974.
Coote and Campbell. _Sweet Freedom: The Struggle for Women's Liberation_. 1982.
DuBois, Ellen Carol and Vicki L. Ruiz, eds. _Unequal Sisters: A Multi- Cultural Reader in U.S. Women's History_. Routledge, New York. 1990.
DuBoise, Ellen Carol. _Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America 1848-1869_. Third printing. Cornell Paperbacks, Cornell University Press. 1985. ISBN: 0-8014-9182-7 (trade paperback). Blurb: "...Duboise provides a framework and an analysis which link present concerns with political events more than a century ago, and by so doing illuminates both our contemporary situation and our past. Hers is a rare blend of relevance and solid scholarship..."
Eisler, Riane. _The Chalice and the Blade_. Harper, San Francisco. 1987. An interesting revisionist view of history; describes a conflict between "gylanic" (cooperative, giving of life honored, stereotypically feminine) and "androcratic" (competitive, taking of life honored, stereotypically masculine) tendencies in Western history. She suggests that the problem with the latter system is not men _per se_, but the expectation that men dominate women and a few men dominate all the rest. She follows Marija Gimbutas on European prehistory, suggesting that her "Old Europe" was a good example of the former system. Caution: any attempt at finding all-encompassing principles, as she does, is probably an oversimplification.
Fraser, Antonia. _The Weaker Vessel_. Vintage Books, Random House, New York. 1985. ISBN: 0-394-73251-0. Blurb: "Fraser gives us life after woman's life in choice and telling detail. This is 'hidden history'...the history of ordinary women, and therefore of ordinary men. As such it is both tantalizingly familliar and utterly exotic, close and yet distant to our own lives."
Fraser, Antonia. _The Warrior Queens_. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 1989. ISBN: 0-394-54939-2 (hardback). Blurb: "...Fraser gives us a singularly rich and provocative study of the Warrior Queens. Dramatising the often astonishing ways in which the world has perceived -- and still perceives -- women who wield power, she examines the paradox and the politics, the mythic and the real lives of the sovereign women who have led their nations in war."
Gimbuta, Marija. _The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe_. c1974, 1982. Documents Neolithic Europe in detail, describing such things as settlement patterns, burial rites, a sacred script and inferences on its social structure. She proposes that "Old Europe" featured parity between the es, lack of interest in warfare, well-developed artistic traditions, and a belief system centered on female generative powers.
Gimbuta, Marija. _The Language of the Goddess_(1989) and _The Civilization of the Goddess_(1991). Harper, San Francisco. Expands on the belief system proposed in the first book.
Goreau, Angeline, ed. _The Whole Duty of a Woman: Female Writers in Seventeenth Century England_. Dial Press, Garden City, New York. 1985.
Heilbrun, Carolyn G. _Writing a Woman's Life_. Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-36256-X. Blurb: "With subtlety and great eloquence, Carolyn Heilbrun shows how, throughout the centuries, those who write about women's lives -- biographers AND autobiographers -- have suppressed the truth of the female experience, in order to make the "written life" conform to society's expectations of what that life should be."
Hiley, Michael. _Victorian Working Women: Portraits from Life_. Gordon Fraser, London. 1979. A collection of Arther Munby's photography. It was his firm belief that women should be free to take on any job they wished. A fascinating compendium.
Karlsen, Carol F. _The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England_. W.W. Norton and Company, New York and London. 1987. Blurb: "A pioneer work in what might be called the structuring of society. this is not just another book about witchcraft. Carol Karlsen has uncovered the assumptions, explicit and implicit, that goverened the everyday relationships of men and women in early New England...The 'witches' come alive in this book, not as stereotypes, but as real women living in a society that suspected and feared their independence and combativeness."
Miles, Rosalind. _The Women's History of the World_. Perennial Library, Harper and Row, Publishers. 1990. ISBN: 0-06-097317-X.
Rossi, Alice S., ed. _The Feminist Papers: From Adams to de Beauvoir_. 1st Northeastern University Press ed. Boston : Northeastern University Press, 1988, c1973. Reprint. Originally published: New York : Columbia University Press, 1973. Women, feminism and history: sources.
Rothschild, Joan, ed. _Women, Technology, and Innovation_. Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York. 1982. Includes bibliography. Discusses technology and innovation on the part of women throughout history, with essays on current feminist thought on pedagogy and technology.
Scharff, Virginia. _Taking the Wheel: Women and the Coming of the Motor Age_. The Free Press, Macmillian, Inc. 1991. ISBN: 0-02928135-0. Blurb: "Most men did not want or expect women to drive the new gasoline powered automobiles of the early 1900's. Women took the wheel anyway. As Virginia Scharff explains in this engaging survey, the constraints of gender affected the ways in which women met the new automotive technology but seldom slowed them down. Car culture, Scharff shows with her precise scholarship and thoughtful commentarty, was women's culture, too."
Scott, Joan Wallach. _Gender and the Politics of History_. Series title: Gender and Culture. Columbia University Press, New York. 1988. She uses postructural philosophies (Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida - the latter almost considered the father of postructuralism) to analyse Gender and the way that History has been written. She "deconstructs" the texts hoping to find their biases, and so understand why they cannot be "correct," taking the position that history has repressed what it means to be a woman.
Sullivan, Sorayan, translator. _Stories by Iranian Women_. Introduction by Fazaneh Milani. Center for Middle Eastern Studies. University of Texas at Austin. ISBN: 0-292-77649-7.
Wilson, Katharina M., ed. _Women Writers of the Renaissance and Reformation_. University of Georgia Press. ISBN: 0-8203-0866-8.
Wilson, Vincent Jr. _The Book of Distinguished American Women_. American HIstory Research Associates, PO BOX 140, Brookeville, MD 20833, 1983. ISBN 0-910086-05-2. (100p paperback) Brief but inspiring biographies of 50 (!) women who made names for themselves in fields from astronomy to public health to literature.
10. Implications of Beauty. ---------------------------
Brownmiller, Susan. _Femininity_. Fawcett Columbine, New York. 1984. ISBN: 0-449-90142-4 (trade paperback). A mild (for Brownmiller) but earnest book that explores the effect that demands of "femininity" have on women. Freedman, Rita. _Beauty Bound_. Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company. 1988. ISBN: 0-669-11141-4 (hardback). Explores the effects that conventional notions of beauty and womens' efforts to meet them have on women.
Wolf, Naomi. _The Beauty Myth_. Chatto & Windus, London, 1991. W. Morrow, New York, 1991. Examines the impact that conventional notions of feminine beauty have on women from a feminist perspective.
11. Lesbian Feminism. ---------------------- Darty, Trudy and Sandee Potter, eds. _Women-Identified Women_. Mayfield Pub. Co., Palo Alto, CA. 1984.
Faderman, Lillian. _Surpassing the Love of Men: Romantic Friendship and Love between Women from the Renaissance to the Present_ New York: Quill (A division of William Morrow & Co.), 1981.
Faderman, Lillian. _Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers: A History of Lesbian Life in Twentieth Century America_.
Pharr, Suzanne. _Homophobia: A Weapon Of Sexism_. Chardon Press, Inverness, CA. 1988. If there is anyone out there who *doesn't* understand the connection between homophobia and ism, I urge that person to read this fairly short book. Phelan, Shane. _Identity Politics: Lesbian Feminism and the Limits of Community_. Series Title: Women in the Political Economy. Temple University Press, Philadelphia. 1989. Rich, Adrienne. _On Compulsory Heterouality and Lesbian Existence_. Onlywomen Press, London, 1981; Antelope Publications, Denver Co., 1982. First appeared in _Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society_, Vol. 5, no. 5, 1980.
Douglas, Carol Anne. _Love and Politics: Radical Feminist and Lesbian Theories_. Ism Press, San Francisco, 1990.
12. Literary Writings. -----------------------
Atwood, Margaret. _The Handmaid's Tale_. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1986. ISBN 0395404258. Description of future in which women's reproduction is completely state-controlled.
Charnas, Suzy McKee. _Walk to the End of the World_. In _Radical Utopias_, Quality Paperback Book Club, New York, 1990. Charnas has also written excellent young adult fiction (_The Bronze King_, etc). This is an exploration of a post-apolcalyptic world, in which women are blamed for the apocolypse and treated accordingly.
Delany, Samuel R. _Triton_. In _Radical Utopias_, Quality Paperback Book Club, New York, 1990. An exploration of gender and gender roles set in the future.
Lefanu, Sarah. _Feminism and Science Fiction_. Indiana University Press. 1989. ISBN: 0-253-23100-0. From back: "Through intriguing literary criticism of the works of writers such as Joanna Russ, Ursula Le Guin, Suzy McKee Charnas, James Tiptree, Jr., and Josephine Saxton, Lefanu explores the ways in which feminsit ideas have been stealthily at work, subverting male authority in one of its strongholds." A penetrating and very interesting book.
LeGuin, Ursula K. _The Left Hand of Darkness_. Ace Science Fiction Books, New York. c1969. 29th printing, 1984. ISBN: 0-441-47810-7 (paperback). Constructs a world inhabited by non-gendered people that shift from one to the other only for purposes of reproduction. A fascinating exploration of gender, gender roles, and gender identity. Lyrical and well written. LeGuin, Ursula K. _Dancing at the Edge of the World: Thoughts on Words, Women, Places_. Perennial Library, Harper & Row, Publishers. 1989. ISBN 0-06-097289-0. A collection of articles written by the author. Well worth reading.
Russ, Joanna. "When It Changed." Originally published in _Again, Dangerous Visions_ edited by Harlan Ellison, in 1972. It was reprinted in _Kindred Spirits_ edited by Jeffrey M. Elliot, in 1984 (Alyson Publications). Also reprinted in _The Arbor House Treasury of Science Fiction_ compiled by Robert Silverberg and Martin H. Greenberg (Arbor House, New York, 1980, ISBN 0-87795-246-9). From introduction in Arbor House edition: "The planet that is the setting for Ms. Russ's story is completely devoid of men, and although this situation has been dealt with in science fiction before, it was usually in the form of 'men to the rescue' and/or a reaffirmation of the 'natural' need of one for the other. This is not the case here. The physiological problmes of a single- situation have been solved and the social system and the satisfactions deriving therefrom are perfectly logical. Like all fine science fiction, 'When it Changed' has much to tell us about the present." (p 513).
Russ, Joanna. _The Female Man_. In _Radical Utopias_, Quality Paperback Book Club, New York, 1990. This is an extension of the work begun in "When it Changed."
Spender, Dale. _Mothers of the Novel: 100 Good Women Novelists before Jane Austen_. Pandora Press, 1986. ISBN 0-86358-081-5. Puts the lie to every thing you learned in high school and university literature classes about how only men create LITERATURE.
Tiptree, James Jr. [Alice Sheldon]. "The Women Men Don't See," in Silverberg, Robert and Martin H. Greenberg, eds, _THe Arbor House Treasury of Science Fiction. Arbor House, New York. 1980. ISBN 0-87795-246-9. From introduction: "We listen, but we don't hear. We see, but we don't understand. We reach, but we don't grasp. These human failings are a part of life for all of us and not always because of lack of effort or talent. Some things are mysterious, and life is the richer for it. Science fiction has always explored the things that are not what they seem and the things that are more than they appear to be, but rarely as disturbingly and profoundly as in this outstanding story by 'James Tiptree, Jr' (Alice Sheldon)."
13. Media Depiction of Women. ------------------------------
Mayor's Task Force on the Status of Women in Toronto. _Final Report: Issues: day care, birth control, health care, property law, ual discrimination, equal pay for work of equal value, advertising--degrading women, affirmative action, political power, recreation, etc. etc. [Toronto: The Task Force] 1974.
Adelson, Andrea, "Study Attacks Women's Roles in TV", The New York Times, November 19, 1990, page C18.
Courtney, Alice E. and Thomas W. Whipple. _Sex Stereotyping in Advertising_. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 1983.
Edwardsen, Mary, ed. _The Corporate Influence on the Images of Women in Advertising: A Transcript of Public Hearings Held by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, October 7 & 8, 1976, New York City_. The Center, New York, 1977.
Fraser, Laura. "Behind the New Abortion Scam: How the New Right Uses Deceptive Advertising and Heavy-Handed Tactics to Prevent Pregnant WOmen from Choosing and Abortion". _The San Francisco Bay Guardian_. Vol 20, no 39. (July 16-23, 1986).
Kilbourne, Jean, Joseph Vitagliano, Patricia Stallone. _Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women_. Videocassette. Cambridge Documentary Films, Cambridge, MA. 1979. A study of the psychological and ual themes that pervade today's advertising for products. With a mixture of fact, insight, humor, and outrage, we are shown just how easily we are led astray by these advertisements.
Kilbourne, Jean and Cambridge Documentary Films. Producer and Directory, Margaret Lazarus. _Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women_. Videocassette. Cambridge Documentary Films, Cambridge MA. 1987. Discusses the manner in which women are portrayed by advertising and the effects this has on women and their images of themselves.
*Komisar, Lucy, "The Image of Woman in Advertising"
Schwartz, L. A. and W. T. Markham, "Sex Stereotyping in Children's Toy Advertisements", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 12 (1985) 157-170.
14. Military, Law Enforcement. -------------------------------
The University Conversion Project, in the September 1992 issue, published a 32-page booklet with bibliographies, articles, list of organizations, and organizing ideas pertaining to the links between "Masculinity, War, Feminism and Non-Violence." Articles include "White Men in Ties Discussing Missile Size," by Carol Cohn, "Male Violence and Imperialism," by Lundy Bancroft, "Prostitution and the Military," by Suniti Kumar, etc. The Guide is available for $3 plus $1 postage from UCP, P.O. Box 748, Cambridge, MA 02142. You can get more information by calling (617) 354-9363 from 10am to 6pm.
*Edwards, Paul N., "The Army and the Microworld: Computers and the Politics of Gender Identity"
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. _Women in law_. Basic Books, New York, 1981; Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1983.
Stirling, S.M. "The Woman Warrior," in _New Destinies_, vol IV, Summer 1988. Baen Books. This is a well thought-out article by S.M. Stirling entitled _The Woman Warrior_. Stirling defends the idea of women serving in the military. This is a response to opinions expressed by editors who had negative comments about female warriors in fantasy stories. Although _New Destinies_ is aimed at science fiction readers, this article is factual and interesting. There is a list of references at the end of the article.
McNeil, D. G. "Should Women Be Sent Into Combat?" _The New York Times_, July 21, 1991, page E3. A summary of the arguments for and against allowing women to serve in combat positions. It includes the statistic that even with pregnancy leave, enlisted women spend less time off work that enlisted men.
15. Patriarchy. ----------------
Connel, R.W. _Gender and Power: Society, The Person, and Sexual Politics_. Stanford University Press. 1987.
Dinnerstein, Dorothy. _The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise_. Harper & Row, New York. 1976. Examines the roots of patriarchy.
Figes, Eva. _Patriarchal Attitudes: Women in Society_. Reprint. Persea Books, New York. 1986. ISBN: 0-89255-122-4 (trade paperback). Examines factors which have placed women in subservient roles in most societies, including Christianity, capitalism, Freud, and ual taboos. Millet, Kate. _Sexual Politics_. New edition. Touchstone Books, Simon and Schuster Inc. 1990 (orig. 1969). ISBN: 0-671-70740-X (trade paperback). From blurb: "With searing eloquence, it traces the evolution of the women's movement starting from 1830, focusing on the profound changes in fundamental values that were -- and are -- its goal. In the tradition of feminist criticism pioneered by Simone de Beauvoir and Doris Lessing, Millett examines four key figures -- D.H. Lawrence, Henry Miller, Norman Mailer, and Jean Genet -- to illuminate how patriarchial bias and myth are reflected in the exploitation of women in literature."
Perelberg, Rosine Josef, and Ann C. Miller, eds. _Gender and Power in Families_. Tavistock/Routledge, London and New York. 1990.
Sargent, Lydia, ed. _Women and Revolution. A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism_. South End Press, Boston, 1981. Pluto Press, London, 1981. An edited collection of articles on the nature of the relationship between capitalism and patriarchy.
16. Pornography. -----------------
"Dealing With Pornography in Academia: Report on a Grassroots Action", CMU Computer Science Graduate Students and Staff. unpublished, 1989.
Baird, Robert M. and Stuart E. Rosenbaum, eds. _Pornography: Private Right or Public Menace?_. Prometheus Books. A wide and relatively unbiased collection of positions on graphy. Chapters are devoted to feminist, religious, and Libertarian perspectives. Some familiar names in the book: Brownmiller, Dworkin, and Steinem, as well as excerpts from the two US commission reports. Ben-Veniste, Richard. "Pornography and Sex Crime -- the Danish Experience." In Vol. 8, USCOP [U.S. Commision on Obscenity and Pornography] Technical Report, 1970.
Califia, Pat. "Among Us, Against Us: The New Puritans," in _The Advocate_ (4/17/80, 14-18); reprinted in _Caught Looking_ (recently reprinted) Also. "See No Evil: The Anti-Porn Movement," in _The Advocate_ (9/3/85, 35-39); and "The Obscene, Disgusting and Vile Meese Commission Report," in _The Advocate_ (10/14/86, 42-46, 108-109). Challenges to the well-known feminist anti-graphic and anti- stance.
Downs, Donald Alexander. _The New Politics of Pornography_. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1989. ISBN 0226161625. Explores the contemporary antigraphy movement, documents the weaknesses of both absolutist sides of the conflict. Dworkin, Andrea. _Woman Hating_. Dutton, New York, 1974.
Dworkin, Andrea. _Intercourse_. Free Press, New York, 1987.
Dworkin, Andrea. _Pornography: Men Possessing Women_. Dutton, New York, 1989.
Griffin, Susan. _Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her_. Harper and Row, New York, 1980. She contends that There are similarities between the ways men in patriarchal cultures treat "women" & "nature" and alienate themselves from both.
Griffin, Susan. _Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature_. Harper Colophon Books, New York, 1982.
Kuhn, Annette. _Women's Pictures: Feminism and Cinema_. Routledge & K. Paul, London and Boston, 1982. She feels that soft core graphy is more harmful to societal views on women than is hard core (hard core meaning "straight " films and not bondage/S&M/rape films).
Kutchinksy, Berl. "Towards an Explanation of the Decrease in Registered Sex Crimes in Copenhagen." In USCOP "Technical Review", Vol 8., 1970.
Kutchinksy, Berl. "Pornography and Its Effects in Denmark and the United States: A Rejoinder and Beyond." "Comparitive Social Research: An Annual. Vol. 8. Greenwich Conn.:JAI Press, 1985. Stoltenberg, John. _Refusing to be a Man: Essays on Sex and Justice_. Breitenbush Books, Portland, OR. 1989. Stoltenberg speaks to the issues of woman-hating (as a function of training from childhood) and graphy. He is persuasive, succinct, and he succeeds in clearing up a lot of confusion in these areas. Probably the most effective presentation I've seen in a very long time. Biological determinism is laid to waste.
17. Positive Children's Books. -------------------------------
*_From the Mixed up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler_. Strong female protagonist.
L'Engle, Madeleine. _A Wrinkle in Time_ and many, many others. [Science fiction] AWIT is a classic. Meg Murray saves her father and little brother from the clutches of IT. Three other books follow this one, and L'Engle has written a whole slew of other children's books. Characters are wonderfully drawn, and females get strong, well drawn roles.
McKinley, Robin. _The Hero and the Crown_, _The Blue Sword_. [Fantasy] Set in the ancient kingdom of Damar. The proponents of each book are heroic females who take on the foes of the kingdom. The books start out slow and finish fast. _Hero_ is also a Newberry Award winner.
McKinley, Robin. _The Outlaws of Sherwood_. [Mythic fiction] This version of Robin Hood does not romanticize the life of the outlaws. It also gives a much stronger role to Marian. There are all the familiar characters, plus a few other interesting female characters. The Sheriff of Nottingham stays well in the background. Interesting version.
Voigt, Cynthia. _Homecoming_. [Fiction] Three children walk across a good portion of America after being abandoned. The oldest sister is the one that pulls them through.
[continued in part III]
--------------
Please mail in comments, additions, corrections, suggestions, and so on to feminism-request@ncar.ucar.edu.
--Cindy Tittle Moore
"If an aborigine drafted an IQ test, for example, all of Western Civilization would probably flunk."
|
|
 | | From: | Cindy Tittle Moore | | Subject: | soc.feminism References (part 1 of 3) | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:28:43 GMT |
|
|
 | Archive-name: feminism/refs1 Version: 2.3 Last-modified: 15 February 1993
This posting contains useful feminist references for the newsgroup soc.feminism.
Copies of this FAQ may be obtained by anonymous ftp to rtfm.mit.edu under /pub/usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs1. Or, send email to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs1 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs2 send usenet/news.answers/feminism/refs3 in the body of the message, leaving the subject line empty.
Summary of changes: Marked with |'s at beginning of lines.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prologue.
1. Academia and Sciences. 2. Families and Work. 3. Feminism and Psychology. (incl. ualization, socialization, gender roles). 4. Education. 5. Feminist Theory and Overviews. 6. Folklore. 7. Gendered Communication and Language. 8. Gender Differences. [9-16 continued in part II, 17-24 continued in part III]
Prologue. ---------
This post contains commonly cited and/or useful references on various topics that come up in this newsgroup. Because of the nature of these discussions, it is helpful if you are familiar with at least some of the materials listed under the topic. This is NOT a "You Must Read Every Book On This List Before Participating In Soc.feminism" mandate, but be aware that some familiarity with books on a particular topic makes the ensuing discussion less frustrating for our regular readers who have seen many similar discussions before.
********************************************************************** ** In particular, if you have a question along the lines of "What ** ** can you tell me about ?" you would do better to check the ** ** sources listed here first before trying to garner explanations ** ** over the newsgroup. ** **********************************************************************
This list is undergoing continual modification and I welcome additional references for inclusion. In particular, I would like a wide variety of feminist opinion on each topic. I would also like your input on what "must reads" should be included under particular topics. Most of these books focus on feminism in the US; I would love more references to Canadian, British, European, Asian, African and Latin American feminism. If you have any corrections to point out, by all means, let me know if I've misspelled names or misattributed works.
References marked with an asterisk are incomplete entries that I was unable to verify in the on-line catalogue. In most cases, I think these are references to articles in magazines or books. Any help with these would be appreciated.
Disclaimer: The presence of any particular book in here does not necessarily reflect my views. There are often short blurbs contributed by many people along with the references; no guarantee is made as to their accuracy. If you wish to comment on any entry in here, please feel free to do so.
I hope you are inspired to pick up any of these works and start reading!
1. Academia and Sciences. --------------------------
1989 National Survey of Women Engineers, The Cooper Union. Available on request from the Albert Nerken School of Engineering, 51 Astor Place, New York, NY 10003.
*See New Scientist, P. 8, 9/26/92, volume 135 for story on fighting ism in astronomy.
"Survey of Graduate Students", Presidential Committee on Women Students Interests, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1987.
"A Celebration of Women in Science," _Discover_, December 1991. Contains eleven profiles of successful women in a wide range of fields including Donna Cox in computer graphics. This is a great thing for us to read, to get young women and girls to read or to give as a gift to anyone you'd like to know about what women are doing.
"Still a 'Chilly Climate' for Women?" _Science_, pp 1604-1606. June 21, 1991. Discusses the situation for women in physics and astronomy. It includes some pipeline statistics and results of a survey on the kinds of discrimination women perceive and men notice. Summary: blatant discrimination isn't so much a problem as a "pattern of micro-inequalities".
_Notices of the American Mathematical Society_. No. 7, Sept. 1991. A special issue on women in mathematics. A variety of issues are covered.
"Women and Computing", _Communications of the ACM_, ( Nov. 1990 vol. 33, no. 11.).
"Women in Science and Engineering", Sept-Oct 1991 issue of the "American Scientist" (published by the Sigma Xi Scientific Society) (pp. 404-419).
Abramson, Joan. _Discrimination in the Academic Profession_. Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco. 1975.
Aisenberg, Nadya and Mona Harrington. _Women in Academe: Outsiders in the Sacred Grove_. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst. 1988.
Baum, Eleanor, "Recruiting and Graduating Women: The Underrepresented Student", IEEE Communications Magazine, December 1990, 47-50.
Bernstein, D, "Comfort and experience with computing: are they the same for men and women?", SIGCSE, 23(3), 1990.
Bernstein, D, "Understanding spreadsheets: Effects of computer training on mental model acquisition", _Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Conference_, 164-172, 1990.
Betz, Nancy E, "What stops women and minorities from choosing and completing majors in science and engineering", edited transcript of a Science and Public Policy Seminar given on June 15, 1990. Copies can be obtained from the Federation of Behavioral, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 1200 Seventeenth St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. (202) 955-7758, fax no: (202) 955-7608, bitnet address: fed@gwuvm.
Bruer, John T., Jonathan R. Cole, and Harriet Zuckermann. _The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community_. W. W. Norton & Co, New York. 1991, 351 pp. Presents the status of women in science today, as well as the reasons for this standing.
Brush, Stephen G. "Women in Science and Engineering", _American Scientist_ 79, (Sep-Oct).404-419, 1991. This is an ambitious article. In about 12 pages (not including the list of 102 references), Stephen Brush discusses factors relevant to young girls through senior professionals, across a wide range of scientific disciplines.
Butcher, D. and W. Muth. "Predicting performance in an introductory computer science course", _Communications of the ACM_, 27(11), 263- 268, 1985.
Campbell, P. and G. McCabe. "Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major", _Communications of the ACM_, 27(11), 1108- 1113, 1984.
Casserly, Patricia Lund. "Helping Able Young Women Take Math and Science Seriously in School", The College Board, New York. 1979. Reprinted, with revisions, from Colangelo Zaffrann, ed., _New Voices in Counseling the Gifted_. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa. 1979.
Dambrot, F., M. Watkins-Malek, S. Silling, R. Marshall, and J. Garver. "Correlates of differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers", _Journal of Vocational Behavior_, 27, 71-86, 1985.
Dijkstra, E. "On the cruelty of really teaching computer science", _Communications of the ACM_, 32(12), 1397-1414, 1989.
Erkut, Sumru. "Exploring Sex Differences in Expectancy, Attribution, and Academic Achievement", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 9 (1983) 217-231.
Ernest, John. "Mathematics and Sex", _The American Mathematics Monthly_, October 1976, 83:595-615.
Ferry, Georgina and Jane Moore. "True Confessions of Women in Science", _New Scientist_ 95 (July 1, 1982), 27-30.
Fidell, L. S. "Empirical Verification of Sex Discrimination in Hiring Practices in Psychology", in R. K. Unger and F. L. Denmark, eds., _Women: Dependent or Independent Variable_ Psychological Dimensions, New York. 1975.
Franklin, Phyllis, et al. "Sexual and Gender Harassment in the Academy: A Guide for Faculty, Students and Administrators", Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession, The Modern Language Association of America, New York, NY. 1981.
Frenkel, Karen A. "Women and Computing", _Communications of the ACM_, November 1990, 34-46.
Gerver, E. "Computers and Gender". In Forester, Tom, ed. _Computers in the Human Context_. pp481-501. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989.
Gilbert, Lucia A., June M. Gallessich, and Sherri L. Evans. "Sex of Faculty Role Model and Students' Self-Perceptions of Competency", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 9 (1983) 597-607.
Gornick, Vivian. _Women in Science: 100 Journeys into the Territory_, Touchstone, Simon & Schuster, New York. 1990. Grinstein, Louise S. and Paul J. Campbell, eds. _Women in Mathematics. A Bibliographic Sourcebook_. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut. 1987. Describes ~50 women who were prominent in mathematics. Computer science is considered part of math since Grace Hopper and Ada Lovelace are included. The editors wanted to give a historical perspective of women's role in mathematics so they have only considered women born before 1930.
Gries, David, and Dorothy Marsh. "The 1989-90 Taulbee Survey", _Communications of the ACM_, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1992. A survey of professors across the nation. Statistics. In particular, addresses what the survey tells us about women in academia.
Gries, David and Dorothy Marsh. "CS Produced 734 Ph.D.s in 1989-90; CE Adds 173 for a Total of 907", _Computing Research News_, January 1991, 6-10.
Gross, Jane. "Female Surgeon's Quitting Touches Nerves at Medical School", The New York Times, July 14, 1991, page 10.
Hacker, Sally L. _Doing it the hard way_. Unwin Jyman, Boston. 1990.
Hacker, Sally L. _Pleasure, power and technology_. Unwin Hyman, Boston. 1989.
Hacker, Sally L., "Mathematization of Engineering: Limits on Women and the Field", in Joan Rothschild, ed., _Machina ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology_. Pergamon Press, New York. 1983. pages 38- 58.
Hess, Robert D. and Irene T. Miura. "Gender Differences in Enrollment in Computer Camps and Classes", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 13 (1985) 193-203.
Hill, T., N. Smith, and M. Mann. "Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers", _Journal of Applied Psychology_, 72, 307-313, 1987.
Holland, Dorothy C. and Margaret A. Eisenhart. _Educated in Romance: Woman, Achievement, and College Culture_. The University of Chicago Press. 1990.
Homans, Hilary. "Man-made Myths: The Reality of Being a Woman Scientist in the NHS", in Spencer, Anne and David Podmore, eds, _In a Man's World: Essays on Women in Male dominated Professions_. Tavistock Publications, London and New York. 1987.
Jacobus, Mary, Evelyn Fox Keller, and Sally Shuttleworth, eds. _Body Politics: Women And The Discourses Of Science_. Routledge, NY, 1990.
Kass-Simon, G. and P. Farnes, eds. _Women of Science. Righting the Record_. Indiana University Press. 1990. Reviewed in the March issue of IEEE Spectrum. A collection of 10 articles about women who have made important contributions to science and technology. Unclear that a computer scientist is included. Women mentioned in the review are Bertha Lamme, Edith Clarke, Jenny Rosenthal, Mildred Dresselhaus, Lillian Gilbreth, Marie Curie and Irene Curie. An encouraging aspect of these women's lives is that many of them were married and had families. Also includes a discussion of the differences in how men's and women's work are remembered.
Keith, Sandra Z. and Philip Keith, eds. _Proceedings of the National Conference on Women in Mathematics and the Sciences_. St. Cloud, MN: St. Cloud University, 1990. Keller, Evelyn Fox. _Reflections on Gender and Science_. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1985. Examines how images of and gender have influenced the philosophy of knowledge and the progress of science, going back to Plato's "Symposium".
Kelly, Alison, "Why Girls Don't Do Science", _New Scientist_, May 20, 1982. On women's lack of participation on science. "Teachers put extra effort into teaching boys to read to make up for any deficiency, whether its origin is biological or social. The same could be done to boost the spatial ability of girls if the problems were considered equally serious." (pg 497).
Kelly, Alison, ed. _Science for Girls?_. Open University Press, London and Philadelphia. 1987. ISBN 0-355-10294-8.
Kerr, Barbara A., Ph.D. _Smart Girls, Gifted Women_. Ohio Psychology Press. ISBN 0-910707-07-3 (paperback, $13.95). Why is it that so many gifted & talented girls STILL aren't realizing their ful l potential, despite the Women's Movement? More to the point, what exactly is it that a gifted girl needs but society or individual circumstances may fail to provide? The answers may surprise you. (I'm not just saying that to be arch; I really WAS surprised at some of them.)
Kiesler, Sara, Lee Sproull, and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. "Pool Halls, Chips, and War Games: Women in the Culture of Computing", _Psychology of Women Quarterly_, 9 (1985) 451-462.
Koblitz, Neal, "Are Student Ratings Unfair to Women?", _Newsletter of the Association for Women in Mathematics_, September-October 1990.
Kramer, Pamela E. and Sheila Lehman. "Mismeasuring Women: A Critique of Research on Computer Ability and Avoidance", _Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society_ 16 (1990) 158-172.
*Leveson, Nancy, "Women in Computer Science: A Report of the NSF CISE Cross-Disciplinary Activities Advisory Committee"
Lockheed, Marlaine E. "Women, Girls, and Computers: A First Look at the Evidence", _Sex Roles: A Journal of Research_, 13 (1985) 115-122.
Martin, Dianne, ed. "In Search of Gender-Free Paradigms for Computer Science", NECC, Eugene, OR., 1991.
Ogozalek, Virginia Z. "A Comparison of Male and Female Computer Science Students' Attitudes Toward Computers", SIGCSE Bulletin, June 1989, volume 21, number 2, 8-14.
Pearl, Amy, Martha E. Pollack, Eve Riskin, Becky Thomas, Elizabeth Wolf, and Alice Wu. "Becoming a Computer Scientist", _Communications of the ACM_, November 1990, 47-57.
*Perry, Ruth and Lisa Greber. "Women and Computers: An Introduction"
Pryor, Sally. "Thinking of Oneself as a Computer", _Leonardo_, Vol. 24, Issue 5 (1991). A very interesting and provocative article about the basic conflict between our gender-identity as women and our professional identity as computer professionals.
Rossner, S. _Teaching science and health from a feminist perspective: A practical guide_, Elmsfor, N.Y.: Pergamon Press, 1986.
Rothschild, Joan. _Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology_. Pergamon Press. 1983.
Rothschild, Joan. _Teaching Technology From a Feminist Perspective: A Practical Guide_. Pergamon Press, New York. 1988.
Sanders, Jo Shuchat and Antonia Stone (for the Women's Action Alliance). _The Neuter Computer_. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York. 1986. ISBN. 1-555-70006-3 (paper).
Spertus, Ellen. _Why Are There So Few Female Computer Scientists?_, (1991). An in-depth examination of the many reasons there is a dearth of women in computer science. Available via ftp from ftp.ai.mit.edu under pub/users/ellens/womcs*.ps in postscript format. For information on receiving the bound version of the report (which is $8 + shipping costs), contact publications@ai.mit.edu with your mailing address (to compute shipping costs) and a request for AI TR 1315. A very useful, annotated bibliography as well.
Tidwell, Jenifer, "Hackers in the Garden: A Case Study of Women in Computer Engineering", unpublished, 1990.
Tijdens, K., M. Jennings, I. Wagner, & M. Weggelaar, "Women, Work, and Computerization: Forming New Alliances", Amsterdam: North- Holland, 1989.
Tobias, Sheila. "They're Not Dumb, They're Different. Stalking the Second Tier." Can be purchased from Science News Books, 1719 N St., NW, Washington, DC 20036. The first copy is $2 and additional copies are $.50 each.
Turkle, Sherry and Seymour Papert, "Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16 (1990), 128-157.
Turkle, Sherry, "The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit", New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984.
Van Nostrand, Catharine Herr, "Gender-Responsible Leadership: Do Your Teaching Methods Empower Women?", pages 186-191 Sage Publications, Inc., in Spring 1991. Direct inquiries, with a SASE, to the author at: 36854 Winnebago Road, St. Cloud, MN 56303.
Widnall, Sheila E. "AAAS Presidential Lecture: Voices from the Pipeline", _Science_ 241 (September 30, 1988), 1740-1745.
*Widnall, Sheila, "Voices from the Pipeline"
Wilson, Meg, ed. _OPTIONS for Girls. A Door to the Future_. Foundation for Women's Resources. The Anthology has been developed over the past 6 years. The best 1000 articles, books and studies [from an earlier project] were reviewed and pared down to a readable set of articles that described the problem of why girls don't take more science and math AND that describe strategies to overcome this problem. Between citations within articles and the supplemental reading list the anthology also presents a substantial bibliography. The target audience includes parents, teachers, school board members, community leaders and girls themselves. The anthology is $22 (includes shipping and handling, no tax assessed). Write to: Pro-Ed, 8700 Shoal Creek Blvd, Austin, TX 78758, attn. Linda Brown. Discounts available for large orders.
Wolpert, Lewis and Alison Richards. _A Passion for Science_. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1988.
Zappert, Laraine T. and Kendyll Stansbury, "A Comparative Analysis of Men and Women in Graduate Programs in Science, Engineering and Medicine at Stanford University", Working Papers, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford University, 1985. Single copies are available at no cost from the Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford, University (415-723-1994).
2. Families and Work. ----------------------
Alcott, Louisa May. _Working_. Schocken Books. 1977. ISBN 0-8052-0563-2.
Beneria, Lourdes and Catharine R. Stimpson, eds. _Women, Households and the Economy_. Series: The Douglass series on Women's Lives and the Meaning of Gender. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 1987. Collection describing interrelationship between family and work, patriarchy and capitalism. Also often used as a text.
Campbell, Bebe Moore. _Successful Women, Angry Men: backlash in the two-career marriage_ Random House, 1986. ISBN: 0-394-55149-4. It's less academic than _The Second Shift_, but gains a sense of immediacy Hochschild lacks. _SW, AM_ discusses how the realities of marriage have changed (mostly talking about the upper middle class) and how the expectations and social and technical education of both genders has failed to keep up.
Cockburn, Cynthia. _Machinery of Dominance. Women, Men, and Technical Know-How_. Pluto Press, London and Dover, NH. 1985. Northeastern University Press, Bostion. 1988. A discussion of job segregation in the workplace and its relationship to gendered assumptions, patriarchy, and technology.
Fassel, Diane. _Working Ourselves to Death: The High Cost of Workaholism, the Rewards of Recovery_. Harper, San Francisco. 1990. Dedication: "This book is for all those who struggle with the insidious killer disease called workaholism. It is for those who know that facing the reality of work addiction is to meet the wrath of society. It is for all who long for life-giving workplaces and a saner society." Sample chapters. -- Workaholism. Reality & Myths -- Women & Workaholism -- The Workaholic Organization -- Why Are We Doing This to Ourselves?
Hertz, Rosanna. _More Equal Than Others: Women and Men in Dual-Career Marriages_. University of California Press. 1986. 0-520-05804-6. Blurb: "...offers a provocative glimpse of changing marital styles among young corporate couples. Frofessor Hertz describes with perception and wit the negotiations and ad hoc accommodations entailed as dual-career families succumb to the seduction of success. This book will surely give pause to those who believe that ideological commitments to gender equality will stimulate or sustain marriage and childrearing patterns in the post-feminist era. Rather, one detects the awesome power of corporations to shape the private lives of even the most privileged employees." Hochschild, Arlie and Anne Machung. _The Second Shift_. Viking Press. 1989. A well-reasearched look at the two-pay-check marriage, sheds a great deal of light on why so many men are still unwilling to share the housework and childcare.
|Jeffreys, S., ed. _The Sexuality Debate_. | A collection of the major articles that fueled the feminist | campaigns and helped bringh about significant reforms in the area | of secual abuse of women and domestic violence. [British]
Lang, Susan S. _Women without Children: The Reasons, the Rewards, the Regrets_. Pharos Books. 1991. ISBN 0-89687-532-3. Lang examines the issue of childlessness through a series of interviews as well as citations from the social science literature. She presents various reasons women don't have children, then cites the statistics on the financial and personal strains on a couple having children, the disproportionate amount of work women do for their kids, the freedom childfree living can bring, the fact that a majority of mothers are ambivalent about motherhood. She tries to debunk stereotypes of childless women as selfish, lonlier in their old age, less well off financially, etc. While many of the older women she interviewed said they went through a difficult period when they realized they would remain childless, they all seemed to adapt well and go on to find other sources of satisfaction in their lives.
Milwid, Beth. _What You Get When You Go For It_. Dodd, Mead, New York. 1987. W |
|
|