newsgroups-index (beta)

Current group: sci.techniques.microscopy

Photomicrography website

Photomicrography website  
Dr. Georg N.Nyman
 Re: Photomicrography website  
GTO
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Dr. Georg N.Nyman
 Re: Photomicrography website - 2nd part  
Dr. Georg N.Nyman
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Al
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Dr. Georg N.Nyman
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Al
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Repeating Rifle
 Re: Photomicrography website  
Dr. Georg N.Nyman
From:Dr. Georg N.Nyman
Subject:Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:26:19 -0700
Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
to my redesigned photomicrography website:

http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm

Thanks for looking!
George
From:GTO
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:01:30 GMT
George:

You have some very good photographs on your webpage. May I ask what kind of
cameras you are using? Especially, of course, what kind of cameras do you
use for making your excellent photomicrographs?

Thanks,

Gregor


"Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote in message
news:C-ydnbOPqIsueXrcRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
> to my redesigned photomicrography website:
>
> http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>
> Thanks for looking!
> George
From:Dr. Georg N.Nyman
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:51:07 -0700
Gregor, all photomicrographs have been made with the built-in camera
system of the Reichert Polyvar, Polyvar Met and MeF3. Unfortunately, all
these instruments have been discontinued quite some time ago.
Regards George


GTO wrote:
> George:
>
> You have some very good photographs on your webpage. May I ask what kind of
> cameras you are using? Especially, of course, what kind of cameras do you
> use for making your excellent photomicrographs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gregor
>
>
> "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote in message
> news:C-ydnbOPqIsueXrcRVn-gA@comcast.com...
>
>>Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
>>to my redesigned photomicrography website:
>>
>>http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>>
>>Thanks for looking!
>>George
>
>
>
From:Dr. Georg N.Nyman
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website - 2nd part
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:52:46 -0700
Gregor, I forgot to answer your first question - I am using a Linhof
Master Technika 4x5inch, a Mamiya RZ67ProII and an ALPA12SWA for my
photography - regards George


GTO wrote:
> George:
>
> You have some very good photographs on your webpage. May I ask what kind of
> cameras you are using? Especially, of course, what kind of cameras do you
> use for making your excellent photomicrographs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gregor
>
>
> "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote in message
> news:C-ydnbOPqIsueXrcRVn-gA@comcast.com...
>
>>Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
>>to my redesigned photomicrography website:
>>
>>http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>>
>>Thanks for looking!
>>George
>
>
>
From:Al
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:40:19 GMT
In article ,
"Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote:

> http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm

Very nice. What is the ratio of bad to good results?

Al
From:Dr. Georg N.Nyman
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:55:40 -0700
Al wrote:
> In article ,
> "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>
>
> Very nice. What is the ratio of bad to good results?
>
> Al
Well Al, I am doing this since 1979, so my ratio of good vs bad is quite
fine (75%good). It all depends not only on excellent equipment and in
depth knowledge of optical microscopy, but also on a relatively large
amount of hands-on experience with preparation techniques. Believe me, I
was wasting tons of film, when I started...
From:Al
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:47:11 GMT
In article <1aOdnQREP6FLvnXcRVn-sw@comcast.com>,
"Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote:

> Al wrote:
> > In article ,
> > "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
> >
> >
> > Very nice. What is the ratio of bad to good results?
> >
> > Al
> Well Al, I am doing this since 1979, so my ratio of good vs bad is quite
> fine (75%good). It all depends not only on excellent equipment and in
> depth knowledge of optical microscopy, but also on a relatively large
> amount of hands-on experience with preparation techniques. Believe me, I
> was wasting tons of film, when I started...

I've been doing scientific photography as a electronic components
failure analyst since 1969. And boy, did I waste the film. Most of it
was Poloroid film. Using the correct filters, light sources, exposure
times and film was a constant struggle. At a buck or more per shot, it
got quite expensive. I'd say I tossed at least half of my shots. Many
times the first shot was the trial shot and the subsequent adjustment
improved it considerably.

Did you ever paint with light?

Al
From:Repeating Rifle
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:50:22 GMT
in article C-ydnbOPqIsueXrcRVn-gA@comcast.com, Dr. Georg N.Nyman at
gnnyman@swissonline.ch wrote on 1/14/05 7:26 AM:

> Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
> to my redesigned photomicrography website:
>
> http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>
> Thanks for looking!
> George

Thank you!

What would be interesting would be to understand any scientific significance
contained within your great photos.
From:Dr. Georg N.Nyman
Subject:Re: Photomicrography website
Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:01:53 -0700
Repeating Rifle wrote:
> in article C-ydnbOPqIsueXrcRVn-gA@comcast.com, Dr. Georg N.Nyman at
> gnnyman@swissonline.ch wrote on 1/14/05 7:26 AM:
>
>
>>Hello to everyone, in case you are interested, I would like to point you
>>to my redesigned photomicrography website:
>>
>>http://www.gnyman.com/Photomicrography.htm
>>
>>Thanks for looking!
>>George
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> What would be interesting would be to understand any scientific significance
> contained within your great photos.
>
The scientific significance - good question. Some of the photographs are
scientifically interesting like the cat brain with the cryptococcus or
the surface defects on the Si wafer but most objects which I photograph
are just nice, nothing more. I like photography very much and do a lot
but unfortunately, I have no Polyvar microscope anymore. That
microscope, made in Austria, in Vienna by C.Reichert AG, at its time
(1978-1994) was the best equipment you could buy for money if you were a
photomicrography enthusiast.
Reichert's research microscopes have been eliminated by Leica
Microsystems soon after they bought Reichert - too much competition for
Wetzlar....maybe some people don't like that comment, but I know what I
am talking about.
   

Copyright © 2006 newsgroups-index   -   All rights reserved   -   Impressum