|
|
 | | From: | AJ Bowling | | Subject: | PATAg question | | Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:32:01 -0500 |
|
|
 | does anyone know if there is a difference between the results obtained
with thiocarbohydrazide (tch) vs. thiosemicarbazide (tsc)? i have
several references on the subject. some use tch and some use tsc but
none of them explain why they chose one over the other. it seems that
(perhaps) tch is better for sections, while the tsc may be more useful
for carbohydrates in suspension...?
andy bowling
grad student (botany)
the university of texas
|
|
|
