NO!! AND THEY NEVER WILL. Darwinian evolution THEORY is about sister-fuckers
and mother-fuckers and that's the truth to it. They justify their depravity
by an equally depraved THEORY.

AND NO, I'M NOT A FUCKING CREATIONIST, YOU DUMB, SLIMY CUNTS!!!!

"Gaetan Mailloux" wrote in message
news:cr5gqa$9t3$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
>
> Hi
>
> About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
>
> Thank
>
> Gaetan
> --
>

From:	Huge
Subject:	Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
Date:	1 Jan 2005 17:40:31 GMT

"Dorian West" writes:

>
>
>>
>> --
>> Gaetan
>>
>> Thank
>>
>> About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
>>
>> Hi
>>
>news:cr5gqa$9t3$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
>"Gaetan Mailloux" wrote in message
>
>AND NO, I'M NOT A FUCKING CREATIONIST, YOU DUMB, SLIMY CUNTS!!!!
>
>by an equally depraved THEORY.
>and mother-fuckers and that's the truth to it. They justify their depravity
>NO!! AND THEY NEVER WILL. Darwinian evolution THEORY is about sister-fuckers

Merely a foul-mouthed top-posting moron.

And to answer the OP's question; No. There is no such thing. We have a
common ancestor, not a "missing link".

--
"The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]

From:	Dorian West
Subject:	Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
Date:	Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:33:09 -0000

"Huge" wrote in message
news:cr6naf$f66$3@anubis.demon.co.uk...
> "Dorian West" writes:
>>> Gaetan
>>>
>>> Thank
>>>
>>> About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>news:cr5gqa$9t3$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
>>"Gaetan Mailloux" wrote in message
>>
>>AND NO, I'M NOT A FUCKING CREATIONIST, YOU DUMB, SLIMY CUNTS!!!!
>>
>>by an equally depraved THEORY.
>>and mother-fuckers and that's the truth to it. They justify their
>>depravity
>>NO!! AND THEY NEVER WILL. Darwinian evolution THEORY is about
>>sister-fuckers
>
>
> Merely a foul-mouthed top-posting moron.
>
> And to answer the OP's question; No. There is no such thing. We have a
> common ancestor, not a "missing link".

We have no common ancestor with anything other than a human. If you choose
to have a common ancestor with a rodent or reptile, that's up to you.

From:	Huge
Subject:	Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
Date:	2 Jan 2005 12:14:14 GMT

"Dorian West" writes:
>
>"Huge" wrote in message
>news:cr6naf$f66$3@anubis.demon.co.uk...
>> "Dorian West" writes:
>>>> Gaetan
>>>>
>>>> Thank
>>>>
>>>> About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>news:cr5gqa$9t3$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
>>>"Gaetan Mailloux" wrote in message
>>>
>>>AND NO, I'M NOT A FUCKING CREATIONIST, YOU DUMB, SLIMY CUNTS!!!!
>>>
>>>by an equally depraved THEORY.
>>>and mother-fuckers and that's the truth to it. They justify their
>>>depravity
>>>NO!! AND THEY NEVER WILL. Darwinian evolution THEORY is about
>>>sister-fuckers
>>
>>
>> Merely a foul-mouthed top-posting moron.
>>
>> And to answer the OP's question; No. There is no such thing. We have a
>> common ancestor, not a "missing link".
>
>We have no common ancestor with anything other than a human. If you choose
>to have a common ancestor with a rodent or reptile, that's up to you.

If you choose to be a moron, that's up to you. Until the moment you try
and impose your broken world-view on anyone else, that is.

--
"The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]

From:	Joachim Verhagen
Subject:	Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
Date:	Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:22:37 +0100

On 1 Jan 2005 06:43:22 GMT, ba221@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Gaetan Mailloux)
wrote:

>
>Hi
>
>About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
>

There is a problem in looking for a missing link. Someone digs up some new
species, it is studied and it is declared to be a human. So the missing link
is before that. Another species is found and studied and declared to be an
ape but probably an ancestor or closely related to an ancestor of humans. So
the missing link must be after that. Therefore you get an ape or a human,
but never the missing link.

Joachim.

--
This post is free post; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

Joachim Verhagen (jcdverha@xs4all.nl)
WWW http://www.xs4all.nl/~jcdverha/ (Science Jokes)

From:	deowll
Subject:	Re: Do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
Date:	Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:19:12 -0600

"Joachim Verhagen" wrote in message
news:m2fft09rr7rreuj54c2h3h5l80d8els3mg@4ax.com...
> On 1 Jan 2005 06:43:22 GMT, ba221@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Gaetan Mailloux)
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Hi
>>
>>About men evolution, do they found the missing link between apes and man ?
>>
>
> There is a problem in looking for a missing link. Someone digs up some
> new
> species, it is studied and it is declared to be a human. So the missing
> link
> is before that. Another species is found and studied and declared to be
> an
> ape but probably an ancestor or closely related to an ancestor of humans.
> So
> the missing link must be after that. Therefore you get an ape or a human,
> but never the missing link.
>
> Joachim.
>
>
Yes but if you look at a couple of different creationist authors you will
find a point is reached at which some authors say something is an ape while
other authors says it is a human. If they can't agree then they have already
found what they say doesn't exist.

> --
> This post is free post; you can redistribute it and/or
> modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>
> Joachim Verhagen (jcdverha@xs4all.nl)
> WWW http://www.xs4all.nl/~jcdverha/ (Science Jokes)