 | | From: | Martin Trump | | Subject: | Re: 4 liars affecting our lives | | Date: | Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:33:56 +0000 |
|
|
 | In message <8512db5b.0411200602.1c8b9ce0@posting.google.com>, Dan
Shanefield writes
>Supported by a short list of well-informed "Customer Reviews" of books
>in amazon.com, my site
While some of what you say may well be true, I'm surprised that you rely
so heavily on Amazon book reviews to further your argument. Anybody can
write anything there. I would regard those as just about the most
unreliable sources imaginable. Why not use peer reviewed publications?
Regards.
--
Martin Trump
|
|
| | From: | Dan Shanefield | | Subject: | Re: 4 liars affecting our lives | | Date: | 21 Nov 2004 05:41:12 -0800 |
|
|
| I'm really referring to the books. But the cust. revu is VERY
accessible via the web, so just using that as a summary, not as an
authority (altho some have good credentials). I'm hoping you'll read
the books.
Dan S.
|
|
| | From: | Dan Shanefield | | Subject: | Re: 4 liars affecting our lives | | Date: | 21 Nov 2004 05:59:33 -0800 |
|
|
| I certainly have to agree with you. But pls. read the books! I'm
just using this for VERY easy access to the ideas, via the web and
amazon cust. revu., not as the authority at all (which of course I am
not). Just calling attention to the books and SUMMARY (in the
customer revu) of their ideas.
Dan S.
|
|
