 | | From: | BretCahill | | Subject: | Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | 24 Dec 2004 14:55:52 GMT |
|
|
 | The thermal conductivity of pure metals decreases dramatically with temperature. The exact opposite happens in alloys.
This is why so many people hate materials science.
Bret Cahill
|
|
 | | From: | Uncle Al | | Subject: | Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:09:24 -0800 |
|
|
 | BretCahill wrote: > > The thermal conductivity of pure metals decreases dramatically with > temperature. > The exact opposite happens in alloys. > > This is why so many people hate materials science.
You've got some real problems there, boy, including profound ignorance. Give a scientist or an engineer a legitimate trend and you get solutions not problems.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
|
|
 | | From: | jbuch | | Subject: | Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:12:52 -0600 |
|
|
 | BretCahill wrote: > The thermal conductivity of pure metals decreases dramatically with > temperature. > The exact opposite happens in alloys. > > This is why so many people hate materials science. > > > Bret Cahill >
No, general stupidity about the solid state of matter is the general rule. For engineers.
Tthere is little value in attempting to understand what stupid people hate, and why they hate it..
Well, a study of engineering pathological personalities may gain value from such inquiries.
Your overly generalized statement isn't true anyway. Again, typical of those who lack understanding of the solid state of matter.
There are conditins where the thermal conductivity of pure metals varies as the cube of the absolute temperature, meaning thermal conductivity rises rapidly with temperature for many pure metals, under the right conditions.
|
|
 | | From: | Mark Thorson | | Subject: | Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2004 23:06:05 GMT |
|
|
 | jbuch wrote:
> There is little value in attempting to understand what stupid > people hate, and why they hate it..
Stick to research, you have NO aptitude for marketing. :-)
|
|
 | | From: | BretCahill | | Subject: | Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | 25 Dec 2004 16:12:58 GMT |
|
|
 | Mark Thorson nospam@sonic.net in >Message-id: <41CCA17B.D9FCB830@sonic.net> writes: > >jbuch wrote: > >> There is little value in attempting to understand what stupid >> people hate, and why they hate it.. > >Stick to research, you have NO aptitude for marketing. :-)
Someone needs to start working on a more user friendly version of Nature.
Bret Cahill
|
|
 | | From: | jbuch | | Subject: | Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals | | Date: | Sat, 25 Dec 2004 13:06:48 -0600 |
|
|
 | BretCahill wrote: > Mark Thorson nospam@sonic.net in > >>Message-id: <41CCA17B.D9FCB830@sonic.net> writes: >> >>jbuch wrote: >> >> >>>There is little value in attempting to understand what stupid >>>people hate, and why they hate it.. >> >>Stick to research, you have NO aptitude for marketing. :-) > > > Someone needs to start working on a more > user friendly version of Nature. > > > Bret Cahill > > > You could certainly begin with yourself as a model for user friendliness ..... See below
> The thermal conductivity of pure metals decreases dramatically with > temperature. > The exact opposite happens in alloys. > > This is why so many people hate materials science. > > > Bret Cahill
|
|