|
|
 | | From: | jay_stutz at yahoo.com | | Subject: | Re: The Power-of-One | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 07:00:19 -0800 |
|
|
 | Insightful comments on the state of the union, or disunion.
Jay
crosstar wrote:
> THE POWER-OF-ONE
>
> Richard Barrett: Let me make an apology for George W. Bush. He has
> invaded a sovereign nation, unprovoked, and the Liar-in-Chief today
is
> having his coronation. I apologize to the people of Iraq and
Afghanistan
> for that kind of atrocity. The Bush Administration has instituted
the same
> kind of atrocities against Mississippi and America. What we have is
a
> tragedy taking place today. We have the installation of a man who
has
> violated the Bill of Rights. He has abused the judicial system. But
it is
> appropriate to inaugurate, today, instead, the "Power-of- One."
Martin Luther
> was tried by the Diet of Worms, but one vote kept him from being
executed.
> Andrew Johnson was impeached and one vote kept him from being removed
> from office. One voice, today is just as powerful as that of George
W=2E Bush.
>
> Rip Daniels: There is a lot that can be appreciated about Mr.
Barrett.
> Especially the fact that it takes people like him to try the limits
and interpretation
> of the Constitution. He makes sure that we are honest.
>
> Barrett: I support the Constitution, which is why I am rebuking
George W.
> Bush about this so-called election, this puppet election, in Iraq.
I'm telling
> the people of Iraq -- and they are going to do it -- to boycott this
election.
> And I say the same thing about Bush's puppet-juries here in this
country. I
> simply call upon every honest American to refuse to serve this man,
in any
> way. Turn your back on him. We have a long tradition of defying the
King
> of England, that was King George III. Let us do the same with King
George
> II, to defy that same kind of tyranny, here, in our own day.
>
> The reason this nation -- and, in fact, the world -- is in turmoil is
because
> George W. Bush is not taking an oath to support and defend the United
> States of America. He believes in the "Diverse" States of America.
Which
> means that he is playing to the minority bloc. And this is
interesting. When
> I was interviewed on Channel 16, recently, I said, "He's pandering to
the
> colored bloc vote." And, when she read it on the news, she said that
> "Richard Barrett says that he's pandering to his constituents." Well,
I got
> ahold of her and I said, "I want you to say what I said." She said,
"We
> don't mention the word 'colored' on our station." I said, "How about
saying
> 'minority?'" So, on the next report, they used the word "minority."
Again, I
> used the "power-of-one."
>
> Daniels: You are a jurist, an attorney. You believe in seeking
justice, do
> you not?
>
> Barrett: Yes, absolutely, which is why I repeat that, in a
democracy, the
> majority has to rule. For example, the Confederate flag was voted in
by
> sixty-six percent of the vote here. But, under the "Bush Doctrine,"
it would be
> said that "the NAACP has to work its will, because they are
offended," so
> erase the vote of the people. I am saying, "No," right now. Notice
the words
> that Mr. Bush is using on the Inauguration Day. He talks about the
"liberation"
> of Iraq, when it's nothing but attempting to enslave the people of
Iraq. And,
> then, you have him talking about "civil rights," when he sets up
kangaroo
> courts and "legal" lynchings, of those who oppose him.
>
> I volunteered to go to Iraq, to help the Resistance. But Al Basrah
told me
> not to come. They said, "We don't need people from the outside.
Just
> spread the word to honest people in America that we are
freedom-fighters.
> And, we simply want our liberty and our sovereignty." Remember when
that
> Marine shot that fellow in the mosque, in the head, he shot me, as
well,
> together with every honest American. Just as when they put the
handcuffs
> on Sixties' anti-Communists, they put the handcuffs on every real
American.
> So, I am not going to rest, until, instead of using this
reverse-usage of
> language, when we say "freedom," we'll mean freedom. And, when we
say
> "liberation," we'll mean liberation. We must liberate ourselves from
the
> despotism of George W. Bush, so that we have liberty and justice, in
this
> country and throughout this world.
>
> Daniels: So, you are looking at the occupation of Iraq as similar to
the federal
> occupation of Mississippi, after the Civil War.
>
> Barrett: No, I am talking about the tyranny of George W. Bush. I
was interviewed
> the other day by a Norwegian newspaper and they said to me, "Do you
want
> to go back to the days prior to the Civil War?" I said, "The ones
who want to
> go back are the Kenneth Stokes and that sort who want to go back to
the
> Reconstruction, when black-power and Carpetbaggers ruled
Mississippi."
> Well, we're not going to go back to that. I saw this little sticker
on a car at
> Walmart yesterday. It had an American flag and it said, "These
colors don't
> run." And, I thought, "That's very patriotic," but there is also, in
Mississippi,
> the woodshed. Where you take the kid who's been bad and you go out
back,
> teach him a lesson and spank him, so he's not supposed to do the same
> thing, again, when he's done wrong.
>
> Well, when Mr. Bush does wrong, we need to spank him, over Iraq and
all of
> his other abuses. My fear today is of tyranny. As I mentioned,
George W.
> Bush is loyal, today, to what he would term a "Diverse" States of
America,
> which could very lead to the "United States of Mexico" in a few
years, if the
> immigration continues, or to the "United States of Africa," as Imare
Obedale
> wanted. James K. Vardaman, the Senator from Mississippi, who voted
against
> World War I, said that "I'm not against this war because of what it's
going to
> do, over there, but what it is going to do, to cost us our freedoms,
here at home."
>
> So, what is happening now? I correspond with a prisoner named
Jessiha
> Lancaster in Washington State. He tried to get our newspaper, "All
The
> Way", which we publish and which is against Bush. They put him in
> isolation, they refused to give him the paper, they accused him of
being
> a "terrorist." But, he finally won that case, so now he can read his
newspaper.
> But, do you see what is happening here? Tyranny abroad is causing
tyranny
> at home. So, I appeal to every righteous, honest, patriotic
American, to
> stand against it. Let us have a rebirth of freedom in our country.
I am a
> Nationalist. Which means that I do not want the South to be
separate. I
> want us to be one nation. Just red, white and blue power of one,
united nation.
>
> Tomorrow, the twenty-first of January, is the Eighteenth Anniversary
of the
> uprising in Forsyth County, Georgia, where myself and six-thousand
other
> people marched to oppose Hosea Williams, who tried to integrate that
county.
> Sixty-six of us were arrested, that day, for freedom of speech. All
of them were
> acquitted. And, eighteen years later, that county remains segregated
and free.
> So, that was a great day in history, the twenty-first day of January.
Again,
> the "power-of-one."
>
> Daniels: You do have a commitment to not having a tyrannical
government,
> state, federal or otherwise.
>
> Barrett: That is correct. And, I am going a step even further. I
am calling for
> the boycotting of this so-called election coming up, but, if there
are any
> military people listening to me, who would like to oppose the tyranny
of
> George W. Bush, I hope that they will contact me, at Nationalist.org,
and I will
> help them. Al Basrah has told me that they will give safe-conduct in
Iraq to
> any military-personnel who want to desert, for patriotic reasons.
Now, I am a
> veteran. I, certainly, am not a coward and I'm not a pacifist, but,
if they want
> to protest the tyranny of Bush, I will help them. And, indeed, if
anyone would
> like to speak out and join in bringing about a day when the majority,
not the
> minority, will rule, contact me. We have to get the superstructure
in place for
> when Bush is deposed. His war is lost in Iraq, we need to plan for
tomorrow.
>
> Darrell: What is your definition of Communism?
>
> Barrett: It is "one-worldism." There would be no races, no
nationalities, no
> borders. Just one, big blob of humanity. And, of course, the
opposite of that is
> Nationalism, where you have people with certain languages, certain
religions,
> certain customs and heritage. And, they put a border around
themselves and
> they carry their freedom on. That is the difference between Communism
and
> human freedom.
>
> Darrell: In my opinion, democratic government is Communist, because
it treats
> everyone the same and wants everybody to have the same thing.
>
> Barrett: But, you see, we are speaking the same language. That's
not
> Communist. That means we are held together by one language, one set
of
> morals, one set of laws. And these "Diversicrats," if you will, that
want to cater
> to minorities, cater to Spanish-speaking people, basically they are
dividing the
> country. And, I am not going to allow that to happen. The
"power-of-one."
> I hope that no upright American will allow that to happen, either.
>
> Darrell: I agree with you one-hundred percent.
>
> Barrett: Thank you. You see, today, in the "coronation" in
Washington, you've
> gotm these people in Washington that, if you're poor or a
working-man, they
> have no use for you. But, if you are a Halliburton-type or a
stock-broker,
> then, they want you. Just look at the Cabinet. There is Condo Rice,
a Negress.
> You've got Alfredo Gonzales, a Mexican. Then there's Michael
Chertoff, a
> Jew. Why can't we have a government that looks like America? We
haven't
> had a thousand-years of Anglo-Saxon civilization to succumb to the
darkness
> of Africa, the backwardness of Mexico or the barbarity of Israel.
That would
> be the fragmenting of this country. And, I oppose it, as a patriot.
>
> Judy: Aren't these people who pay taxes, just like you do?
>
> Barrett: Well, you notice that John Kerry got forty-eight or
forty-nine percent of
> the vote, but he has no role in the Inauguration. Under our form of
government
> -- and I support it -- under the Constitution, it's winner-take-all.
Now, there are
> some countries, I think Italy and Israel, where, if you get any votes
at all, you get
> some seat in the government. But, those governments are unstable.
We want
> a good, free and stable government.
>
> Darrell: I can see that history is one of your best suites.
>
> Barrett: Thank you. But, now, let's write our own history. I did
not vote for George
> W. Bush. But, I cannot go up and kick him off the platform, as much
as I would
> like. But, I'm working for the next election. That's what you have
to do. I
> supported Larry McCook, the one who wouldn't follow the orders over
in Iraq.
> Now, like Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans. Jackson had
Indians
> and pirates there with him, but I am not gong to invite McCook into
my house
> and I'm not going to sit in the same church with him, any more than
Jackson did
> with the Indians and pirates, but I commend him for standing up
against tyranny.
> And, that's what we need to do, as Americans.
>
> Sam: What are you afraid of? You sound like you are in fear.
>
> Barrett: I am afraid of losing our freedom, our nationality and,
even, our country.
> I just do not want it to be the "United States of Mexico," "United
States of
> Mexico" or anything else. Just listen to the Inauguration today and
you'll hear
> more Communist propaganda than you've ever heard. About occupation
being
> "freedom" and atrocities being "liberation." And, you'll see the
Alcorn Band
> and B. B. King and all this pandering to minorities. But, as Lincoln
said, "You
> can fool the people some of the time, but not all the time." We're
going to come
> out from under this tyranny. Mr. Bush is, simply, not following the
wishes of
> the people of America, and, certainly, not following the wishes of
the people
> here in Mississippi, that you do not violate the Constitution, you
don't tear up
> the Bill of Rights, just to suit the whims and wishes of a minority.
America must
> no more be dictated to by Tel Aviv than by Harlem.
>
> Julia: I want to invite Richard Barrett to my house for dinner and
when he leaves
> he will be hanging from a tree.
>
> Barrett: You notice that the same thing happened last time, when I
was here,
> a man had to be cut off the air, who called in and said that he was
going to come
> to my house and kill me. Here you have a woman saying she is going
to hang
> me. Thank God that there are people who believe, instead, in being
peace-makers.
> I'm a Democrat. I ran for Governor as a Democrat. But. more
importantly, I am
> an American. I remember when the Trent Lott case came up. When Lott
went
> over to the Black Caucus and he said that he was for
affirmative-action and he was
> sorry that he voted against the King Holiday and I rebuked him. And
some people
> said, "You're siding with the Kennedies." I said, "No, we whip our
own, we take
> care of our own, here in Mississippi." And, that's what I'm saying
right now. We
> do not need to have Mr. Chertoff or Mr. Gonzales, over America, any
more than
> we need the Cuban, that Trent Lott put in as a federal judge, over
Mississippi.
>
> The question is, "Who is going to speak for Mississippi and America?"
I am. I hate
> that we are having this terrible oppression, because if there is
oppression anywhere,
> then there is oppression everywhere. The answer is democracy and
majority rule.
> So, don't take rights away, here or abroad. Don't impose tyranny
over nationality,
> here or anywhere. For, as the attempt to destroy the freedom of Iraq
and Afghanistan
> fails, so fails the effort to destroy the freedom of America.
>
> http://www.nationalist.org/docs/ideology/2005/one.html
>
> The Nationalist Movement
> PO Box 2000
> Learned MS 39154
> (601) 885-2288
> Crosstarlist: http://www.nationalist.org/docs/resources/list.html
> E-mail: mailto:crosstar@nationalist.org
> Forum: http://www.nationalist.org/forum/index.php
> Home Page: http://www.nationalist.org
> ICQ: 5429992
> Newsgroup: alt.national
> Views not necessarily those of The Nationalist Movement
> =A9 2005 by The Nationalist Movement
|
|
| | From: | robert j. kolker | | Subject: | Re: The Power-of-One | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:01:37 -0500 |
|
|
|
jay_stutz@yahoo.com wrote:
> Insightful comments on the state of the union, or disunion.
Wait until you see what happens to Iran sometime during the next four years.
Bob Kolker
|
|
|
