 |
|
Current group: sci.archaeology
Re: FLogging a dead horse, was Re: 36 American plants in the Pacific basin
|
|
| | From: | george | | Subject: | Re: FLogging a dead horse, was Re: 36 American plants in the Pacific basin | | Date: | 16 Jan 2005 12:28:16 -0800 |
|
|
 |
Eric Stevens wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:09:36 +0000, Doug Weller
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:40:23 +1300, in sci.archaeology, benlizross
wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>The oookhc-thing appears to be some kind of automated shill for the
> >>ScienceOxygen site. The point of which is not at all clear. Even
> >>flogging a dead horse seems purposeful and almost sensible by
> >>comparison.
> >
> >Some people blame this on Google Beta (ie the fact that people are
> >replying to ancient postings as in this case).
> >This thread ended when? 5 years ago?
>
> Yuri succeeded in briefly reviving it again sometime in 2004. :-(
>
and he'll achieve the same result in 2006, 2007 and so on until he
dies.
So long as any-one uses the same header any brain dead subject can
be revived... :-(
|
|
| | From: | Eric Stevens | | Subject: | Re: FLogging a dead horse, was Re: 36 American plants in the Pacific basin | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:45:39 +1300 |
|
|
| On 16 Jan 2005 12:28:16 -0800, "george" wrote:
>
>Eric Stevens wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:09:36 +0000, Doug Weller
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:40:23 +1300, in sci.archaeology, benlizross
>wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>The oookhc-thing appears to be some kind of automated shill for the
>> >>ScienceOxygen site. The point of which is not at all clear. Even
>> >>flogging a dead horse seems purposeful and almost sensible by
>> >>comparison.
>> >
>> >Some people blame this on Google Beta (ie the fact that people are
>> >replying to ancient postings as in this case).
>> >This thread ended when? 5 years ago?
>>
>> Yuri succeeded in briefly reviving it again sometime in 2004. :-(
>>
>and he'll achieve the same result in 2006, 2007 and so on until he
>dies.
>So long as any-one uses the same header any brain dead subject can
>be revived... :-(
>
Using artificial exasperation, no doubt. :-)
Eric Stevens
|
|
|
| | |
|
 |