newsgroups-index (beta)

Current group: sci.anthropology

Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?

Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?  
bernxard at yahoo.com.au
 Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?  
Dorian West
From:bernxard at yahoo.com.au
Subject:Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?
Date:15 Jan 2005 01:14:36 -0800
American Renaisance did a bid of an expose' on the myth of the Staunch
Family Oriented Mexican.

That cheap labour also has disadvantages beyond the 3-4 times higher
crime rate that mexicans bring. There is the displacement of White
children from part time jobs and the displacement of the small White
underclass from menial work and of course the displacement of the large
Black underclass from gainfull employment. These groups once had a
place or small nicche in society: a place to start from, to have
respect or to at least eek a reasonable life and spirit.

Here is a link: http://www.vdare.com/francis/heather.htm
"Hispanic youths, whether recent arrivals or birthright American
citizens," she reports "are developing an underclass culture....
Hispanic school dropout rates and teen birthrates are now the highest
in the nation. Gang crime is exploding nationally -- rising 50 percent
from 1999 to 2002-driven by the march of Hispanic immigration east
and north across the country. Most worrisome, underclass indicators
like crime and single parenthood do not improve over successive
generations of Hispanics-they worsen."
*******

Then there is the massive subsidisation of the health care system, the
provision of 'affirmitive action' to the the cost of Whites in either
higher expenses or displacement of otherwise adaquet Whites from
education and work. Becuase they are "White"

Consider the parasitc effect of the large 'diversitycrat' career crowd,
the perversion of our politicians by hispandering.

That cheap labour is starting to look expensive.

What good is having the cheapest labour? It doesn't make a great
society even for elites. The blowback is too inevitable to severe.

There are few menial tasks that can't be done better with automation.
There is not a fruit or vegetable that can not be harvested
automatically by machinary. By providing cheap often illegal labour we
displace the deployment of already existing automation that is of no
great complexity. Managers and lawyers become a little lazy, the kinds
of people that would rather hire 100 Mexicans illegally than hire a
skilled contrator or hire an engineer and a few technicians to come up
with a scheme. It encourages laziness. It encourages the development
of low paying low tech nation and industries. The Califorania orange
industry is reeling due to competition from Brazil: Brazil has better
crop harvesting automation whereas America has Mexicans.

The reason the Roman empire never developed an adcanced technological
society is because of the availabillity of cheap labour. Steam was
confined to gimmicks such as opening tempe doors.

You can buy a system for $300 US dollars to mow your lawn.

You can buy another system for a little more that


Automated Lawnmower:
http://www.friendlymachines.com/

Or a robot vacuum cleaner
http://www.ferret.com.au/articles/58/0c016058.asp


There is a better way to grow and improve our life than through the
delusional sham of 'growth' by masses of cheap low skilled labour and a
few elites that benefit.
From:Dorian West
Subject:Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?
Date:Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:44:34 -0000

wrote in message
news:1105780476.882898.149870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> American Renaisance did a bid of an expose' on the myth of the Staunch
> Family Oriented Mexican.
>
> That cheap labour also has disadvantages beyond the 3-4 times higher
> crime rate that mexicans bring. There is the displacement of White
> children from part time jobs and the displacement of the small White
> underclass from menial work and of course the displacement of the large
> Black underclass from gainfull employment. These groups once had a
> place or small nicche in society: a place to start from, to have
> respect or to at least eek a reasonable life and spirit.
>
> Here is a link: http://www.vdare.com/francis/heather.htm
> "Hispanic youths, whether recent arrivals or birthright American
> citizens," she reports "are developing an underclass culture....
> Hispanic school dropout rates and teen birthrates are now the highest
> in the nation. Gang crime is exploding nationally -- rising 50 percent
> from 1999 to 2002-driven by the march of Hispanic immigration east
> and north across the country. Most worrisome, underclass indicators
> like crime and single parenthood do not improve over successive
> generations of Hispanics-they worsen."
> *******
>
> Then there is the massive subsidisation of the health care system, the
> provision of 'affirmitive action' to the the cost of Whites in either
> higher expenses or displacement of otherwise adaquet Whites from
> education and work. Becuase they are "White"
>
> Consider the parasitc effect of the large 'diversitycrat' career crowd,
> the perversion of our politicians by hispandering.
>
> That cheap labour is starting to look expensive.
>
> What good is having the cheapest labour? It doesn't make a great
> society even for elites. The blowback is too inevitable to severe.
>
> There are few menial tasks that can't be done better with automation.
> There is not a fruit or vegetable that can not be harvested
> automatically by machinary. By providing cheap often illegal labour we
> displace the deployment of already existing automation that is of no
> great complexity. Managers and lawyers become a little lazy, the kinds
> of people that would rather hire 100 Mexicans illegally than hire a
> skilled contrator or hire an engineer and a few technicians to come up
> with a scheme. It encourages laziness. It encourages the development
> of low paying low tech nation and industries. The Califorania orange
> industry is reeling due to competition from Brazil: Brazil has better
> crop harvesting automation whereas America has Mexicans.
>
> The reason the Roman empire never developed an adcanced technological
> society is because of the availabillity of cheap labour. Steam was
> confined to gimmicks such as opening tempe doors.
>
> You can buy a system for $300 US dollars to mow your lawn.
>
> You can buy another system for a little more that

Yes, but I want a beautiful, nubile slave girl to do that for me. I am
willing to pay 100 times the price for this. Can anyone accommodate my Roman
thinking? BTW, the Greek who invented the steam jet in about 200AD (or was
that 200BC?) was only a small time scale away from inventing the steam
engine. There was a Welsh TV special about these ancient Graeco-Roman
achievements and how many of them were unable to be taken that extra step
further due loss of knowledge transfer from such events as the burning of
the Alexandria library.

Anyway to stay on topic, the Mexicans may be the "dumbest immigrant group",
but have they been given the chances to show their true potential or are
they just exploited?



> Automated Lawnmower:
> http://www.friendlymachines.com/
>
> Or a robot vacuum cleaner
> http://www.ferret.com.au/articles/58/0c016058.asp
>
>
> There is a better way to grow and improve our life than through the
> delusional sham of 'growth' by masses of cheap low skilled labour and a
> few elites that benefit.
>
   

Copyright © 2006 newsgroups-index   -   All rights reserved   -   Impressum