|
|
 | | From: | Xah Lee | | Subject: | Why did Feminism arise | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 01:43:59 -0800 |
|
|
 | It is not a question, that the frail is of no match to the virile
when conflict arises. So, throughout centuries male dominate
everything with respect to female. However, technology in the 19th 20th
centuries changed all this. Brute muscle force has little collective
value in the social structure of the post-industrialization or the
information era of 21th century. Therefore, the females of the base
human animals, rises from below with a VENGEANCE, parallel to the speed
of technology. It is not a matter of a harmonious conferential outcome
between the men and women. Rather, since the muscle-free modern social
structure gives little advantage to men over women, the males are
unable to stop the rise of females even if they wanted to. As human
animals, the physically stronger half did not let their weaker half
rise without a fight. In the past it is males or male groups fighting
and killing other males or groups. Now, jostling for power and killing
is literally no longer a job sole to men. Women, can do, and will do,
as atrocious and heartless as men can ever be.
Despite the exponential nature of technological advancement, it has
nevertheless not yet eliminated the root of all uality: pregnancy. A
human animal's pregnancy lasts about a year. A year is not a short
time. More or less every woman goes through pregnancy at least once in
her life, and the effect of this on the power struggle between the
es is not insignificant and is to women's disadvantage. Pregnant
women cannot work, for instance. Hence, among however tech advanced
nations, the power of es in human animal's society is still not
totally equal and men have the edge, partly also due to past momentum.
Many women, especially genetically militant ones, complains and lobbies
for ual equality also known as feminism. (beginning with late 20th
century) Calling for justice is merely a pretext. What drives and lies
beneath is the core animal instinct, a unending quest for unlimited
power, extending beyond equality to the ability to control, hurt, kill
men at will, just as the virile has done to the frail to
various degrees in the past.
feminism is like a oxymoron. On the surface it is a redress of women's
rights, deep in its core is the inevitability and vengeance of the fair
, escorted by the fallout of technology.
As you now have a clear picture of the nature of feminism, it may not
help directly in decisions and thoughts, but dwell in it will shape or
reshape your outlook on any issue between the es, and you'll be able
to make decisions or behaviors based on at least truth. What you need
now for doing good, is good will.
this essay is archived at:
http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/t1/20040403_fem_fatale.html
Copyright 2004 by Xah Lee. Verbatim reproduction for educational
purposes with full credit is permitted.
Xah
xah@xahlee.org
http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
|
|
| | From: | Roger Bagula | | Subject: | Re: Why did Feminism arise | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:47:41 GMT |
|
|
| Dear Xah Lee,
I think maybe a better question is:
Why did Feminism fail?
You are a very smart Lady.
Heal yourself ...
not all men are "vile beasts".
Xah Lee wrote:
> It is not a question, that the frail is of no match to the virile
> when conflict arises. So, throughout centuries male dominate
> everything with respect to female. However, technology in the 19th 20th
> centuries changed all this. Brute muscle force has little collective
> value in the social structure of the post-industrialization or the
> information era of 21th century. Therefore, the females of the base
> human animals, rises from below with a VENGEANCE, parallel to the speed
> of technology. It is not a matter of a harmonious conferential outcome
> between the men and women. Rather, since the muscle-free modern social
> structure gives little advantage to men over women, the males are
> unable to stop the rise of females even if they wanted to. As human
> animals, the physically stronger half did not let their weaker half
> rise without a fight. In the past it is males or male groups fighting
> and killing other males or groups. Now, jostling for power and killing
> is literally no longer a job sole to men. Women, can do, and will do,
> as atrocious and heartless as men can ever be.
>
>
> Despite the exponential nature of technological advancement, it has
> nevertheless not yet eliminated the root of all uality: pregnancy. A
> human animal's pregnancy lasts about a year. A year is not a short
> time. More or less every woman goes through pregnancy at least once in
> her life, and the effect of this on the power struggle between the
> es is not insignificant and is to women's disadvantage. Pregnant
> women cannot work, for instance. Hence, among however tech advanced
> nations, the power of es in human animal's society is still not
> totally equal and men have the edge, partly also due to past momentum.
> Many women, especially genetically militant ones, complains and lobbies
> for ual equality also known as feminism. (beginning with late 20th
> century) Calling for justice is merely a pretext. What drives and lies
> beneath is the core animal instinct, a unending quest for unlimited
> power, extending beyond equality to the ability to control, hurt, kill
> men at will, just as the virile has done to the frail to
> various degrees in the past.
>
>
> feminism is like a oxymoron. On the surface it is a redress of women's
> rights, deep in its core is the inevitability and vengeance of the fair
> , escorted by the fallout of technology.
>
>
> As you now have a clear picture of the nature of feminism, it may not
> help directly in decisions and thoughts, but dwell in it will shape or
> reshape your outlook on any issue between the es, and you'll be able
> to make decisions or behaviors based on at least truth. What you need
> now for doing good, is good will.
>
>
> this essay is archived at:
> http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/t1/20040403_fem_fatale.html
> Copyright 2004 by Xah Lee. Verbatim reproduction for educational
> purposes with full credit is permitted.
> Xah
> xah@xahlee.org
> http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
>
--
Respectfully, Roger L. Bagula
tftn@earthlink.net, 11759Waterhill Road, Lakeside,Ca 92040-2905,tel:
619-5610814 :
alternative email: rlbtftn@netscape.net
URL : http://home.earthlink.net/~tftn
|
|
| | From: | James Michael Howard | | Subject: | Re: Why did Feminism arise | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:59:42 GMT |
|
|
| Feminism is due to the secular trend, the rise in testosterone in
women with time.
|
|
| | From: | P.Comm | | Subject: | Re: Why did Feminism arise | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:05:47 GMT |
|
|
| "James Michael Howard" wrote in message
news:4mp7v0lh8jkov24d6q27100sqvmo5tl2ds@4ax.com...
> Feminism is due to the secular trend, the rise in testosterone in
> women with time.
I knew you'd show up on here with the T thing, LOL.
It also has a LOT to do with CHOICES women were open to, that they wre not
open to before the rise of "women's rights" first - and then feminism.
Some say that the left wanted to destroy the "family." Others say that the
left just wanted equity for both genders (no matter what resulted from it)
Point being, women do not HAVE to marry a mate chosen by their families,
they don't have to marry anyone, they don't have to stay with a mate anymore
and "bastards" now have rights to own property and vote. And so do women.
Women also have reproductive rights now. They had none of this before, in
fact, blacks could vote in the USA before women could vote! "Bastards"
(illeg kids) had no rights before, either.
Did it fail? Well, some of the more far out feminazi views (lots of
lesbians in that) may have failed for straight women - but also women chose
not to have men as bosses for this social political thing - OR HAVE OTHER
WOMEN as bosses (!!) - and some of those women noticed the "ahem, religion"
of some of those women that would be their leaders and rejected their
values. A lot of women were against ERA because those feminists demanded
women get drafted (like hey? - at a time when MEN were avoiding the draft?).
Feminism also got stuck into the Big L which included affirmative action -
and that Bakke case pissed a lot of women off because it was NOT FAIR.
|
|
|
