|
|
 | | From: | Archimedes Plutonium | | Subject: | Re: is septicaemia murderable? Re: the cause of Dawson's death-- no-one | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:26:14 -0600 |
|
|
 |
ironjustice@aol.com wrote:
> Easily ..
>
> If anemia was diagnosed .. the doctors would 'advise' .. iron .. to be
> infused ..
>
> Iron FEEDS infection .. in fact septicaemia is being treated as we
> speak with iron binding drugs.
> The patient dies IF iron binders are not used .. lives if iron binders
> are not used ..
>
> Hardcore evidence based medicine ..
>
> 'They' have already admitted to .. "it seems we may have inadvertantly
> hastened the deaths of some of our Aids patients by giving them
> prophlactic ... iron .."
>
> So .. yes .. again .. if one wishes to kill someone using 'established'
> .. standard of care .. it is .. easily .. accomplished ..
>
> Who loves ya.
> Tom
>
I suppose the modern word for it is Sepsis. And is a buildup of toxin
carrying bacteria in the bloodstream.
But, Tom, what I was wondering is whether sepsis can be injected into a
person in order to murder them. Can sepsis be as anthrax in transmission
or transfer only instead of breathing that of drinking or inoculation. So
can sepsis be a murder weapon of ease??
Does anyone know if Arthur Doyle (author of Sherlock Holmes) was present
during Charles Dawson illness at his bedside, or perhaps he was in the
hospital in 1916?
I mean, it looks all to be a natural death for Charles Dawson, but one
should check all the i's dotted and t's crossed.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
