|
|
 | | From: | mikegordge at xtra.co.nz | | Subject: | Re: Shaking Up Trade Theory | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 10:14:22 -0800 |
|
|
 | NOTE for rust if this comes in twice it is because my computer said
*Could not be posted* or such like.
D reckons
*Good economies should be sustainable.*
What does that mean?
A good enonomy is the one that does not hinder prosperity.
A good economy is very simply one that allows, indeed a *good* economy
is one that upholds the moral right for, each and every peaceful
individual to choose and live by their own values.
The use of the word *sustainable* and indeed *conservative* anywhere
near politics should scare the living bejeezus out of any rational
thinking person.
Progress, required for prosperity, does not come from ANYTHING *staying
the same* progress does not come from things being *conserved*
There is no greater oxymoron we hear today than the statists come
greensists, phrase of *sustainable development*
How the fuck can anything *develope when it stays the fucken same*?
Stalin *First confuse the vocabulary*
Michael Gordge
|
|
| | From: | David | | Subject: | Re: Shaking Up Trade Theory | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:14:53 +1300 |
|
|
|
Sustainable resources are renewable resources.
People said that the Clyde Dam was a renewable resource.
However it was created just in time to avoid serious flooding
caused by the Roxburgh Dam
Lake Dunstan will be silted full in 180 years.
Oil is not a sustainable resource.
Some foods and forestry for example might be.
If existence here on earth is not sustainable
in some shape or form. Then existence is not guarenteed.
-D
wrote in message
news:1106504062.001065.105550@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> NOTE for rust if this comes in twice it is because my computer said
> *Could not be posted* or such like.
>
> D reckons
>
> *Good economies should be sustainable.*
>
> What does that mean?
>
> A good enonomy is the one that does not hinder prosperity.
>
> A good economy is very simply one that allows, indeed a *good* economy
> is one that upholds the moral right for, each and every peaceful
> individual to choose and live by their own values.
>
> The use of the word *sustainable* and indeed *conservative* anywhere
> near politics should scare the living bejeezus out of any rational
> thinking person.
>
> Progress, required for prosperity, does not come from ANYTHING *staying
> the same* progress does not come from things being *conserved*
>
> There is no greater oxymoron we hear today than the statists come
> greensists, phrase of *sustainable development*
>
> How the fuck can anything *develope when it stays the fucken same*?
> Stalin *First confuse the vocabulary*
>
>
> Michael Gordge
>
|
|
| | From: | Redbaiter | | Subject: | Re: Shaking Up Trade Theory | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:34:01 +1300 |
|
|
| mikegordge@xtra.co.nz says
> NOTE for rust if this comes in twice it is because my computer said
> *Could not be posted* or such like.
>
It comes in twice because you're a retard.
>
> The use of the word *sustainable* and indeed *conservative* anywhere
> near politics should scare the living bejeezus out of any rational
> thinking person.
You would never know anything about what any rational thinking
person might be scared off you sad fuckwit. Anyone so daft as to
say there is no difference between the governments of Cuba and
the USA, and is apparently ignorant of those brave Cubans,
fathers, mothers children and whole families who risk their
lives to travel to the US, deserves to be seen only as a crazed
fool, a supporter of tyrants, an enemy of freedom, and a
cowardly betrayer of those Cubans and everybody else seeking
freedom from tyranny.
Fuck off you nauseating lowlife.
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
"At the core of modern liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding,
ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a
philosophy of sniveling brats." PJ O'Rourke
|
|
|
