|
|
 | | From: | Redbaiter | | Subject: | Re: Typical Gay bigotry. | | Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 12:09:27 +1300 |
|
|
 | Dr.Dog says
> >
> > These are mere emotive assertions with no basis in logic.
>
> Try to sit still, now, and think.
Try to get fucked with your patronising school teacher
mannerisms, you ill mannered fuckwit.
> You raised NAMBLA; I countered with
> the Renee Guyon Society. My aim was to show that paedophilia, including
> the organized form, comes in both colours. Mt secondary aim was to show
> how silly it is to name some fringe organization and use it to attempt
> to define what people are.
Nobody denies it comes in "both colours" you time wasting loon.
The argument is about its being more prevalent in the homoual
community.
>
> This you claim is "emotive...with no basis in logic." That's a REALLY
> stupid assertion. "Emotive" was raising NAMBLA in the first place.
You asked for citations. You don't want them, don't ask for
them. I'm not capable of dealing with this kind of womanish
uncertainty of purpose with any patience I'm sorry.
> >
> > You asked for citations. This amounts to an admission of
> > ignorance concerning the issue.
>
> It amounts to nothing of the kind. It was and remains a challenge to
> those who make the claim that homouals are predisposed to
> paedophilia.
Its no challenge. Its boring claptrap.
>
> > You have not answered my query.
>
> What query?
>
> > What was the purpose behind your deception?
>
> What deception?
Go away. You have now moved from deception to smoke screening.
>
> > > The rest of your stuff is plain foolishness. "Homoual agenda."
> Yeah,
> > > the Homintern, no doubt, plotting in a Moscow cellar. Idiot.
> >
> > More devastating logic. You sure are a compelling debater Doc.
>
>
> Somewhat more versed in it that a troll who uses phrases like "the
> homoual agenda."
>
The homoual agenda is a reality, most recently illustrated by
the attempts of two local homoual advocacy groups to prevent
TV stations from polling on homoual issues.
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
"Leftists- The enemies of classic liberalism"
|
|
| | From: | Tilly | | Subject: | Re: Typical Gay bigotry. | | Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:48:04 +1300 |
|
|
| Redbaiter wrote:
> You asked for citations. You don't want them, don't ask for
> them. I'm not capable of dealing with this kind of womanish
> uncertainty of purpose with any patience I'm sorry.
This is your way of weasling out of having to name the source ,because it
would make you look silly if you did.
What have you got to hide?
> Go away. You have now moved from deception to smoke screening.
Sounds like you are defining yourself.
BTW I read this thread without having any personal agenda whatseoever .
The fact is you are citing nameless sources and refuse to give the source.
Either front up or shutup or you will have exposed yourself as a gutless
bigot Redbaiter.
>>
>>>> The rest of your stuff is plain foolishness. "Homoual agenda."
>>>> Yeah, the Homintern, no doubt, plotting in a Moscow cellar. Idiot.
>>>
>>> More devastating logic. You sure are a compelling debater Doc.
>>
>>
>> Somewhat more versed in it that a troll who uses phrases like "the
>> homoual agenda."
>>
> The homoual agenda is a reality, most recently illustrated by
> the attempts of two local homoual advocacy groups to prevent
> TV stations from polling on homoual issues.
Redbaiter ,have you attended a homoual advocacy group, or is this more BS
from nameless sources? Somebody told you third hand what happens in them ,so
you believe it? As if a homoual is going to confide in you ! LOL
--
Tilly
striking1583REMOVE@yahoo.co.nz
|
|
|
