|
|
 | | From: | Redbaiter | | Subject: | Re: Typical Gay bigotry. | | Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 11:55:51 +1300 |
|
|
 | Dr.Dog says
>
> > >
> > > So all citations must simply be accepted uncritically?
> >
> > Not at all, but criticism is easy. Refuting them is the hard
> > part, which is why there's been zilch of that from you.
>
> You have reading comprehension problems, it appears.
And your opinion on such a mater is worth expressing here for
what reason??
> You mention a
> homoual paedophile society; I mention a heteroual one that you
> had no doubt never heard of, and you don't even have the grace to admit
> how stupid your original mention was. It proves nothing about
> homouals, any more than mine proves something about heterouals.
These are mere emotive assertions with no basis in logic.
>
> You quote a cop. You quote a sources that reports another source that
> reports another source, the latter uncited. The only one of your
> sources that has any surface credibility was the first one, and I have
> agreed to look that one up.
You asked for citations. This amounts to an admission of
ignorance concerning the issue. You have not answered my query.
What was the purpose behind your deception?
>
> The rest of your stuff is plain foolishness. "Homoual agenda." Yeah,
> the Homintern, no doubt, plotting in a Moscow cellar. Idiot.
More devastating logic. You sure are a compelling debater Doc.
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
"Leftists- The enemies of classic liberalism"
|
|
| | From: | Tilly | | Subject: | Re: Typical Gay bigotry. | | Date: | Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:41:05 +1300 |
|
|
| Redbaiter wrote:
>
> You asked for citations.
A citation without naming the source has no meaning!
Surely you know that Red.
This amounts to an admission of
> ignorance concerning the issue. You have not answered my query.
> What was the purpose behind your deception?
You are the deceptive one. If your source was an unbiased one you would name
them.
>> The rest of your stuff is plain foolishness. "Homoual agenda."
>> Yeah, the Homintern, no doubt, plotting in a Moscow cellar. Idiot.
>
> More devastating logic. You sure are a compelling debater Doc.
You are looking very stupid here Red.
--
Tilly
striking1583REMOVE@yahoo.co.nz
|
|
|
