|
|
 | | From: | Edmund Fitzgerald | | Subject: | CARTEL WATCH BRAZIL | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:26:48 -0500 |
|
|
 | From: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inimr-ri.nsf/en/gr119248e.html
CARTEL WATCH BRAZIL
The Brazilian competition law agencies have stepped up anti-cartel enforcement and made cartel prosecution a priority for 2003 and 2004. To date over 260 cartel investigations have been conducted into industries as diverse as marine transportation, steel, and orange juice, including some cartels such as vitamins and lysine that have been vigorously investigated and prosecuted by a number of other jurisdictions around the world.
Federal Law 8.884 of 11 June 1994 defines violations of the economic order as: "any act in any way intended or otherwise able to.... limit or restrain free competition (or)...control a relevant market..." Five specific types of collusive practices that produce such effects are identified as: price fixing, market division, bid-rigging, uniform practices and restrictive agreements. Cartels are defined in CADE Resolution 20/98 as "...specific arrangements, explicit or tacit, made by competitors in the same market and covering a substantial part of the relevant market, involving matters such as prices, production quotas and territorial distribution and allocation, in a joint attempt to raise prices and profits to near monopoly levels."
Cartel investigations are initiated by the Secretariat of Economic Accompaniment (SEAE) or the Secretariat of Economic Defense (SDE), either ex officio or by third party complaint. The SDE presides over the case, conducts the final hearings and submits an investigative report to the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), with recommendation to prosecute or to absolve the accused firms. When investigations are commenced by the SDE, the SEAE performs supplementary investigations and prepares technical opinions to be included in a final report to CADE. CADE as the adjudicative body makes the final administrative decision, which is subject to judicial review by the Federal Courts. If the firms are found in violation, CADE will sentence them to monetary fines that range from 1 to 30 percent of their annual sales.
Ten to 50 percent percent of the amount of the fine imposed against the legal entity may be imposed against individual company officers who acted on behalf of the corporate offender. Such fines must be borne by the individuals and may not be paid by the company.
Criminal Prosecution
In addition to the administrative prosecution carried out by the SDE, cartels have been prosecuted criminally as well. Law 8.137 of 27 December 1990 defines cartel formation as a crime, punishable with imprisonment of from two to five years.
Leniency Program
Federal Law 10.149 of 21 December 2000 implemented a leniency program designed to encourage parties involved in cartel conspiracies to cooperate with authorities and provide evidence of illegal activities. Law 10.149/00 provides anti-trust authorities with the power to grant administrative amnesty associated with full, automatic criminal immunity for conspirators cooperating with antitrust investigations, particularly important in a system where cartels are prosecuted both administratively and criminally.
Law 10.149/00 establishes that the SDE may grant full amnesty or reduce by one or two-thirds the penalty applicable to individuals or corporations that have violated anti-trust law and choose to collaborate with the investigations. Leniency agreements are only valid provided the SDE does not already have enough evidence to secure the conviction of the corporation or individual at the time the agreement is proposed. The leniency program together with the new investigative powers also introduced by Law 10.149/00 have enabled Brazilian antitrust authorities to increase monitoring and prosecution of cartel agreements among competitors.
Bilateral Treaties On 26 October 1999 Brazil and the United States signed a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty to facilitate cooperation among their antitrust agencies for international cartel enforcement. The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty entered into full force in June 2002 and will be put to the test for the first time in the investigation of an alleged agreement between Enron and AES to rig a bid for the privatization of a Brazilian power company in April 1998. On 12 December 2001, Brazil also signed an anti-trust cooperation agreement with the Russian Federation. Another important development in international cartel enforcement was the confirmation of Brazil's association with the "OECD's Recommendation Concerning Effective Action Against Hard Core Cartels".
More informations, please contact: MARCONDES ADVOGADOS ASSOCIADOS Av. Paulista, 949 - 3rd, 4th, 6th and 9th floors São Paulo - SP Brazil - CEP 01311-917 Tel.: (55 11) 3253-9199 - Fax.: (55 11) 3285-2121 www.marcondes.com.br
|
|
|