 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:05:20 -0600 |
|
|
 | From the Australian TV news today:
3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for that.
House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through legal system,
3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing a man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!!
What a shit bigoted country !!!!
Cat is alive with only broken leg, 7 men die every day from the Government enforced suicide.
Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.
Where is God or human justice to wipe out judiciary and other bigoted idiots from this country cursed by fatherless children?
ACT legislative assembly = MURDERERS !!!
Thank you brainless poofs and lesbians sitting in the ACT legal institutions !!!
|
|
 | | From: | Darkfalz | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | 22 Jan 2005 04:25:02 -0800 |
|
|
 | The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out. If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place. LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she should be taken away as well.
MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:16:45 GMT |
|
|
 | Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com writes:
> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's > usually their fault relationships fail
Rubbish.
I know several men whose relationships failed because of substance abuse, violence or marital infidelity.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:18:42 -0000 |
|
|
 | "israel t" wrote in message news:87sm4sz90q.fsf@kafka.homenet... > Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com writes: > >> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's >> usually their fault relationships fail > > Rubbish. > > I know several men whose relationships failed because of > substance abuse, violence or marital infidelity of wife.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:51:00 GMT |
|
|
 | "Elsa Sylvan" writes:
> Because you are an idiot without any sense for other people.
I guess that english is not your first language...
|
|
 | | From: | Kevin V. Russell | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:24:55 GMT |
|
|
 | "Darkfalz" wrote in message news:1106396702.147387.155310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives > issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on > the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about > battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The > guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out. > If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place. > LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect > the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she > should be taken away as well. > > MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE.
And the murdering fuckwit who killed his wife because she told him he was a lousy lay?
What should he get?
>
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:11:46 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message news:41f30af6$1@news.comindico.com.au... > > "Darkfalz" wrote in message > news:1106396702.147387.155310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives >> issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on >> the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about >> battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The >> guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out. >> If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place. >> LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect >> the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she >> should be taken away as well. >> >> MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE. > > And the murdering fuckwit who killed his wife because she told him he was > a lousy lay? > > What should he get? >
Medal as Australian of the year. Until now, only homouals and freemason are Australians of the year and it's about time to honour one strong man following natural instincts.
By the way, the number of murdered husbands by wife is many times higher than number of murdered wives. As far as I remember it is 150 women against more than 3,500 men (poufs like you are counted as woman).
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:51:52 GMT |
|
|
 | "Elsa Sylvan" writes:
> housing is expensive because the most of bricklayers > were forced to suicide by the courts and wives
LOL !
You are classic !
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:34:22 GMT |
|
|
 | Sylvia Else writes:
> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to > domestic violence, separation, and divorce.
True.
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:24 +1100 |
|
|
 | "israel t" wrote in message news:87fz0r5iid.fsf@kafka.homenet... > Sylvia Else writes: > >> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to >> domestic violence, separation, and divorce. > > True.
L I E !!! Everyone is affected by prosecution of straight people. Freedom to act naturally is described in the law as abuse. 50% of Australian children are now in fatherless family.
Another proof:
Most of men who suicide were immigrants from traditional marriage countries. They were for example bricklayers. Today, the price of one day of bricklayers work (420 bricks) is up to $1,200. This is cash per day - housing is expensive because the most of bricklayers were forced to suicide by the courts and wives. If you are buying house, most of us do, you have to pay for court games and conspiracy of men holocaust in Australia.
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:50:06 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Elsa Sylvan wrote:
> Freedom to act naturally is described in the law as abuse.
Where does the law say that?
> 50% of Australian > children are now in fatherless family.
Let's see now...
http://tinyurl.com/47mdb
Line 15 - children under 15 in single-parent families, as a percentage of all children under 15.
The figure is 19.9% for 2003. That includes families with no mothers, so 19.9% is only an upper limit on the number of children in families without a father. Rather less than the 50% claimed.
BTW, lines 11 and 12 together tell us that 11% of all single parent families contain a father rather than a mother.
That's the trouble with the ABS - they keep providing that annoying factual data.
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:37:41 GMT |
|
|
 | "Citrus Juice" writes:
>>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party. >> > Family First is the name.
Thanks. I now know who to despise.
Do you think that your taunting of s and others does your party or your beliefs any good ?
And you are supposed to be a Christian party.
What would your precious Lord say of such behaviour by one of his so called followers.
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:21:32 +1100 |
|
|
 | "israel t" wrote in message news:878y6j5icv.fsf@kafka.homenet... > "Citrus Juice" writes: > >>>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party. >>> >> Family First is the name. > > Thanks. > I now know who to despise. >
You despise everyone except yourself. Because you are an idiot without any sense for other people.
|
|
 | | From: | Chasing Kate | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:21:28 +1030 |
|
|
 | bernxard@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing > it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse > died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun. > > Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice?
That is such a stupid argument.
Typical do gooder attitude
|
|
 | | From: | Candle | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:46:09 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:21:28 +1030, Chasing Kate wrote:
> bernxard@yahoo.com.au wrote: > >> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing >> it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse >> died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun. >> >> Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice? > > > > That is such a stupid argument.
What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers? > > Typical do gooder attitude
|
|
 | | From: | regn.pickford | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:04:25 GMT |
|
|
 | "Anonymous" wrote in message news:35efsjF4lrj4cU1@individual.net... > From the Australian TV news today: > > 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for > that. >
They exhibited healthy natural urges for their youth searching out some of `lifes lessons'
This media circus is about justifying having big brother recording you everywhere doing everything.
The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us did.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:21:59 GMT |
|
|
 | >>> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see >>> them. >> >> Rubbish. >> I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives. > > Is this because you are unemployed.or is because in Jewish families there is > order.
Unfortunately, I am not unemployed. Unfortunately because I dislike Monday mornings.
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:42:01 +1100 |
|
|
 |
regn.pickford wrote:
> The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us > did.
Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be cruel to animals.
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | Kevin V. Russell | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:22:45 GMT |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > regn.pickford wrote: > >> The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of >> us >> did. > > Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be cruel > to animals. > > Sylvia.
Me neither Sylvia.
The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).
|
|
 | | From: | Jacques Guy | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:31:18 +1000 |
|
|
 | Kevin V. Russell wrote: > The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).
It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:05:14 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Jacques Guy" wrote in message news:41F31A86.4D84@alphalink.com.au... > Kevin V. Russell wrote: > >> The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more). > > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see them. If they try to say something to them and prevent them doing bad things it is called harassment and they may even go to jail for that,
Our society is totally deviated by stupid control-freaks who are punishing normal human behaviour and promote sterile society.
The best solution would be IMHO deleting ALL human made laws and go back to elementary 10 Commandments.
Regarding killing or torturing the cats and other animals - this is the right given to people by God (according to the Bible, Torah and Koran) and because more than 80 % of Australians claim they believe to God, kids should be set free and police judged and punished for restriction of God's given freedom and harassing children.
We have too much cats and dogs in Australia and the number of animals should be reduced. Cats kill birds and lizard so it is right that cats may be killed or tortured on the same way they torture their prey.
BTW the cat tortured was the ugliest I ever seen, and you feel sorry for her, take it home and hide it from people with good taste.
|
|
 | | From: | Chasing Kate | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:24:04 +1030 |
|
|
 | Jacques Guy wrote:
> Kevin V. Russell wrote: > > > The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more). > > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
How so????
|
|
 | | From: | Jacques Guy | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:15:24 +1000 |
|
|
 | Chasing Kate wrote:
> > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it. > > How so????
Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up?
The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??
|
|
 | | From: | Chasing Kate | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:32:02 +1030 |
|
|
 | Jacques Guy wrote:
> Chasing Kate wrote: > > > > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it. > > > > How so???? > > Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up? > > The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the > Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??
I agree with you 100%
But with these kids did they even have parents who were around to give a toss about them?
As for school do we know what they were like there? No I imagine we don't.... They could have been terrible little shits for all we know.
You can't lump the raising of kids on a school as they have enough trouble keeping the little brats in line in other classes....
This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit.
|
|
 | | From: | Nomen Nescio | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:26:47 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Chasing Kate" wrote in message news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net... > Jacques Guy wrote: > >> Chasing Kate wrote: >> > > This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit. >
Exactly !!! THE MARRIAGES ACT
"Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life"
Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act.
Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations.
All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government.
All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be forced to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever.
The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged.
|
|
 | | From: | Kevin V. Russell | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:21:16 GMT |
|
|
 | "Nomen Nescio" wrote in message news:35hn14F4nm9ntU1@individual.net... > > "Chasing Kate" wrote in message > news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net... >> Jacques Guy wrote: >> >>> Chasing Kate wrote: >>> >> >> This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit. >> > > Exactly !!! > THE MARRIAGES ACT > > > "Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a > woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life" > > Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act.
The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that are there because YOU put them there.
If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF THEM by voting them out.
Good luck. > > Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations.
No they are not. The Family Law Act was passed by Parliament. It's validity at law has never been seriously challenged given the Commonwealth has the consitutional power to pass such laws. > > All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government.
What? > > All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be > forced to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever. What? > > The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged.
It was Lionel Murphy you bonehead. > >
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:39:17 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Kevin V. Russell wrote:
> The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does > not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that > are there because YOU put them there. > > If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF THEM > by voting them out.
Well, that's the theory. In practice, the Government has a lot of control, because there are all sorts of sanctions (non-promotion to ministerial positions, disendorsement by the party, etc) that can be brought to bear on MPs who don't toe the party line.
Add to that factionalisation within the party, and the system's about as undemocratic as it's possible for a nominally democratic system to be. The only good thing going for it is that it's better than most of the other systems in use around the world.
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:39:36 +0800 |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f435a5$0$4095$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > Kevin V. Russell wrote: > >> The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government >> does not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and >> senators that are there because YOU put them there. >> >> If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF >> THEM by voting them out. > > Well, that's the theory. In practice, the Government has a lot of control, > because there are all sorts of sanctions (non-promotion to ministerial > positions, disendorsement by the party, etc) that can be brought to bear > on MPs who don't toe the party line.
True, and we all know that. So why are we all pretending that our dictatorship is democracy?
> > Add to that factionalisation within the party, and the system's about as > undemocratic as it's possible for a nominally democratic system to be. The > only good thing going for it is that it's better than most of the other > systems in use around the world. >
Can you please post some examples of other systems worse than Australian? I've done my search and Australian legal system is absolute champion in manipulating elections. Even US Bush can learn some tricks from us. No legal system in the whole world (and in much more populated countries) murder 7 men every day for nothing. There were some in the past, but in today's world Australia is absolute champion in genocide and holocaust category.
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:58:50 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Elsa Sylvan wrote:
> Can you please post some examples of other systems worse than Australian? > I've done my search and Australian legal system is absolute champion in > manipulating elections. Even US Bush can learn some tricks from us. > No legal system in the whole world (and in much more populated countries) > murder 7 men every day for nothing. There were some in the past, but in > today's world Australia is absolute champion in genocide and holocaust > category.
I was thinking of military dictatorships, that kind thing.
Also, look at the UK's first past the post electoral system that really does make a vote for a minority party a wasted vote. That has to be less democratic that Australia's system.
At least we appear to have an honest judiciary who are pretty much immune to actual or implied threats from the executive Government (which I suspect is the only reason those threats don't appear).
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | Nomen Nescio | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:44:10 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message news:41f3f92b$1@news.comindico.com.au... > > "Nomen Nescio" wrote in message > news:35hn14F4nm9ntU1@individual.net... >> >> "Chasing Kate" wrote in message >> news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net... >>> Jacques Guy wrote: >>> >>>> Chasing Kate wrote: >>>> >>> >>> This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit. >>> >> >> Exactly !!! >> THE MARRIAGES ACT >> >> >> "Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a >> woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life" >> >> Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act. > > The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does > not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that > are there because YOU put them there. > > If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF > THEM by voting them out. > > Good luck. >> >> Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations. > > No they are not. The Family Law Act was passed by Parliament. It's > validity at law has never been seriously challenged given the Commonwealth > has the consitutional power to pass such laws. >> >> All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government. > > What?
Many think it should be: All decisions of Family Court and Child Support Agency should be reversed to "who is guilty for ending a marriage should pay all the costs incurred by ending the marriage". If end was caused by an intruder to marriage and he/she can't pay all damages, former decision makers (judges or people from CSA) have to reimburse all money or damages should be paid by the government who put incompetent and immoral judges in position to destroy families.
Why? .. BECAUSE BY DEFINITION MARRIAGE IS FOR LIFE (and you and others can think whatever you and they want, same like I think I should not repay the house taken from me by the Family Court but I am FORCED to pay because I signed the contract). This is the base of the law ignored in Australia due to stupidity and lack of logic of lawmakers. Everything else than forcing the guilty person(s) causing destroying of functioning elementary unit of society (which is family consisting of man + woman + ?children) is nothing else than discrimination and exploitation of innocent by corrupted legal system, not only to innocent partner in marriage but also to children who usually suffer (some of them all life) because one of the parents decided to lie on marriage date and change partner or live brothel style of life.
>> >> All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be >> forced to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever. > What? >> >> The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged. > > It was Lionel Murphy you bonehead. >>
Whoever did it was very sick and immoral person. Whoever support such stupid idea that anarchy in human relationship is better than order and decency and try to enforce this should be executed in the name of justice, humanity and morality. I suggest former Chief Justice of Family Court who even went step further and decided to change to 14 years old girl should be the first to be hanged.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:06:52 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Jacques Guy" wrote in message news:41F34F0C.7DD8@alphalink.com.au... > Chasing Kate wrote: > >> > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it. >> >> How so???? > > Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up? > > The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the > Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??
Freemasons amd homouals writing the law?
|
|
 | | From: | regn.pickford | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:31:29 GMT |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > regn.pickford wrote: > > > The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us > > did. > > Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be > cruel to animals.
Maybe you weren't.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:16:54 -0000 |
|
|
 | "regn.pickford" wrote in message news:lWLId.130740$K7.77795@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > "Sylvia Else" wrote in message > news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... >> >> >> regn.pickford wrote: >> >> > The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of > us >> > did. >> >> Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be >> cruel to animals. > > Maybe you weren't. > >
Her choice is cruelty against men.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:33:14 GMT |
|
|
 | "regn.pickford" writes:
>> 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for >> that.
The do-gooders ( never thought that I would use that phrase ) will make sure that the kids get community service.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:33:13 GMT |
|
|
 | Candle writes:
>> That is such a stupid argument. > > What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?
The fact that they have broken the law.
BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy. All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the offence.
3 years is the maximum that they can be given.
However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6 kittens, all they got was a 1000 $ fine.
For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on the hands.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:55:29 -0000 |
|
|
 | "israel t" wrote in message news:877jm4r16n.fsf@kafka.homenet... > Candle writes: > >>> That is such a stupid argument. >> >> What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers? > > The fact that they have broken the law. > > BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy. > All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the > offence. > > 3 years is the maximum that they can be given. > > However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6 > kittens, > all they got was a 1000 $ fine.
But this was education for this Iraq prison, isn'y it?
> > For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on > the hands.
Just like this woman torturer get while man get 10 years and ungraceful dismissal. Discrimination against the men again in practice.
|
|
 | | From: | Heretic | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:52:26 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:33:13 +0000, israel t wrote:
> Candle writes: > >>> That is such a stupid argument. >> >> What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers? > > The fact that they have broken the law.
It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break the law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention? > BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy. > All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the > offence. > > 3 years is the maximum that they can be given. > > However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6 > kittens, all they got was a 1000 $ fine. > > For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on > the hands.
If so, that is the consequence of them having broken the law. You obviously want more. What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:49:58 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Heretic wrote:
> It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break the > law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention?
Maybe there's something particularly repugnant about crimes which involve needless and pointless infliction of suffering on a creature that has no way of defending itself.
There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be limited to animals.
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | RT | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:30:08 +1000 |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f37347$0$2195$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > Heretic wrote: > >> It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break >> the >> law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention?
> Maybe there's something particularly repugnant about crimes which involve > needless and pointless infliction of suffering on a creature that has no > way of defending itself.
You got it
> There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be > limited to animals. > > Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:30:32 GMT |
|
|
 | Chasing Kate writes:
>> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing >> it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse >> died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun. >> >> Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice? > > That is such a stupid argument. > Typical do gooder attitude
I have seen a tree fall on a person and kill them.
So why should we punish murderers when they are only doing what trees do to people ?
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:15:17 GMT |
|
|
 | "Anonymous" writes:
>> However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6 >> kittens, >> all they got was a 1000 $ fine. > But this was education for this Iraq prison, isn'y it?
True.
Perhaps their lawyer should have used," Just training to torture the Iraquis " as their defence.
They would have got off scot free without even a fine.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:13:12 GMT |
|
|
 | Sylvia Else writes:
> There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be > limited to animals.
There have been studies linking extreme cruelty to animals ( not just tugging on a cat's tail ) to future criminal behaviour.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:23:44 GMT |
|
|
 | "Anonymous" writes:
> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see > them.
Rubbish. I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:16:10 -0000 |
|
|
 | "israel t" wrote in message news:87oefgz8p3.fsf@kafka.homenet... > "Anonymous" writes: > >> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see >> them. > > Rubbish. > I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives.
Is this because you are unemployed.or is because in Jewish families there is order. Father is the God's representative in the house.
In modern Australian parenting, there is no respect for father. Result is chaos.
|
|
 | | From: | ROUNDTABLE | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:14:40 GMT |
|
|
 | You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the world due to your stupidity or go to jail.
"regn.pickford" wrote in message news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
: The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us : did. : : : : : : : :
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:42:49 +1100 |
|
|
 | "ROUNDTABLE" wrote in message news:41f36aff$1@news.comindico.com.au... > You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably > lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain > dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the > world due to your stupidity or go to jail.
At least he is not a top-poster like you.
> > "regn.pickford" wrote in message > news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > : The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of > us > : did. > : > : > : > : > : > : > : > : > >
|
|
 | | From: | regn.pickford | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:10:53 GMT |
|
|
 | "ROUNDTABLE" wrote in message news:41f36aff$1@news.comindico.com.au... > You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably > lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain > dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the > world due to your stupidity or go to jail. > > "regn.pickford" wrote in message > news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > : The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us > : did.
Please avoid top posting as it is annoying.
|
|
 | | From: | israel t | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:24:54 GMT |
|
|
 | "Anonymous" writes:
>> Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up? >> >> The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the >> Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama?? > > Freemasons amd homouals writing the law?
And what happened to parental responsibility ? Off in ga-ga-land with delusions of persecution ?
|
|
 | | From: | Darkfalz | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 04:33:07 -0800 |
|
|
 | It's a midday movie industry, this husband killing business.
|
|
 | | From: | Darkfalz | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 04:21:31 -0800 |
|
|
 | Yes it is. :-(
She has destroyed so many innocent lives.
|
|
 | | From: | Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 02:08:38 -0800 |
|
|
 | Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who will listen.
|
|
 | | From: | Hunter1 | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:45:47 +0800 |
|
|
 | Oh christ, the limp-wristed women hating fags are back yet again....
Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com wrote: > Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's > usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to > get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who > will listen. >
|
|
 | | From: | Nomen Nescio | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:00:41 -0700 |
|
|
 | Oh Christ, the limp-wristed men hating fags are back yet again....
How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again? You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.
BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against women.
We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their marriages.
Have a problem with this?
There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
"Hunter1" wrote in message news:41f428a6$1@funnel.arach.net.au... > Oh christ, the limp-wristed women hating fags are back yet again.... > > > Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com wrote: >> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's >> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to >> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who >> will listen. >> >
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:15:40 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their > marriages.
People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves have to take the first step down that path.
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | Citrus Juice | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:25:42 +1030 |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f4301c$0$20754$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > Nomen Nescio wrote: > >> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and >> their marriages. > > People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to > domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not > represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves > have to take the first step down that path. > > Sylvia.
Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report. Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:24:19 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Citrus Juice wrote:
>>People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to >>domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not >>represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves >>have to take the first step down that path. >> >>Sylvia. > > > Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report.
Though doing so other than in good faith is good for up to 6 months in gaol.
> Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the > jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying > stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.
OK, let's look at the law. We're obviously talking about this act:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/caypa1999242/
And in particular, part 7.3, which relates to care and protection orders. How should this law be altered to make it less stupid and damaging?
Sylvia
|
|
 | | From: | Hunter1 | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800 |
|
|
 | Nomen Nescio wrote: > How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again? > You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.
Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with men with your limpid tiny cock.
I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself?
> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against > women.
Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos.
> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their > marriages.
Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify murder of wives) have told us that and more.
> Have a problem with this?
Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all.
> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:44:01 +1100 |
|
|
 | Well said Hunter1.. Couldn't agree more with your entire assessment here.
Andy
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800, Hunter1 wrote:
>Nomen Nescio wrote: >> How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again? >> You won just one case, but we are going to appeal. > > >Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women >I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with >men with your limpid tiny cock. > >I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even >being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and >why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look >like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself? > > >> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against >> women. > > >Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are >indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos. > > >> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their >> marriages. > > >Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even >remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly >that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify >murder of wives) have told us that and more. > > >> Have a problem with this? > > >Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all. > > >> There are more of us every day and we have a political party. > > >What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't >think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
|
|
 | | From: | Citrus Juice | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:29:51 +1030 |
|
|
 | POOFTER SUPPORTING POOFTER :) The joke of the day.
"Andy" wrote in message news:sid8v0ddojumdrgb1ool4vsss75tek0jk8@4ax.com... > Well said Hunter1.. Couldn't agree more with your entire assessment > here. > > Andy > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800, Hunter1 > wrote: > >>Nomen Nescio wrote: >>> How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again? >>> You won just one case, but we are going to appeal. >> >> >>Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women >>I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with >>men with your limpid tiny cock. >> >>I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even >>being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and >>why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look >>like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself? >> >> >>> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not >>> against >>> women. >> >> >>Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are >>indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos. >> >> >>> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and >>> their >>> marriages. >> >> >>Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even >>remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly >>that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify >>murder of wives) have told us that and more. >> >> >>> Have a problem with this? >> >> >>Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all. >> >> >>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party. >> >> >>What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't >>think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns. >
|
|
 | | From: | Citrus Juice | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:29:13 +1030 |
|
|
 | "Hunter1" wrote in message news:41f435dc@funnel.arach.net.au... > Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >> There are more of us every day and we have a political party. > Family First is the name. > > What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't think > the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
Check last elections. Your days of Australia dominated by poofs and other ual and mental perverts are over. Family will be honoured again.
|
|
 | | From: | Kevin V. Russell | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:24:53 GMT |
|
|
 | wrote in message news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's > usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to > get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who > will listen. Applause. For taking a life?
You are one sick little puppy.
Can you get some help. >
|
|
 | | From: | Nomen Nescio | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:02:56 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au... > > wrote in message > news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's >> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to >> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who >> will listen. > Applause. For taking a life? > > You are one sick little puppy. > > Can you get some help. >> > >
We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their marriages.
Have a problem with this?
There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
"The pay for sin is death" (The Bible).
Do you Kevin have a problem with the Bible?
Applause to brave man who correct injustice made to him.
We need more like this to replace immoral guys like you in ADFA and teach our boys what is real manhood.
|
|
 | | From: | Chasing Kate | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:19:59 +1030 |
|
|
 | Nomen Nescio wrote:
< snip >
Do you realise the Bible is full of fiction
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:12:44 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Chasing Kate" wrote in message news:41F4B6B7.34EE1443@internode.on.net... > Nomen Nescio wrote: > > > < snip > > > Do you realise the Bible is full of fiction > > Our life too. For example, big discussion today about Beazley third time candidate for PM. Plain fiction here is that we do not elect politicians. So the Bible is reflection of real life.
Here is the real procedure of election:
"At the same time, Weishaupt ordered Illuminists to infiltrate into the Lodges of "Blue Masonry" and formed their own secret societies within all secret societies. Only Masons who proved themselves internationalists and those whose conduct proved they had defected from God were initiated into the Illuminati. Thenceforth; the conspirators donned the cloak of philanthropy and humanitarianism to conceal their revolutionary and subversive activities."
Betrayal of the Brotherhood is the worst crime possible in the eyes of its members and is ultimately punishable by death. The Brotherhood is all powerful: all top level members of the police and military forces around the world are placed there through the Brotherhood as Brotherhood tools. Judges and lawyers, media moguls, businessmen and politicians are recruited so that no member of the Brotherhood elite is ever in danger of being held accountable by the System for any crime or misdemeanour. The Brotherhood can, and quite literally does, get away with murder because it is also the law which opposes it. If a non-Brotherhood member should slip through the net and achieve high status then there are ways to ensure that such people are unable to achieve their full potential. For example, I doubt if Prince Charles will ever fulfil his right of kingship as he has publicly refused to enrol with the Freemasons. It infiltrates every area of our society at all levels, but at the top, in the highest social and monetary bracket, the Brotherhood prevails almost in total. It is the single largest vehicle for the perpetuation of the Luciferic consciousness on Earth.
One of the ways by which the faithfulness of members is ensured, especially in the higher levels is by the insistence that the initiated give details of their most intimate secrets to the organisation, so that if any transgression of the rules were to occur then this information would be revealed and used to publicly destroy the individual concerned. As an example of this, one Masonic branch, the Skull and Bones Society, centred around the Harvard and Yale universities, was founded on opium money, is blatantly racist, has some particularly bizarre rituals including an initiation which includes lying in a coffin with a ribbon tied around the genitalia whilst masturbating and shouting out one's greatest ual fantasies. It boasts amongst its members (who, remember, swear complete allegiance to the society above all other commitments) George Bush, Percy Rockefeller, Winston Lord (one time CFR chairman) and nine members of the board of the Morgan Guaranty Trust (see House of Rothschild).
Also associated with Freemasonry within the Elite's own hierarchy are other esoteric societies such as the Grand Orient Lodges, the Knights of Malta, the Knights Templar, P2 and the Black Nobility.
The Brotherhood owns the law, they own the military, they own the oil companies, pharmaceutical companies and just about everything which provides fuel for the status quo. It sets the standards for education, it sets the curriculum, it plants seeds via the media and education systems of what will later become, through tender nurturing, power hungry, dis-satisfied, spiritually unaware slaves to their System. If it was not so sinister it would be purely perfect in its all encompassing design.
While the first three degree Masons and Round Table members are raising money for charity and enjoying relatively harmless social events, their superiors in the Craft are organising wars, drug pushing, co-ordinating assassinations, mind-control, raping and murdering young children in Satanic abuse and formulating plans for world domination.
History has convinced me that it is possible to get away with virtually any crime as long as it is on a large enough scale.
The U.S. presidents, also thirty-third degree Masons, are financed into the position not as leaders of men but as a tool of the Brotherhood. All allegiance come secondary to the bonds within their secret society, on pain of death. Political systems are also a front for the Brotherhood elite. Not as representatives of the people, elected by the people, for the people, but as tools of and for the Brotherhood. Science is controlled to the benefit of the elite, wars are created and manipulated to the benefit of the elite. Every time a bomb is dropped or a tank built, ultimately it is the multi-national businesses who profit, especially the oil industries and world bankers. All is Brotherhood controlled. The scale of the manipulation in all areas of the status quo is almost immeasurable and for this reason virtually unbelievable to most prisoners of the System.
|
|
 | | From: | Elsa Sylvan | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:15:26 +1100 |
|
|
 | Well said! Return men where they belong. Enough discrimination planned by masons and realised by homouals ! Women who are straight has rights and they DO NOT support lesbians.
"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message news:35iopaF4o9011U1@individual.net... > > "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message > news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au... >> >> wrote in message >> news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's >>> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to >>> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who >>> will listen. >> Applause. For taking a life? >> >> You are one sick little puppy. >> >> Can you get some help. >>> >> >> > > We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their > marriages. > > Have a problem with this? > > There are more of us every day and we have a political party. > > "The pay for sin is death" (The Bible). > > Do you Kevin have a problem with the Bible? > > Applause to brave man who correct injustice made to him. > > We need more like this to replace immoral guys like you in ADFA and teach > our boys what is real manhood. >
|
|
 | | From: | Citrus Juice | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:46:06 +1030 |
|
|
 | "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au... > > wrote in message > news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's >> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to >> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who >> will listen. > Applause. For taking a life? >
Why do you think that killing 7 straight men every day in Australia through psychologically developed methods in legal system is good and killing jus ONE SINGLE woman is not?
Are you hypocrite, poofter or mentally ill or without any logic?
> You are one sick little puppy. >
He is not. He fight for justice for men. You fight for immorality and murdering of men.
> Can you get some help. >>
Can you stop posting your crap? It will help to every married woman, man and their children.
If you do, thank you in the name of human rights and natural need for people to have stabile family life and security without government control-freaks interventions.
What God put together should stay together....even if you don't believe in God.
|
|
 | | From: | Charles L | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:05:26 GMT |
|
|
 | "Anonymous" wrote in message news:35efsjF4lrj4cU1@individual.net... > From the Australian TV news today: > > 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for > that. > > House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's > superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through legal > system, > > 3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing a > man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!! >
Yeah, it's ******* disgrace!!
Charles L
|
|
 | | From: | Sylvia Else | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:08:33 +1100 |
|
|
 |
Anonymous wrote:
> Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.
Did the legal system change this year?
Sylvia.
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:18:15 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Sylvia Else" wrote in message news:41f22621$0$4404$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > > Anonymous wrote: > >> Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year. > > Did the legal system change this year? >
Why you ask only for last year? Increase one year before was 40%.
It raise constantly 2 figures each year from the time of introduction of Family Violence Intervention Program in the ACT.
|
|
 | | From: | Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 02:32:53 -0800 |
|
|
 | Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who will listen.
|
|
 | | From: | den20 | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:32:25 +1100 |
|
|
 | well the law is the law. sometimes its an ass, sometimes it serves justice. as for the increase in canberran suicides, didnt know, but dont care much either. if a person chooses to commit suicide that is their choice. there is always help available out there if people choose to accept it. having lived next door to a suicidal neighbor, he was like a yo-yo, up one minute, down the next and always blaming everyone but himself. i decided the best thing to do was ignore him as he was after someone to save him, and frankly i dont believe in that. mind you, based on what you wrote, any reasons behind the increase? i mean here in nsw has there been an increase has there?
Anonymous Wrote: > From the Australian TV news today: > > 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence > for > that. > > House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's > superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through > legal > system, > > 3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing > a > man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!! > > What a shit bigoted country !!!! > > Cat is alive with only broken leg, 7 men die every day from the > Government > enforced suicide. > > Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year. > > Where is God or human justice to wipe out judiciary and other bigoted > idiots > from this country cursed by fatherless children? > > ACT legislative assembly = MURDERERS !!! > > Thank you brainless poofs and lesbians sitting in the ACT legal > institutions > !!!
-- den20
|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:26:21 -0000 |
|
|
|
|