newsgroups-index (beta)

Current group: aus.legal.

3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS

3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Kevin V. Russell
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Chasing Kate
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Candle
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
regn.pickford
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Kevin V. Russell
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Jacques Guy
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Chasing Kate
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Jacques Guy
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Chasing Kate
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Nomen Nescio
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Kevin V. Russell
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Nomen Nescio
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
regn.pickford
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Heretic
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
RT
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
ROUNDTABLE
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
regn.pickford
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Hunter1
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Nomen Nescio
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Citrus Juice
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Hunter1
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Andy
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Citrus Juice
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Citrus Juice
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Kevin V. Russell
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Nomen Nescio
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Chasing Kate
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Elsa Sylvan
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Citrus Juice
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Charles L
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
den20
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Anonymous
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
den20
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
den20
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
den20
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Dean T
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
israel t
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
ant
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Flange
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Sylvia Else
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
bernxard at yahoo.com.au
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
regn.pickford
 Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS  
Darkfalz
From:Anonymous
Subject:3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:05:20 -0600
From the Australian TV news today:

3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for
that.

House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's
superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through legal
system,

3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing a
man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!!

What a shit bigoted country !!!!

Cat is alive with only broken leg, 7 men die every day from the Government
enforced suicide.

Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.

Where is God or human justice to wipe out judiciary and other bigoted idiots
from this country cursed by fatherless children?

ACT legislative assembly = MURDERERS !!!

Thank you brainless poofs and lesbians sitting in the ACT legal institutions
!!!
From:Darkfalz
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:22 Jan 2005 04:25:02 -0800
The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives
issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on
the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about
battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The
guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out.
If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place.
LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect
the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she
should be taken away as well.

MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:16:45 GMT
Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com writes:

> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
> usually their fault relationships fail

Rubbish.

I know several men whose relationships failed because of
substance abuse, violence or marital infidelity.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:18:42 -0000

"israel t" wrote in message
news:87sm4sz90q.fsf@kafka.homenet...
> Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com writes:
>
>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
>> usually their fault relationships fail
>
> Rubbish.
>
> I know several men whose relationships failed because of
> substance abuse, violence or marital infidelity of wife.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:51:00 GMT
"Elsa Sylvan" writes:

> Because you are an idiot without any sense for other people.

I guess that english is not your first language...
From:Kevin V. Russell
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:24:55 GMT

"Darkfalz" wrote in message
news:1106396702.147387.155310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives
> issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on
> the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about
> battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The
> guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out.
> If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place.
> LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect
> the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she
> should be taken away as well.
>
> MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE.

And the murdering fuckwit who killed his wife because she told him he was a
lousy lay?

What should he get?

>
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:11:46 -0000

"Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message
news:41f30af6$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "Darkfalz" wrote in message
> news:1106396702.147387.155310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> The kids deserved the 3 years but I hear you on that murdering wives
>> issue. I'm sick of that shit going on, murder is murder, if you cry on
>> the stand about abuse and have some nazi feminist "doctor" talk about
>> battered this or that "syndrome" shouldn't be a ticket to freedom. The
>> guy isn't there to defend himself anymore, that's why she took him out.
>> If he can't defend himself then you can't prove the abuse took place.
>> LOCK HER THE FUCK UP. Also they have a big cry about how it will affect
>> the children, well the wife was happy to take away their father, she
>> should be taken away as well.
>>
>> MURDERING BITCHES DESERVE LIFE.
>
> And the murdering fuckwit who killed his wife because she told him he was
> a lousy lay?
>
> What should he get?
>

Medal as Australian of the year.
Until now, only homouals and freemason are Australians of the year and
it's about time to honour one strong man following natural instincts.

By the way, the number of murdered husbands by wife is many times higher
than number of murdered wives.
As far as I remember it is 150 women against more than 3,500 men (poufs like
you are counted as woman).
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:51:52 GMT
"Elsa Sylvan" writes:

> housing is expensive because the most of bricklayers
> were forced to suicide by the courts and wives

LOL !

You are classic !
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:34:22 GMT
Sylvia Else writes:

> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
> domestic violence, separation, and divorce.

True.
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:24 +1100

"israel t" wrote in message
news:87fz0r5iid.fsf@kafka.homenet...
> Sylvia Else writes:
>
>> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
>> domestic violence, separation, and divorce.
>
> True.

L I E !!!
Everyone is affected by prosecution of straight people.
Freedom to act naturally is described in the law as abuse. 50% of Australian
children are now in fatherless family.

Another proof:

Most of men who suicide were immigrants from traditional marriage countries.
They were for example bricklayers. Today, the price of one day of
bricklayers work (420 bricks) is up to $1,200.
This is cash per day - housing is expensive because the most of bricklayers
were forced to suicide by the courts and wives. If you are buying house,
most of us do, you have to pay for court games and conspiracy of men
holocaust in Australia.
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:50:06 +1100


Elsa Sylvan wrote:

> Freedom to act naturally is described in the law as abuse.

Where does the law say that?

> 50% of Australian
> children are now in fatherless family.

Let's see now...

http://tinyurl.com/47mdb

Line 15 - children under 15 in single-parent families, as a percentage
of all children under 15.

The figure is 19.9% for 2003. That includes families with no mothers, so
19.9% is only an upper limit on the number of children in families
without a father. Rather less than the 50% claimed.

BTW, lines 11 and 12 together tell us that 11% of all single parent
families contain a father rather than a mother.

That's the trouble with the ABS - they keep providing that annoying
factual data.

Sylvia.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:37:41 GMT
"Citrus Juice" writes:

>>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>>
> Family First is the name.

Thanks.
I now know who to despise.

Do you think that your taunting of s and others does your
party or your beliefs any good ?

And you are supposed to be a Christian party.

What would your precious Lord say of such behaviour by one of his so called followers.
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:21:32 +1100

"israel t" wrote in message
news:878y6j5icv.fsf@kafka.homenet...
> "Citrus Juice" writes:
>
>>>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>>>
>> Family First is the name.
>
> Thanks.
> I now know who to despise.
>

You despise everyone except yourself.
Because you are an idiot without any sense for other people.
From:Chasing Kate
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:21:28 +1030
bernxard@yahoo.com.au wrote:

> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing
> it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse
> died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun.
>
> Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice?



That is such a stupid argument.

Typical do gooder attitude
From:Candle
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:46:09 +1100
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:21:28 +1030, Chasing Kate wrote:

> bernxard@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>
>> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing
>> it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse
>> died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun.
>>
>> Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice?
>
>
>
> That is such a stupid argument.

What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?
>
> Typical do gooder attitude
From:regn.pickford
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:04:25 GMT

"Anonymous" wrote in message
news:35efsjF4lrj4cU1@individual.net...
> From the Australian TV news today:
>
> 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for
> that.
>

They exhibited healthy natural urges for their youth searching out
some of `lifes lessons'

This media circus is about justifying having big brother recording you
everywhere doing everything.

The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us
did.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:21:59 GMT
>>> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see
>>> them.
>>
>> Rubbish.
>> I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives.
>
> Is this because you are unemployed.or is because in Jewish families there is
> order.

Unfortunately, I am not unemployed.
Unfortunately because I dislike Monday mornings.
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:42:01 +1100


regn.pickford wrote:

> The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us
> did.

Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be
cruel to animals.

Sylvia.
From:Kevin V. Russell
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:22:45 GMT

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> regn.pickford wrote:
>
>> The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of
>> us
>> did.
>
> Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be cruel
> to animals.
>
> Sylvia.

Me neither Sylvia.

The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).
From:Jacques Guy
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:31:18 +1000
Kevin V. Russell wrote:

> The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).

It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:05:14 -0000

"Jacques Guy" wrote in message
news:41F31A86.4D84@alphalink.com.au...
> Kevin V. Russell wrote:
>
>> The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).
>
> It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.

Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see
them. If they try to say something to them and prevent them doing bad things
it is called harassment and they may even go to jail for that,

Our society is totally deviated by stupid control-freaks who are punishing
normal human behaviour and promote sterile society.

The best solution would be IMHO deleting ALL human made laws and go back to
elementary 10 Commandments.

Regarding killing or torturing the cats and other animals - this is the
right given to people by God (according to the Bible, Torah and Koran) and
because more than 80 % of Australians claim they believe to God, kids should
be set free and police judged and punished for restriction of God's given
freedom and harassing children.

We have too much cats and dogs in Australia and the number of animals should
be reduced. Cats kill birds and lizard so it is right that cats may be
killed or tortured on the same way they torture their prey.

BTW the cat tortured was the ugliest I ever seen, and you feel sorry for
her, take it home and hide it from people with good taste.
From:Chasing Kate
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:24:04 +1030
Jacques Guy wrote:

> Kevin V. Russell wrote:
>
> > The twisted little fuckers deserve whatever they get (probably more).
>
> It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.



How so????
From:Jacques Guy
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:15:24 +1000
Chasing Kate wrote:

> > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
>
> How so????

Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up?

The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the
Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??
From:Chasing Kate
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:32:02 +1030
Jacques Guy wrote:

> Chasing Kate wrote:
>
> > > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
> >
> > How so????
>
> Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up?
>
> The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the
> Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??



I agree with you 100%

But with these kids did they even have parents who were
around to give a toss about them?

As for school do we know what they were like there?
No I imagine we don't.... They could have been terrible
little shits for all we know.

You can't lump the raising of kids on a school as
they have enough trouble keeping the little brats
in line in other classes....

This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit.
From:Nomen Nescio
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:26:47 -0000

"Chasing Kate" wrote in message
news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net...
> Jacques Guy wrote:
>
>> Chasing Kate wrote:
>>
>
> This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit.
>

Exactly !!!
THE MARRIAGES ACT


"Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman
to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life"

Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act.

Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations.

All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government.

All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be forced
to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever.

The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged.
From:Kevin V. Russell
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:21:16 GMT

"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
news:35hn14F4nm9ntU1@individual.net...
>
> "Chasing Kate" wrote in message
> news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net...
>> Jacques Guy wrote:
>>
>>> Chasing Kate wrote:
>>>
>>
>> This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit.
>>
>
> Exactly !!!
> THE MARRIAGES ACT
>
>
> "Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a
> woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life"
>
> Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act.

The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does
not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that
are there because YOU put them there.

If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF THEM
by voting them out.

Good luck.
>
> Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations.

No they are not. The Family Law Act was passed by Parliament. It's validity
at law has never been seriously challenged given the Commonwealth has the
consitutional power to pass such laws.
>
> All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government.

What?
>
> All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be
> forced to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever.
What?
>
> The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged.

It was Lionel Murphy you bonehead.
>
>
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:39:17 +1100


Kevin V. Russell wrote:

> The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does
> not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that
> are there because YOU put them there.
>
> If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF THEM
> by voting them out.

Well, that's the theory. In practice, the Government has a lot of
control, because there are all sorts of sanctions (non-promotion to
ministerial positions, disendorsement by the party, etc) that can be
brought to bear on MPs who don't toe the party line.

Add to that factionalisation within the party, and the system's about as
undemocratic as it's possible for a nominally democratic system to be.
The only good thing going for it is that it's better than most of the
other systems in use around the world.

Sylvia.
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:39:36 +0800

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f435a5$0$4095$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> Kevin V. Russell wrote:
>
>> The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government
>> does not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and
>> senators that are there because YOU put them there.
>>
>> If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF
>> THEM by voting them out.
>
> Well, that's the theory. In practice, the Government has a lot of control,
> because there are all sorts of sanctions (non-promotion to ministerial
> positions, disendorsement by the party, etc) that can be brought to bear
> on MPs who don't toe the party line.

True, and we all know that.
So why are we all pretending that our dictatorship is democracy?

>
> Add to that factionalisation within the party, and the system's about as
> undemocratic as it's possible for a nominally democratic system to be. The
> only good thing going for it is that it's better than most of the other
> systems in use around the world.
>

Can you please post some examples of other systems worse than Australian?
I've done my search and Australian legal system is absolute champion in
manipulating elections. Even US Bush can learn some tricks from us.
No legal system in the whole world (and in much more populated countries)
murder 7 men every day for nothing. There were some in the past, but in
today's world Australia is absolute champion in genocide and holocaust
category.
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:58:50 +1100


Elsa Sylvan wrote:

> Can you please post some examples of other systems worse than Australian?
> I've done my search and Australian legal system is absolute champion in
> manipulating elections. Even US Bush can learn some tricks from us.
> No legal system in the whole world (and in much more populated countries)
> murder 7 men every day for nothing. There were some in the past, but in
> today's world Australia is absolute champion in genocide and holocaust
> category.

I was thinking of military dictatorships, that kind thing.

Also, look at the UK's first past the post electoral system that really
does make a vote for a minority party a wasted vote. That has to be less
democratic that Australia's system.

At least we appear to have an honest judiciary who are pretty much
immune to actual or implied threats from the executive Government (which
I suspect is the only reason those threats don't appear).

Sylvia.
From:Nomen Nescio
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:44:10 -0700

"Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message
news:41f3f92b$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
> news:35hn14F4nm9ntU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Chasing Kate" wrote in message
>> news:41F3A04A.B5FAD6F1@internode.on.net...
>>> Jacques Guy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chasing Kate wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> This all begins with the breakdown of the family unit.
>>>
>>
>> Exactly !!!
>> THE MARRIAGES ACT
>>
>>
>> "Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a
>> woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life"
>>
>> Interference with marriage by government is against marriage Act.
>
> The Marriage Act is simply a law passed by Parliament. The Government does
> not control Parliament. It is made up of representatives and senators that
> are there because YOU put them there.
>
> If you don't like what they do then call them to account or GET RID OF
> THEM by voting them out.
>
> Good luck.
>>
>> Hence, Family Court and Child Support Agency are illegal organisations.
>
> No they are not. The Family Law Act was passed by Parliament. It's
> validity at law has never been seriously challenged given the Commonwealth
> has the consitutional power to pass such laws.
>>
>> All decision should be reversed and all damages paid by the government.
>
> What?

Many think it should be: All decisions of Family Court and Child Support
Agency should be reversed to "who is guilty for ending a marriage should pay
all the costs incurred by ending the marriage". If end was caused by an
intruder to marriage and he/she can't pay all damages, former decision
makers (judges or people from CSA) have to reimburse all money or damages
should be paid by the government who put incompetent and immoral judges in
position to destroy families.

Why?
..
BECAUSE BY DEFINITION MARRIAGE IS FOR LIFE (and you and others can think
whatever you and they want, same like I think I should not repay the house
taken from me by the Family Court but I am FORCED to pay because I signed
the contract). This is the base of the law ignored in Australia due to
stupidity and lack of logic of lawmakers. Everything else than forcing the
guilty person(s) causing destroying of functioning elementary unit of
society (which is family consisting of man + woman + ?children) is nothing
else than discrimination and exploitation of innocent by corrupted legal
system, not only to innocent partner in marriage but also to children who
usually suffer (some of them all life) because one of the parents decided to
lie on marriage date and change partner or live brothel style of life.

>>
>> All judges and "family" lawyers causing one or more divorce should be
>> forced to pay damages and prohibited to practice law forever.
> What?
>>
>> The drunkard Hawke who establish satanic Family Court should be hanged.
>
> It was Lionel Murphy you bonehead.
>>

Whoever did it was very sick and immoral person.
Whoever support such stupid idea that anarchy in human relationship is
better than order and decency and try to enforce this should be executed in
the name of justice, humanity and morality. I suggest former Chief Justice
of Family Court who even went step further and decided to change to 14
years old girl should be the first to be hanged.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:06:52 -0000

"Jacques Guy" wrote in message
news:41F34F0C.7DD8@alphalink.com.au...
> Chasing Kate wrote:
>
>> > It's their parents, and teachers, who deserve it.
>>
>> How so????
>
> Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up?
>
> The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the
> Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??

Freemasons amd homouals writing the law?
From:regn.pickford
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:31:29 GMT

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> regn.pickford wrote:
>
> > The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of
us
> > did.
>
> Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be
> cruel to animals.

Maybe you weren't.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:16:54 -0000

"regn.pickford" wrote in message
news:lWLId.130740$K7.77795@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Sylvia Else" wrote in message
> news:41f23c09$0$14675$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>>
>> regn.pickford wrote:
>>
>> > The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of
> us
>> > did.
>>
>> Speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure that I was never inclined to be
>> cruel to animals.
>
> Maybe you weren't.
>
>

Her choice is cruelty against men.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:33:14 GMT
"regn.pickford" writes:

>> 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for
>> that.

The do-gooders ( never thought that I would use that phrase ) will make sure
that the kids get community service.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:33:13 GMT
Candle writes:

>> That is such a stupid argument.
>
> What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?

The fact that they have broken the law.

BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy.
All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the offence.

3 years is the maximum that they can be given.

However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6 kittens,
all they got was a 1000 $ fine.

For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on the hands.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:55:29 -0000

"israel t" wrote in message
news:877jm4r16n.fsf@kafka.homenet...
> Candle writes:
>
>>> That is such a stupid argument.
>>
>> What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?
>
> The fact that they have broken the law.
>
> BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy.
> All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the
> offence.
>
> 3 years is the maximum that they can be given.
>
> However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6
> kittens,
> all they got was a 1000 $ fine.

But this was education for this Iraq prison, isn'y it?

>
> For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on
> the hands.

Just like this woman torturer get while man get 10 years and ungraceful
dismissal.
Discrimination against the men again in practice.
From:Heretic
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:52:26 +1100
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:33:13 +0000, israel t wrote:

> Candle writes:
>
>>> That is such a stupid argument.
>>
>> What is the argument for doing anything at all to these teenagers?
>
> The fact that they have broken the law.

It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break the
law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention?

> BTW, the " 3 years" is a furphy.
> All that has happened so far is that they have been charged with the
> offence.
>
> 3 years is the maximum that they can be given.
>
> However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6
> kittens, all they got was a 1000 $ fine.
>
> For hurting one kitten ( who survived ) they will get a virtual smack on
> the hands.

If so, that is the consequence of them having broken the law. You
obviously want more. What is the argument for doing anything at all to
these teenagers?
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:49:58 +1100


Heretic wrote:

> It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break the
> law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention?

Maybe there's something particularly repugnant about crimes which
involve needless and pointless infliction of suffering on a creature
that has no way of defending itself.

There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be
limited to animals.

Sylvia.
From:RT
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:30:08 +1000

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f37347$0$2195$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> Heretic wrote:
>
>> It's not a fact until a court says so. But, in any case, people break
>> the
>> law all the time. Why does this case attract any attention?

> Maybe there's something particularly repugnant about crimes which involve
> needless and pointless infliction of suffering on a creature that has no
> way of defending itself.

You got it


> There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be
> limited to animals.
>
> Sylvia.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:30:32 GMT
Chasing Kate writes:

>> I've seen a cat torment a mouse by repeatedly catching and releasing
>> it, batting it with its paws, carryining it in its mouth. The mouse
>> died of a heart attack. The little shits will cach birds for fun.
>>
>> Should we punish a child for doing what cats do to mice?
>
> That is such a stupid argument.
> Typical do gooder attitude

I have seen a tree fall on a person and kill them.

So why should we punish murderers when they are only doing what trees do to people ?
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:15:17 GMT
"Anonymous" writes:

>> However, as we know, when soldiers in Townsville tortured and killed 6
>> kittens,
>> all they got was a 1000 $ fine.
> But this was education for this Iraq prison, isn'y it?

True.

Perhaps their lawyer should have used," Just training to torture the
Iraquis " as their defence.

They would have got off scot free without even a fine.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:13:12 GMT
Sylvia Else writes:

> There is also an inevitable suspicion that their behaviour wouldn't be
> limited to animals.

There have been studies linking extreme cruelty to animals
( not just tugging on a cat's tail ) to future criminal behaviour.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:23:44 GMT
"Anonymous" writes:

> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see
> them.

Rubbish.
I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:16:10 -0000

"israel t" wrote in message
news:87oefgz8p3.fsf@kafka.homenet...
> "Anonymous" writes:
>
>> Parents in modern world have no control over children as they hardly see
>> them.
>
> Rubbish.
> I have two teens and I still have significant input into their lives.

Is this because you are unemployed.or is because in Jewish families there is
order. Father is the God's representative in the house.

In modern Australian parenting, there is no respect for father. Result is
chaos.
From:ROUNDTABLE
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:14:40 GMT
You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably
lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain
dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the
world due to your stupidity or go to jail.

"regn.pickford" wrote in message
news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

: The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of us
: did.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:42:49 +1100

"ROUNDTABLE" wrote in message
news:41f36aff$1@news.comindico.com.au...
> You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably
> lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain
> dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the
> world due to your stupidity or go to jail.

At least he is not a top-poster like you.

>
> "regn.pickford" wrote in message
> news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> : The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of
> us
> : did.
> :
> :
> :
> :
> :
> :
> :
> :
>
>
From:regn.pickford
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:10:53 GMT

"ROUNDTABLE" wrote in message
news:41f36aff$1@news.comindico.com.au...
> You didn't grow out of it. You probably smoke, drink alcohol, are probably
> lazy and don't read much. Instead what happened is that you became brain
> dead. Those kids can either become like you - a half dead person in the
> world due to your stupidity or go to jail.
>
> "regn.pickford" wrote in message
> news:ZqqId.129299$K7.79973@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> : The kids did `bad', so what? They'll likely grow out of it, the rest of
us
> : did.

Please avoid top posting as it is annoying.
From:israel t
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:24:54 GMT
"Anonymous" writes:

>> Who is responsible for how the brats are brought up?
>>
>> The brats, their parents, their teachers, or the
>> Holy Virgin, Koffi Anan, or the Dalai Lama??
>
> Freemasons amd homouals writing the law?

And what happened to parental responsibility ?
Off in ga-ga-land with delusions of persecution ?
From:Darkfalz
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:23 Jan 2005 04:33:07 -0800
It's a midday movie industry, this husband killing business.
From:Darkfalz
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:23 Jan 2005 04:21:31 -0800
Yes it is. :-(

She has destroyed so many innocent lives.
From:Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:23 Jan 2005 02:08:38 -0800
Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
will listen.
From:Hunter1
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:45:47 +0800
Oh christ, the limp-wristed women hating fags are back yet again....


Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com wrote:
> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
> will listen.
>
From:Nomen Nescio
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:00:41 -0700
Oh Christ, the limp-wristed men hating fags are back yet again....

How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again?
You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.

BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against
women.

We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
marriages.

Have a problem with this?

There are more of us every day and we have a political party.


"Hunter1" wrote in message
news:41f428a6$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
> Oh christ, the limp-wristed women hating fags are back yet again....
>
>
> Darkfalz.Usenet@gmail.com wrote:
>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
>> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
>> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
>> will listen.
>>
>
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:15:40 +1100


Nomen Nescio wrote:

> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
> marriages.

People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not
represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple
themselves have to take the first step down that path.

Sylvia.
From:Citrus Juice
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:25:42 +1030

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f4301c$0$20754$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and
>> their marriages.
>
> People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
> domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not
> represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves
> have to take the first step down that path.
>
> Sylvia.

Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report.
Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the
jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying
stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:24:19 +1100


Citrus Juice wrote:

>>People with functional marriages are not affected by laws relating to
>>domestic violence, separation, and divorce. The law may or may not
>>represent the best outcome once things go sour, but the couple themselves
>>have to take the first step down that path.
>>
>>Sylvia.
>
>
> Not true. Anyone can call publicly available toll free numbers and report.

Though doing so other than in good faith is good for up to 6 months in gaol.

> Many children were stolen by government, many men arrested and put in the
> jail and that was in many cases the first step (done by government applying
> stupid and damaging law) toward divorce.

OK, let's look at the law. We're obviously talking about this act:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/caypa1999242/

And in particular, part 7.3, which relates to care and protection
orders. How should this law be altered to make it less stupid and damaging?

Sylvia
From:Hunter1
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again?
> You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.


Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women
I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with
men with your limpid tiny cock.

I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even
being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and
why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look
like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself?


> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against
> women.


Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are
indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos.


> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
> marriages.


Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even
remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly
that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify
murder of wives) have told us that and more.


> Have a problem with this?


Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all.


> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.


What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't
think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
From:Andy
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:44:01 +1100
Well said Hunter1.. Couldn't agree more with your entire assessment
here.

Andy

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800, Hunter1
wrote:

>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again?
>> You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.
>
>
>Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women
>I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with
>men with your limpid tiny cock.
>
>I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even
>being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and
>why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look
>like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself?
>
>
>> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not against
>> women.
>
>
>Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are
>indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos.
>
>
>> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
>> marriages.
>
>
>Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even
>remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly
>that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify
>murder of wives) have told us that and more.
>
>
>> Have a problem with this?
>
>
>Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all.
>
>
>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>
>
>What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't
>think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
From:Citrus Juice
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:29:51 +1030
POOFTER SUPPORTING POOFTER :)
The joke of the day.

"Andy" wrote in message
news:sid8v0ddojumdrgb1ool4vsss75tek0jk8@4ax.com...
> Well said Hunter1.. Couldn't agree more with your entire assessment
> here.
>
> Andy
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:42:08 +0800, Hunter1
> wrote:
>
>>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>> How are you Garry? Promoting homouals again?
>>> You won just one case, but we are going to appeal.
>>
>>
>>Why are you going to court as a homoual Garry? Because you hate women
>>I imagine, you're so afraid of them that you are only willing to go with
>>men with your limpid tiny cock.
>>
>>I'm guessing that this deep seated shame that you have about not even
>>being half a man is why you turn and run when-ever you see a woman, and
>>why you keep changing ID in Usenet in a pathetic attempt to make it look
>>like there is actually more than one of you agreeing with yourself?
>>
>>
>>> BTW Christ should be with capital C and we are PRO FAMILY and not
>>> against
>>> women.
>>
>>
>>Couldn't give a fuck how you think I should spell christ, and you are
>>indeed a woman hating fag as are your other alter-egos.
>>
>>
>>> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and
>>> their
>>> marriages.
>>
>>
>>Bullshit, you want women to be subservient slaves, any woman that even
>>remotely wants to exercise any form of free-will scares you so badly
>>that you turn fag. Plenty of your posts (such as those that glorify
>>murder of wives) have told us that and more.
>>
>>
>>> Have a problem with this?
>>
>>
>>Other than it all being lies from a woman-hating fag, not at all.
>>
>>
>>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>>
>>
>>What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't
>>think the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.
>
From:Citrus Juice
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:29:13 +1030

"Hunter1" wrote in message
news:41f435dc@funnel.arach.net.au...
> Nomen Nescio wrote:

>
>> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>
Family First is the name.
>
> What? The "Pathetic Wife Murdering Poofter Coward Party"???? I don't think
> the PWMPCP will be getting many votes you clowns.

Check last elections. Your days of Australia dominated by poofs and other
ual and mental perverts are over.
Family will be honoured again.
From:Kevin V. Russell
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:24:53 GMT

wrote in message
news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
> will listen.
Applause. For taking a life?

You are one sick little puppy.

Can you get some help.
>
From:Nomen Nescio
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:02:56 -0700

"Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message
news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> wrote in message
> news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
>> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
>> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
>> will listen.
> Applause. For taking a life?
>
> You are one sick little puppy.
>
> Can you get some help.
>>
>
>

We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
marriages.

Have a problem with this?

There are more of us every day and we have a political party.

"The pay for sin is death" (The Bible).

Do you Kevin have a problem with the Bible?

Applause to brave man who correct injustice made to him.

We need more like this to replace immoral guys like you in ADFA and teach
our boys what is real manhood.
From:Chasing Kate
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:19:59 +1030
Nomen Nescio wrote:


< snip >

Do you realise the Bible is full of fiction
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:12:44 +1100

"Chasing Kate" wrote in message
news:41F4B6B7.34EE1443@internode.on.net...
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>
> < snip >
>
> Do you realise the Bible is full of fiction
>
>
Our life too. For example, big discussion today about Beazley third time
candidate for PM.
Plain fiction here is that we do not elect politicians. So the Bible is
reflection of real life.

Here is the real procedure of election:

"At the same time, Weishaupt ordered Illuminists to infiltrate into the
Lodges of "Blue Masonry" and formed their own secret societies within
all secret societies. Only Masons who proved themselves
internationalists and those whose conduct proved they had defected from
God were initiated into the Illuminati. Thenceforth; the conspirators
donned the cloak of philanthropy and humanitarianism to conceal their
revolutionary and subversive activities."

Betrayal of the Brotherhood is the worst crime possible in the eyes of
its members and is ultimately punishable by death. The Brotherhood is
all powerful: all top level members of the police and military forces
around the world are placed there through the Brotherhood as
Brotherhood tools. Judges and lawyers, media moguls, businessmen and
politicians are recruited so that no member of the Brotherhood elite is
ever in danger of being held accountable by the System for any crime or
misdemeanour. The Brotherhood can, and quite literally does, get away
with murder because it is also the law which opposes it. If a
non-Brotherhood member should slip through the net and achieve high
status then there are ways to ensure that such people are unable to
achieve their full potential. For example, I doubt if Prince Charles
will ever fulfil his right of kingship as he has publicly refused to
enrol with the Freemasons. It infiltrates every area of our society at
all levels, but at the top, in the highest social and monetary bracket,
the Brotherhood prevails almost in total. It is the single largest
vehicle for the perpetuation of the Luciferic consciousness on Earth.

One of the ways by which the faithfulness of members is ensured,
especially in the higher levels is by the insistence that the initiated
give details of their most intimate secrets to the organisation, so
that if any transgression of the rules were to occur then this
information would be revealed and used to publicly destroy the
individual concerned. As an example of this, one Masonic branch, the
Skull and Bones Society, centred around the Harvard and Yale
universities, was founded on opium money, is blatantly racist, has some
particularly bizarre rituals including an initiation which includes
lying in a coffin with a ribbon tied around the genitalia whilst
masturbating and shouting out one's greatest ual fantasies. It
boasts amongst its members (who, remember, swear complete allegiance to
the society above all other commitments) George Bush, Percy
Rockefeller, Winston Lord (one time CFR chairman) and nine members of
the board of the Morgan Guaranty Trust (see House of Rothschild).

Also associated with Freemasonry within the Elite's own hierarchy are
other esoteric societies such as the Grand Orient Lodges, the Knights
of Malta, the Knights Templar, P2 and the Black Nobility.

The Brotherhood owns the law, they own the military, they own the oil
companies, pharmaceutical companies and just about everything which
provides fuel for the status quo. It sets the standards for education,
it sets the curriculum, it plants seeds via the media and education
systems of what will later become, through tender nurturing, power
hungry, dis-satisfied, spiritually unaware slaves to their System. If
it was not so sinister it would be purely perfect in its all
encompassing design.

While the first three degree Masons and Round Table members are raising
money for charity and enjoying relatively harmless social events, their
superiors in the Craft are organising wars, drug pushing, co-ordinating
assassinations, mind-control, raping and murdering young children in
Satanic abuse and formulating plans for world domination.

History has convinced me that it is possible to get away with virtually
any crime as long as it is on a large enough scale.

The U.S. presidents, also thirty-third degree Masons, are financed into
the position not as leaders of men but as a tool of the Brotherhood.
All allegiance come secondary to the bonds within their secret society,
on pain of death. Political systems are also a front for the
Brotherhood elite. Not as representatives of the people, elected by the
people, for the people, but as tools of and for the Brotherhood.
Science is controlled to the benefit of the elite, wars are created and
manipulated to the benefit of the elite. Every time a bomb is dropped
or a tank built, ultimately it is the multi-national businesses who
profit, especially the oil industries and world bankers. All is
Brotherhood controlled. The scale of the manipulation in all areas of
the status quo is almost immeasurable and for this reason virtually
unbelievable to most prisoners of the System.
From:Elsa Sylvan
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:15:26 +1100
Well said!
Return men where they belong.
Enough discrimination planned by masons and realised by homouals !
Women who are straight has rights and they DO NOT support lesbians.


"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
news:35iopaF4o9011U1@individual.net...
>
> "Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message
> news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>>
>> wrote in message
>> news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
>>> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
>>> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
>>> will listen.
>> Applause. For taking a life?
>>
>> You are one sick little puppy.
>>
>> Can you get some help.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> We would like to protect decent married women and their children and their
> marriages.
>
> Have a problem with this?
>
> There are more of us every day and we have a political party.
>
> "The pay for sin is death" (The Bible).
>
> Do you Kevin have a problem with the Bible?
>
> Applause to brave man who correct injustice made to him.
>
> We need more like this to replace immoral guys like you in ADFA and teach
> our boys what is real manhood.
>
From:Citrus Juice
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:46:06 +1030

"Kevin V. Russell" wrote in message
news:41f3fa04$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> wrote in message
> news:1106467176.762093.24560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
>> usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
>> get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
>> will listen.
> Applause. For taking a life?
>

Why do you think that killing 7 straight men every day in Australia through
psychologically developed methods in legal system is good and killing jus
ONE SINGLE woman is not?

Are you hypocrite, poofter or mentally ill or without any logic?

> You are one sick little puppy.
>

He is not. He fight for justice for men.
You fight for immorality and murdering of men.

> Can you get some help.
>>

Can you stop posting your crap?
It will help to every married woman, man and their children.

If you do, thank you in the name of human rights and natural need for
people to have stabile family life and security without government
control-freaks interventions.

What God put together should stay together....even if you don't believe in
God.
From:Charles L
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:05:26 GMT

"Anonymous" wrote in message
news:35efsjF4lrj4cU1@individual.net...
> From the Australian TV news today:
>
> 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence for
> that.
>
> House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's
> superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through
legal
> system,
>
> 3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing a
> man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!!
>

Yeah, it's ******* disgrace!!

Charles L
From:Sylvia Else
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:08:33 +1100


Anonymous wrote:

> Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.

Did the legal system change this year?

Sylvia.
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:18:15 -0000

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:41f22621$0$4404$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> Anonymous wrote:
>
>> Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.
>
> Did the legal system change this year?
>

Why you ask only for last year?
Increase one year before was 40%.

It raise constantly 2 figures each year from the time of introduction of
Family Violence Intervention Program in the ACT.
From:Darkfalz.Usenet at gmail.com
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:23 Jan 2005 02:32:53 -0800
Applause. Where do women get off saying shit like this these days? It's
usually their fault relationships fail, and then THEY are the ones to
get spiteful and spill all the secrets of their life to anyone who
will listen.
From:den20
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:32:25 +1100

well the law is the law. sometimes its an ass, sometimes it serves
justice. as for the increase in canberran suicides, didnt know, but
dont care much either. if a person chooses to commit suicide that is
their choice. there is always help available out there if people choose
to accept it. having lived next door to a suicidal neighbor, he was
like a yo-yo, up one minute, down the next and always blaming everyone
but himself. i decided the best thing to do was ignore him as he was
after someone to save him, and frankly i dont believe in that. mind
you, based on what you wrote, any reasons behind the increase? i mean
here in nsw has there been an increase has there?


Anonymous Wrote:
> From the Australian TV news today:
>
> 3 teenagers in Sydney tortured a cat. There is 3 years jail sentence
> for
> that.
>
> House, all what is in, cars, family savings, children, husband's
> superannuation and NO JAIL but praising for murdering husband through
> legal
> system,
>
> 3 years in jail for breaking the leg of feral cat, nothing for killing
> a
> man - WHAT A PATHETIC HYPOCRISY OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM !!!!
>
> What a shit bigoted country !!!!
>
> Cat is alive with only broken leg, 7 men die every day from the
> Government
> enforced suicide.
>
> Also in news today: Suicides in Canberra increased 80% this year.
>
> Where is God or human justice to wipe out judiciary and other bigoted
> idiots
> from this country cursed by fatherless children?
>
> ACT legislative assembly = MURDERERS !!!
>
> Thank you brainless poofs and lesbians sitting in the ACT legal
> institutions
> !!!


--
den20
From:Anonymous
Subject:Re: 3 YEARS FOR TORTURING THE CAT FOR TEENAGERS
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:26:21 -0000