Since I'm not allowed to address the local goofball directly, would
someone please inform Phil of the following facts regarding these
posts:

> Take the Mercury Living Presence series. Some of the best recordings
> of all time.

"** Hisssss, sizzle, snap, crackle, pop , hissss, sizzle,
rumble,
rumble, rumble, hiss , crackle pop ....."

I said "recordings", not pressings. Clearly Phil does not know the
difference. Would someone please enlighten him?

> For the record I've never heard the slightest difference between
> minidiscs. That's a wank. I've never heard the slightest difference
> between interconnects. That's a wank. I HAVE heard a big difference
> after damping the top plate of a Marantz CD player.

"** Through headphones ??"

Yes, through heaphones. Would someone please inform Phil that good
headphones are more revealing than good speakers for several very
obvious reasons. Clearly Phil is only familiar with the $2 bargain
store variety.

Thank you.

From:	Ayn Marx
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	22 Jan 2005 01:19:36 -0800

paul packer wrote:
Snip<............
>> That's a wank. I HAVE heard a big difference
> > after damping the top plate of a Marantz CD player.
>
>
> "** Through headphones ??"
>
> Yes, through heaphones. Would someone please inform Phil that good
> headphones are more revealing than good speakers for several very
> obvious reasons. Clearly Phil is only familiar with the $2 bargain
> store variety.

No luv, it's not the $2 bargain cans, it's the shape of his
head..........................

From:	Ilikeradios at butiknowlittle.com
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:25:17 +1100

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:38:42 GMT, packer@iprimus.com.au (paul packer)
wrote:

>
>Yes, through heaphones. Would someone please inform Phil that good
>headphones are more revealing than good speakers for several very
>obvious reasons. Clearly Phil is only familiar with the $2 bargain
>store variety.
>
>Thank you.

Phil used to have a very expensive set of headphones, but they
wouldn't fit on his head.
The model number was something like Extra Super Large.

From:	Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:26:06 +0800

wrote in message
news:mbs3v0lrom9l5i4d36568tojqd834qhl37@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:38:42 GMT, packer@iprimus.com.au (paul packer)
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Yes, through heaphones. Would someone please inform Phil that good
> >headphones are more revealing than good speakers for several very
> >obvious reasons. Clearly Phil is only familiar with the $2 bargain
> >store variety.
> >
> >Thank you.
>
> Phil used to have a very expensive set of headphones, but they
> wouldn't fit on his head.
> The model number was something like Extra Super Large.

You are correct. Phil had two sets of electrostatic headphones. Quad
ESL57s which were later replaced by a Quad ESL63s. Unfortunately he broke
the latter model and returned them to the dealer for a refund. Both models
were so big he had to lay on the floor to use them. Since then he has
acquired a self assembly kit set from the $2 shop.

Cheers,
Alan

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:20:03 +1100

"Alan Rutlidge .

** How is your little mate Dean tonight??

Gone cold on being your sockpuppet ??

............. Phil

From:	Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:32:47 +0800

"Phil Allison" wrote in message
news:35er78F4k7hjaU1@individual.net...
>
> "Alan Rutlidge .
>
>
>
> ** How is your little mate Dean tonight??
>
> Gone cold on being your sockpuppet ??
>
>
>
>
>
> ............ Phil
>

How am I supposed to know?

You reckon you've got all the answers.

Cheers,
Alan

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:42:43 +1100

"Alan Rutlidge
> "Phil Allison"
>>
>>
>> ** How is your little mate Dean tonight??
>>
>> Gone cold on being your sockpuppet ??
>
>> ............ Phil
>>
>
> How am I supposed to know?
>

** But he is your best mate.

............... Phil

From:	Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:54:16 +0800

"Phil Allison" wrote in message
news:35f3ilF4lq899U1@individual.net...
>
> "Alan Rutlidge
> > "Phil Allison"
> >>
> >>
> >> ** How is your little mate Dean tonight??
> >>
> >> Gone cold on being your sockpuppet ??
> >
> >> ............ Phil
> >>
> >
> > How am I supposed to know?
> >
>
>
> ** But he is your best mate.
>
>
>
>
>
> ............... Phil
>
>

How can that possibly be? Agreeing with a comment or two in some of his
posts can't possibly constitute "mateship" can it? Mind you, I don't think
you have any mates, so anyone that agrees with you is at least temporarily
your mate I guess in your estimation????

Cheers,
Alan

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Correcting Phil by proxy.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:56:58 +1100

"Alan Rutlidge
> "Phil Allison"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ** How is your little mate Dean tonight??
>> >>
>> >> Gone cold on being your sockpuppet ??
>> >>
>> >
>> > How am I supposed to know?
>> >
>>
>> ** But he is your best mate.
>>
>
> How can that possibly be?

** You two have so many things in common.

> Agreeing with a comment or two in some of his
> posts can't possibly constitute "mateship" can it?

** You are being so "coy" about this.

................ Phil

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:10:40 +1100

"paul packer"
>
>> Take the Mercury Living Presence series. Some of the best recordings
>> of all time.
>
> "** Hisssss, sizzle, snap, crackle, pop , hissss, sizzle,
> rumble, rumble, rumble, hiss , crackle pop ....."
>
> I said "recordings", not pressings.

** The words are synonyms - you pathetic, collecting FUCKWIT

>> For the record I've never heard the slightest difference between
>> minidiscs. That's a wank. I've never heard the slightest difference
>> between interconnects. That's a wank. I HAVE heard a big difference
>> after damping the top plate of a Marantz CD player.
>
>
> "** Through headphones ??"
>
> Yes, through heaphones.

** Then you are a total fucking maniac.

Speakers just might vibrate a metal panel - but never phones.

................ Phil

From:	paul packer
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:53:11 GMT

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:10:40 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

>
>"paul packer"
>>
>>> Take the Mercury Living Presence series. Some of the best recordings
>>> of all time.
>>
>> "** Hisssss, sizzle, snap, crackle, pop , hissss, sizzle,
>> rumble, rumble, rumble, hiss , crackle pop ....."
>>
>> I said "recordings", not pressings.
>
>
>** The words are synonyms - you pathetic, collecting FUCKWIT

Would someone please tell Phil, in words of one syllable, that
"recordings" and "pressings" are NOTsynonyms but totally separate
operations. Recording is the act of capturing an artist's performance
on tape. Pressing is the act of manufacturing LPs or CDs. I'm sure
even Phil can get it in time, if you're patient enough.

>
>
>>> For the record I've never heard the slightest difference between
>>> minidiscs. That's a wank. I've never heard the slightest difference
>>> between interconnects. That's a wank. I HAVE heard a big difference
>>> after damping the top plate of a Marantz CD player.
>>
>>
>> "** Through headphones ??"
>>
>> Yes, through heaphones.
>
>
> ** Then you are a total fucking maniac.
>
> Speakers just might vibrate a metal panel - but never phones.

Would someone explain to Phil that there is vibration in a CD player
even when no speakers are present in the room. It's caused by the CD
mechanism. Explain it gently--we don't want to disturb him from his
permanent slumber.

From:	Heretic
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:21:02 +1100

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:53:11 +0000, paul packer wrote:

>
>
> Would someone please tell Phil,
>
>
>
> Would someone explain to Phil

Ok. Hand me those bits of 4x2, and that sledgehammer...

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:24:33 +1100

"paul packer"
> "Phil Allison"
>>
>>> I said "recordings", not pressings.
>>
>>
>>** The words are synonyms - you pathetic, collecting
>>FUCKWIT
>
> Would someone please tell Phil, in words of one syllable, that
> "recordings" and "pressings" are NOTsynonyms but totally separate
> operations.

** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along - Paul
??

Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??

Tosca Drive - right ???

>>> "** Through headphones ??"
>>>
>>> Yes, through headphones.
>>
>>
>> ** Then you are a total fucking maniac.
>>
>> Speakers just might vibrate a metal panel - but never phones.
>
>
> Would someone explain to Phil that there is vibration in a CD player
> even when no speakers are present in the room. It's caused by the CD
> mechanism. Explain it gently--we don't want to disturb him from his
> permanent slumber.

** But non audible when wearing head phones - even to a self confessed
boy lover.

................. Phil

From:	paul packer
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:37:16 GMT

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:24:33 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

>** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along - Paul
>??
>
> Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??
>
> Tosca Drive - right ???

Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)
You always know when Phil is outflanked. He tries to change the
subject.

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:53:20 +1100

"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
>
>>** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along - Paul
>>??
>>
>> Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??
>>
>> Tosca Drive - right ???
>
>
> Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
> are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
> very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)

** Just wanted you to confirm your address.

> You always know when Phil is outflanked. He tries to change the
> subject.

** Much obliged - thankyou.

............... Phil

From:	Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:27:51 +0800

"Phil Allison" wrote in message
news:35f0m2F4ki013U1@individual.net...
>
> "paul packer"
> "Phil Allison"
> >
> >>** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along -
Paul
> >>??
> >>
> >> Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??
> >>
> >> Tosca Drive - right ???
> >
> >
> > Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
> > are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
> > very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)
>
>
> ** Just wanted you to confirm your address.
>
>
> > You always know when Phil is outflanked. He tries to change the
> > subject.
>
>
> ** Much obliged - thankyou.
>
>
>
>
> .............. Phil
>
>
>

Phil Allison - net stalker extraordinaire and would be supergrass.

Phil you should be more concerned the men in the white van with the straight
jacket don't pay you a visit.

From:	TT
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:53:30 +0800

"Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au>" wrote in message
news:41f254dd$0$31085$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>

>
> Phil you should be more concerned the men in the white van
with....................
your new set of speakers that you just may be able to afford. ;-)

Sorry not dodgy ESLs but cones.

TT :-))

From:	paul packer
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:08:26 GMT

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:53:20 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

>
>"paul packer"
> "Phil Allison"
>>
>>>** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along - Paul
>>>??
>>>
>>> Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??
>>>
>>> Tosca Drive - right ???
>>
>>
>> Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
>> are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
>> very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)
>
>
> ** Just wanted you to confirm your address.

No you didn't, Phil. My suburb is listed on every forum I post to, and
even you can use a phone book to find a fairly rare name in a small
suburb. So what was the point of your post? To suggest you have
"private" info you're going to use against me, in the hope I might be
shaking in my boots. No, sorry, Phil, you're too transparent; and
besides, you've tried the same trick with just about every regular
here. Doesn't wash.
Folks, just for the record Phil Allison is harbouring a total
delusion that I regularly download kiddie , based on no evidence
but a totally flippant remark made here by me many moons ago. This is
the same Phil Allison who also imagines that Alan runs an illegal home
business and takes trips to Thailand for the worst possible reasons,
and that TT views on his works computer whilst getting drunk. All
these allegations have been made on this NG and countless others
against other posters that no one could possibly remember. So welcome,
welcome to Phil's Fantastic Fantasyland. You too can take one of these
exhiliarating rides just by clashing with Phil about anything at all,
no matter how trivial. Just disagree with Phil more than once and next
thing he'll be looking up your address and trying to insinuate that
your morals are contempible and you're engaged in some illegal
activity which he knows about and is on the verge of reporting to the
police. This is Phil's modus operandi, which he never varies. Be not
afraid, boys and girl(s). Phil is a big bag of foul air which every so
often explodes and stinks up the NG. He won't go away, as any other
self-respecting human being would, so it's necessary to stick a pin in
him every so often whilst holding one's nose. Unfortunate, but then
every village has its idiot, and it IS still possible to work around
him. I suggest you do exactly that.

>> You always know when Phil is outflanked. He tries to change the
>> subject.
>
>
> ** Much obliged - thankyou.

No problem. Anytime you want someone to tell you how big a goose you
really are I'm available.

From:	Alan Rutlidge .iinet.net.au
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:29:11 +0800

"paul packer" wrote in message
news:41f2d6d1.256243@news.iprimus.com.au...
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:53:20 +1100, "Phil Allison"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"paul packer"
> > "Phil Allison"
> >>
> >>>** How is your collection of pics of of naked boys coming along -
Paul
> >>>??
> >>>
> >>> Ready for a NSW Police inspection ??
> >>>
> >>> Tosca Drive - right ???
> >>
> >>
> >> Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
> >> are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
> >> very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)
> >
> >
> > ** Just wanted you to confirm your address.
>
> No you didn't, Phil. My suburb is listed on every forum I post to, and
> even you can use a phone book to find a fairly rare name in a small
> suburb. So what was the point of your post? To suggest you have
> "private" info you're going to use against me, in the hope I might be
> shaking in my boots. No, sorry, Phil, you're too transparent; and
> besides, you've tried the same trick with just about every regular
> here. Doesn't wash.
> Folks, just for the record Phil Allison is harbouring a total
> delusion that I regularly download kiddie , based on no evidence
> but a totally flippant remark made here by me many moons ago. This is
> the same Phil Allison who also imagines that Alan runs an illegal home
> business and takes trips to Thailand for the worst possible reasons,
> and that TT views on his works computer whilst getting drunk. All
> these allegations have been made on this NG and countless others
> against other posters that no one could possibly remember. So welcome,
> welcome to Phil's Fantastic Fantasyland. You too can take one of these
> exhiliarating rides just by clashing with Phil about anything at all,
> no matter how trivial. Just disagree with Phil more than once and next
> thing he'll be looking up your address and trying to insinuate that
> your morals are contempible and you're engaged in some illegal
> activity which he knows about and is on the verge of reporting to the
> police. This is Phil's modus operandi, which he never varies. Be not
> afraid, boys and girl(s). Phil is a big bag of foul air which every so
> often explodes and stinks up the NG. He won't go away, as any other
> self-respecting human being would, so it's necessary to stick a pin in
> him every so often whilst holding one's nose. Unfortunate, but then
> every village has its idiot, and it IS still possible to work around
> him. I suggest you do exactly that.
>
>
> >> You always know when Phil is outflanked. He tries to change the
> >> subject.
> >
> >
> > ** Much obliged - thankyou.
>
> No problem. Anytime you want someone to tell you how big a goose you
> really are I'm available.
>

Well said Paul. I believe you have summed our PA up to a T. (Apologies
Mr.T, but I wasn't making references to you.) Just using a common phrase.
:)

The really sad thing is PA is not only a pest in this newsgroup, he has
infested many others and contrary to PA's belief he is just as maligned in
them as he is here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and from time to
time (perhaps more often than less) there are such differences expressed
here.

The big difference between PA and most other posters to this newsgroup is PA
seems to think he has to consistently punctuate his posts with profanities
and personal abuse. Its like he can't express himself without adding it to
his writings. I'm at a loss to explain his actions but I think he would be
more accepted if he cut the personal abuse and profanities from his posts.
It is no wonder he has become the centre of many a joke on this newsgroup.

Cheers,
Alan

From:	paul packer
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:46:44 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:29:11 +0800, "Alan Rutlidge"
.iinet.net.au> wrote:

>Well said Paul. I believe you have summed our PA up to a T. (Apologies
>Mr.T, but I wasn't making references to you.) Just using a common phrase.
>:)
>
>The really sad thing is PA is not only a pest in this newsgroup, he has
>infested many others and contrary to PA's belief he is just as maligned in
>them as he is here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and from time to
>time (perhaps more often than less) there are such differences expressed
>here.
>
>The big difference between PA and most other posters to this newsgroup is PA
>seems to think he has to consistently punctuate his posts with profanities
>and personal abuse. Its like he can't express himself without adding it to
>his writings. I'm at a loss to explain his actions but I think he would be
>more accepted if he cut the personal abuse and profanities from his posts.
>It is no wonder he has become the centre of many a joke on this newsgroup.
>
>Cheers,
>Alan

I wish what you say was true, Alan, but I doubt it. Phil's problem
isn't just profanity but what's behind the profanity: a deep contempt
for others. He doesn't just abuse, he denigrates with every word. He
clearly hates others as much as himself, and I don't know a quick way
out of that particular hole. For all our sakes though, not least his,
I hope he finds one.

From:	TT
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:59:05 +0800

"paul packer" wrote in message
news:41f37193.39880176@news.iprimus.com.au...
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:29:11 +0800, "Alan Rutlidge"
> .iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> >Well said Paul. I believe you have summed our PA up to a T. (Apologies
> >Mr.T, but I wasn't making references to you.) Just using a common
phrase.
> >:)
> >
> >The really sad thing is PA is not only a pest in this newsgroup, he has
> >infested many others and contrary to PA's belief he is just as maligned
in
> >them as he is here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and from time to
> >time (perhaps more often than less) there are such differences expressed
> >here.
> >
> >The big difference between PA and most other posters to this newsgroup is
PA
> >seems to think he has to consistently punctuate his posts with
profanities
> >and personal abuse. Its like he can't express himself without adding it
to
> >his writings. I'm at a loss to explain his actions but I think he would
be
> >more accepted if he cut the personal abuse and profanities from his
posts.
> >It is no wonder he has become the centre of many a joke on this
newsgroup.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Alan
>
> I wish what you say was true, Alan, but I doubt it. Phil's problem
> isn't just profanity but what's behind the profanity: a deep contempt
> for others. He doesn't just abuse, he denigrates with every word. He
> clearly hates others as much as himself, and I don't know a quick way
> out of that particular hole. For all our sakes though, not least his,
> I hope he finds one.

I have previously referred him to seek out Dr. Kevorkian and his sure fire
remedy.

Regards TT

From:	Phil Allison
Subject:	Re: Packer is a Maniac
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:46:32 +1100

"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
>>>
>>> Perhaps someone would like to ask Phil why he's warning me the police
>>> are coming when I'm sure he'd prefer they caught me red-handed. Be
>>> very interested to hear the answer to that one. ;-)
>>
>>
>> ** Just wanted you to confirm your address.
>
>
> No you didn't, Phil. My suburb is listed on every forum I post to,

** But not on usenet ??

> even you can use a phone book to find a fairly rare name in a small
> suburb.

** Gotta know that suburb first.

> So what was the point of your post?

** See above.

> To suggest you have "private" info you're going to use against me,

** Your address is not private info - arsehole.

One needs it to direct correspondence or the police to you.

Something I may need to do as a result of your criminal behaviour.

> Folks, just for the record Phil Allison is harbouring a total
> delusion that I regularly download kiddie , based on no evidence
> but a totally flippant remark made here by me many moons ago.

** That was no flippant remark - and it was quite recent.

You BOASTED about having JPEGS of naked boys on your PC.

> This is
> the same Phil Allison who also imagines that Alan runs an illegal home
> business

** Rutlidge *claimed* he was running one - I just pointed out the
anomaly.

> and takes trips to Thailand for the worst possible reasons,

** He can clear that impression up any time by supplying the reason.

> and that TT views on his works computer whilst getting drunk.

** No imagining involved there - right from the horse's ( TT's )
mouth.

( Rest of Packer's asinine verbal excreta snipped )

................. Phil