|
|
 | | From: | buckeye-ELO at nospam.net | | Subject: | Re: THE OATH FOR PRESIDENT | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:21:37 -0500 |
|
|
 | "krp" wrote:
>:|
>:|"Ken Smith" wrote in message news:41EE5BDC.4050605@it.com...
>:|
>:|
>:|>> ALL of them Carol ... ALL of them recited the oath with right hand on a
>:|>> BIBLE and closing "SO HELP ME GOD!" ALL Carol. ALL of them! There is
>:|>> NOTHING to support YOUR claims to speak for them or that of WHACK JOB
>:|>> Newdow to do likewise.
>:|
>:|> Newdow is technically correct, but his actions are doomed to failure, as
>:|> the Court has crafted a doctrine whereby de minimis infringements are "let
>:|> go." I don't think any of us are really going to squabble with it all
>:|> that much, but it would be intellectually dishonest to say that Mike
>:|> Newdow doesn't have a cogent point.
>:|
>:| Newdow is full of shit! He couldn't be more wrong Constitutionally if
>:|he stayed up for a year setting out to be wrong!
LOL, actually he is totally correct constitutionally.
|
|
| | From: | Gray Shockley | | Subject: | Re: THE OATH FOR PRESIDENT | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:21:52 -0600 |
|
|
| On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:21:37 -0600, buckeye-ELO@nospam.net
wrote
(in article <85c7v0djs6ll1uhaetuqf286rsp59iu7tg@4ax.com>):
> "krp" wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> "Ken Smith" wrote in message
>>>> news:41EE5BDC.4050605@it.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ALL of them Carol ... ALL of them recited the oath with right hand on a
>>>>>> BIBLE and closing "SO HELP ME GOD!" ALL Carol. ALL of them! There is
>>>>>> NOTHING to support YOUR claims to speak for them or that of WHACK JOB
>>>>>> Newdow to do likewise.
>>>>
>>>>> Newdow is technically correct, but his actions are doomed to failure, as
>>>>> the Court has crafted a doctrine whereby de minimis infringements are
>>>>> "let
>>>>> go." I don't think any of us are really going to squabble with it all
>>>>> that much, but it would be intellectually dishonest to say that Mike
>>>>> Newdow doesn't have a cogent point.
>>>>
>>>> Newdow is full of shit! He couldn't be more wrong Constitutionally if
>>>> he stayed up for a year setting out to be wrong!
>
>
> LOL, actually he is totally correct constitutionally.
>
>
There seems to be a reason that your verbal opponent in
this case has a set of initials - "krp" - that can only be
pronounced as "crap".
++ Gray //
|
|
|
