newsgroups-index (beta)

Current group: alt.drugs.

TURMEL: Tarzan Ethier's North Bay 5(2) charge same as mine

TURMEL: Tarzan Ethier's North Bay 5(2) charge same as mine  
John Turmel
From:John Turmel
Subject:TURMEL: Tarzan Ethier's North Bay 5(2) charge same as mine
Date:21 Jan 2005 12:03:17 GMT

JCT: I got a phone call today from Rev Michael "Tarzan"
Ethier from the North Bay jail at 2550 Trout Lake Rd. North
Bay P1B 7S7.

He said he was facing only S.5(2) like me. Which explains
why the judge may have accepted S.4 and S.7 being repealed
but not that it affected Section 5(2). But he says he did
raise Parker as the reason that S.4 was down and Krieger as
the reason that S.7 was down. So the judge may not have said
"I agree but.." but only "but you're charged with S.5."
Can't wait to find out.

He said he has no S.5(1) trafficking so he's on an identical
Turmel charge possession of the bad purpose under S.5(2). If
he gets his quashed next Thursday Jan 27 in Sturgeon Falls,
it helps me get mine prohibited at the top.

So here's how I explained his situation vis-a-vis mine.

In the lower court, I only made the Letter of the Law
argument and only heard the Spirit of the Law argument on
Oct 22 2004 from Justice Earle-Renton 2 weeks after I'd
served my Supreme Court leave application. And I was going
to add it to my Letter of the Law argument in my upcoming
last Reply.

I explained to him how he could also raise the Letter of the
Law but it was pretty useless in Ontario if the judge was
going to say he was bound by the Court of Appeal in Turmel's
S.5(2) challenge. Letter of the law should have better
chance in a non-Ontario case.

But Mike should still make it just in case a judge may not
like the Doherty panel and wants to diss them by siding
against them when they're wrong knowing he'll eventually be
proven right. And righteous too.

But the Spirit of the Law argument has never been tested in
the lower court where the S.4 had been accepted as invalid
before.

Justice Earle-Renton did say that if it's legal to possess,
possessing can't have an illegal purpose. Once the spirit of
the law is gone, it boils down to thought crime.

Sure, I'm raising it in the highest court very soon but
wouldn't it be wonderful to find Spirit victorious in the
lower court first?

So, the transcript of the judge's statements about Parker
and especially Krieger could prove of great value to all
upcoming cases, maybe some old ones too.

Anyway, I told him to call the Spirit of the Law his Earle-
Renton card and the Letter of the Law his Turmel at the top
card and he only had to show S.4 and S.7 are dead to call
them both into action.


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
   

Copyright © 2006 newsgroups-index   -   All rights reserved   -   Impressum