"You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
ran is right at the top of the list."
--Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
with the Monkey's "mandate"

http://www.bartcop.com/

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:41:47 GMT

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
> ran is right at the top of the list."
> --Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
> with the Monkey's "mandate"

Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by or
question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all aware
of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be suprised
at all.

Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.

How's the body counting coming along?

From:	Christopher Benson-Manica
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:50:52 +0000 (UTC)

In talk.abortion Frank Dwyer wrote:

> Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by or
> question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all aware
> of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be suprised
> at all.

Keegan is cut from the Chilton mold - characterized by starry-eyed
optimism and ignorance of what is happening and why.

Iraq was clrearly a bigger political prize than Iran, which is
presumably why we're only just now getting to Iran when it should have
been invaded first.

> Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
> the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
> nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.

It's the hippie peacenik wing of the party doing the spoon-feeding -
not all Democrats buy into pacifism.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

From:	Ray Fischer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 04:05:23 GMT

Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>In talk.abortion Frank Dwyer wrote:

>> Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
>> the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
>> nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>
>It's the hippie peacenik wing of the party doing the spoon-feeding -
>not all Democrats buy into pacifism.

Opposing an unjust war that the US is now losing is "pacifism"?

What is supporting such a war? Gross stupidity?

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 04:47:52 GMT

Ray Fischer wrote:
> Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
>>In talk.abortion Frank Dwyer wrote:
>
>
>>>Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
>>>the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
>>>nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>>
>>It's the hippie peacenik wing of the party doing the spoon-feeding -
>>not all Democrats buy into pacifism.
>
>
> Opposing an unjust war that the US is now losing is "pacifism"?

Define losing.

> What is supporting such a war? Gross stupidity?

From:	Ray Fischer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:22:45 GMT

Frank Dwyer wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:

>>>>Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
>>>>the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
>>>>nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>>>
>>>It's the hippie peacenik wing of the party doing the spoon-feeding -
>>>not all Democrats buy into pacifism.
>>
>>
>> Opposing an unjust war that the US is now losing is "pacifism"?
>
>Define losing.

Violence is up, US deaths are up, killing is up, oil production is
down, infrastructure is down. By pretty much any measure you choose,
the US is losing the war in Iraq.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

From:	* US *
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:07:56 -0500

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:50:52 +0000 (UTC), Christopher Benson-Manica
wrote:

>Iraq was clrearly a bigger political prize than Iran, which is
>presumably why we're only just now getting to Iran when it should have
>been invaded first.

Neither Iran nor Iraq should be invaded at all.

From:	james g. keegan jr.
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	23 Jan 2005 21:46:16 GMT

Frank Dwyer wrote in news:vSUId.1593$AK3.1006
@news02.roc.ny:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
>> ran is right at the top of the list."
>> --Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
>> with the Monkey's "mandate"
>
> Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by or
> question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all aware
> of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be suprised
> at all.
>
> Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
> the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
> nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.

you sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:29:09 GMT

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> Frank Dwyer wrote in news:vSUId.1593$AK3.1006
> @news02.roc.ny:
>
>
>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
>>>ran is right at the top of the list."
>>>--Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
>>> with the Monkey's "mandate"
>>
>>Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by or
>>question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all aware
>>of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be suprised
>>at all.
>>
>>Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying into
>>the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all know you're
>>nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>
>
>
> you sound

Your inability to comprehend is noted.

From:	james g. keegan jr.
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	23 Jan 2005 22:41:07 GMT

Frank Dwyer wrote in
news:VyVId.1599$6J3.1457@news02.roc.ny:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> Frank Dwyer wrote in news:vSUId.1593$AK3.1006
>> @news02.roc.ny:
>>
>>
>>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
>>>>ran is right at the top of the list."
>>>>--Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
>>>> with the Monkey's "mandate"
>>>
>>>Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by
>>>or question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all
>>>aware of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be
>>>suprised at all.
>>>
>>>Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying
>>>into the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all
>>>know you're nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>>
>>
>> you sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>
> Your inability to comprehend is noted.

you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:23:43 GMT

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> Frank Dwyer wrote in
> news:VyVId.1599$6J3.1457@news02.roc.ny:
>
>
>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank Dwyer wrote in news:vSUId.1593$AK3.1006
>>>@news02.roc.ny:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"You look around the world at potential trouble spots,
>>>>>ran is right at the top of the list."
>>>>>--Dick 'Eternal war' Cheney, crying wolf, ready to invade Iran
>>>>> with the Monkey's "mandate"
>>>>
>>>>Your question marks in the subject line indicate you're suprised by
>>>>or question the reasoning behind targeting Iran next. Were you at all
>>>>aware of how America operates and what it's motives are, you'd not be
>>>>suprised at all.
>>>>
>>>>Instead of educating yourself though, you just keep right on buying
>>>>into the partisan bullshit being spoon-fed to you, because we all
>>>>know you're nothing if you aren't complaining about phantom fears.
>>>
>>>
>>>you sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>>
>>Your inability to comprehend is noted.
>
>
> you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.

You misinterpret lack of respect for irritation.

From:	james g. keegan jr.
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	24 Jan 2005 02:40:08 GMT

Frank Dwyer wrote in news:jeXId.1616$s14.1062
@news02.roc.ny:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>
> You misinterpret lack of respect for irritation.

if you had any respect for readers, you woudn't have forged in the first
place.

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:50:08 GMT

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> Frank Dwyer wrote in news:jeXId.1616$s14.1062
> @news02.roc.ny:
>
>
>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>>you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>>
>>You misinterpret lack of respect for irritation.
>
>
>
> if you had any respect for readers, you woudn't have forged in the first
> place.

I have no respect for you, and what you call a forgery isn't, kook.

From:	james g. keegan jr.
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	24 Jan 2005 03:07:59 GMT

Frank Dwyer wrote in
news:AnZId.1645$I34.1390@news02.roc.ny:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> Frank Dwyer wrote in news:jeXId.1616$s14.1062
>> @news02.roc.ny:
>>
>>
>>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>>you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>>>
>>>You misinterpret lack of respect for irritation.
>>
>>
>> if you had any respect for readers, you woudn't have forged in the
>> first place.
>
> I have no respect for you, and what you call a forgery isn't, kook.

maybe you'll feel like less of a sleazebag for forging if you call me
names.

From:	Frank Dwyer
Subject:	Re: iran next??
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 03:11:28 GMT

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> Frank Dwyer wrote in
> news:AnZId.1645$I34.1390@news02.roc.ny:
>
>
>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank Dwyer wrote in news:jeXId.1616$s14.1062
>>>@news02.roc.ny:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>you still sound irritated that i criticized you for forging.
>>>>
>>>>You misinterpret lack of respect for irritation.
>>>
>>>
>>>if you had any respect for readers, you woudn't have forged in the
>>>first place.
>>
>>I have no respect for you, and what you call a forgery isn't, kook.
>
>
>
> maybe you'll feel like less of a sleazebag for forging if you call me
> names.

Maybe you'll live in sociopathic denial forever.